Comparative Assessment of colorimetric assays in evaluating intracellular drug susceptibility of Leishmania tropica against conventional antileishmanial drugs.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY
Ahmet Yıldırım, Tülay Aksoy, İbrahim Cüneyt Balcıoğlu
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of colorimetric assays in evaluating intracellular drug susceptibility of Leishmania tropica against conventional antileishmanial drugs.","authors":"Ahmet Yıldırım, Tülay Aksoy, İbrahim Cüneyt Balcıoğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.parint.2024.103021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to identify the most sensitive colorimetric test for assessing intracellular drug susceptibility of Leishmania tropica to conventional antileishmanial drugs. To this end, the efficacy of four colorimetric methods-MTT, XTT, MTS, and WST-8-was compared using reference L. tropica promastigotes. The intracellular drug susceptibility was further evaluated using the test with the widest absorbance range on isolates from Türkiye CL patients: two responsive to a single course of meglumine antimoniate (MA) and two that showed no clinical improvement after two treatments. CL isolates were identified via real-time PCR targeting the ITS1 region. Promastigote suspensions at standardized densities (0.08 × 10<sup>6</sup> to 10 × 10<sup>6</sup> promastigotes/well) were prepared in both RPMI (phenol red-containing) and RPMIØRP (phenol red-free) media, then analyzed with ELISA-based MTT, XTT, MTS, and WST-8 to identify the method with the broadest specific absorbance range. Intracellular drug susceptibility of CL isolates was subsequently assessed in a macrophage/amastigote model by infecting THP-1 macrophages with promastigotes from both reference and patient isolates, followed by treatment with MA, sodium stibogluconate (SSG), miltefosine (MTF), pentamidine (PMD), and amphotericin B (AmB). Promastigotes obtained from parasite rescue and transformation assays were analyzed using the most sensitive colorimetric method to determine IC₅₀ values. Species identification confirmed all four CL isolates as L. tropica, and the XTT assay provided the widest absorbance range in RPMIØRP media. IC₅₀ values for both treatment-responsive and unresponsive isolates were similar to those of the reference isolate, showing susceptibility to all tested drugs without statistically significant differences. Expanding the isolate set is necessary to further evaluate the predictive value of Sb<sup>V</sup> (pentavalent antimonials) susceptibility for treatment outcomes. The identification of XTT as the most sensitive method for intracellular antileishmanial susceptibility testing is expected to aid in standardizing laboratory models and provide valuable insights for researchers and clinicians managing treatment-unresponsive CL cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19983,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology International","volume":" ","pages":"103021"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2024.103021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify the most sensitive colorimetric test for assessing intracellular drug susceptibility of Leishmania tropica to conventional antileishmanial drugs. To this end, the efficacy of four colorimetric methods-MTT, XTT, MTS, and WST-8-was compared using reference L. tropica promastigotes. The intracellular drug susceptibility was further evaluated using the test with the widest absorbance range on isolates from Türkiye CL patients: two responsive to a single course of meglumine antimoniate (MA) and two that showed no clinical improvement after two treatments. CL isolates were identified via real-time PCR targeting the ITS1 region. Promastigote suspensions at standardized densities (0.08 × 106 to 10 × 106 promastigotes/well) were prepared in both RPMI (phenol red-containing) and RPMIØRP (phenol red-free) media, then analyzed with ELISA-based MTT, XTT, MTS, and WST-8 to identify the method with the broadest specific absorbance range. Intracellular drug susceptibility of CL isolates was subsequently assessed in a macrophage/amastigote model by infecting THP-1 macrophages with promastigotes from both reference and patient isolates, followed by treatment with MA, sodium stibogluconate (SSG), miltefosine (MTF), pentamidine (PMD), and amphotericin B (AmB). Promastigotes obtained from parasite rescue and transformation assays were analyzed using the most sensitive colorimetric method to determine IC₅₀ values. Species identification confirmed all four CL isolates as L. tropica, and the XTT assay provided the widest absorbance range in RPMIØRP media. IC₅₀ values for both treatment-responsive and unresponsive isolates were similar to those of the reference isolate, showing susceptibility to all tested drugs without statistically significant differences. Expanding the isolate set is necessary to further evaluate the predictive value of SbV (pentavalent antimonials) susceptibility for treatment outcomes. The identification of XTT as the most sensitive method for intracellular antileishmanial susceptibility testing is expected to aid in standardizing laboratory models and provide valuable insights for researchers and clinicians managing treatment-unresponsive CL cases.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology International
Parasitology International 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
140
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Parasitology International provides a medium for rapid, carefully reviewed publications in the field of human and animal parasitology. Original papers, rapid communications, and original case reports from all geographical areas and covering all parasitological disciplines, including structure, immunology, cell biology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and systematics, may be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly, but suggestions in this respect are welcome. Letters to the Editor commenting on any aspect of the Journal are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信