Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Extra-Prevertebral Fascial Suprascapular Nerve and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Phrenic Nerve Function in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S487562
Zhenfa Hu, Jinge Hu, Zhangran Ai, Songchao Xu, Huili Li, Ruijuan Guo, Yun Wang
{"title":"Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Extra-Prevertebral Fascial Suprascapular Nerve and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Phrenic Nerve Function in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Zhenfa Hu, Jinge Hu, Zhangran Ai, Songchao Xu, Huili Li, Ruijuan Guo, Yun Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S487562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The suprascapular nerve is situated between the prevertebral fascia and the superficial layer of deep cervical fascia and on the surface of the middle and posterior scalene muscles before it reaches the suprascapular notch. Consequently, we hypothesized that injecting local anesthetics (LAs) there would introduce a new block approach for blocking the suprascapular nerve, ie, extra-prevertebral fascial block. We assessed the postoperative analgesic effect, as well as the incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis 30 minutes after the block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>30 patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery were recruited in this study. Before the induction of general anesthesia, 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to perform an extra-prevertebral fascia suprascapular nerve block (10 mL) and an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (5 mL, primarily targeting the axillary nerve). All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after surgery. The postoperative pain was scored with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), along with the opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. The incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) was measured 30 minutes after the block.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients received the successful block. The resting NRS pain scores at 1h, 6h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were 0 [0, 2], 0 [0, 2], 1 [0, 2], and 2 [1, 3], respectively. The oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 24 hours after surgery was 18 [12,30] mg. No patients experienced HDP (complete or partial) 30 minutes after the block.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the posterior approach, this novel technique is efficient and has a higher success rate of blockade. It eliminates the need for patients to change positions, thereby improving comfort. Additionally, when combined with the infraclavicular brachial plexus block, it can effectively block the suprascapular nerve, providing satisfactory postoperative analgesia without the HDP at 30min after blockade compared to the anterior approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"4453-4462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S487562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The suprascapular nerve is situated between the prevertebral fascia and the superficial layer of deep cervical fascia and on the surface of the middle and posterior scalene muscles before it reaches the suprascapular notch. Consequently, we hypothesized that injecting local anesthetics (LAs) there would introduce a new block approach for blocking the suprascapular nerve, ie, extra-prevertebral fascial block. We assessed the postoperative analgesic effect, as well as the incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis 30 minutes after the block.

Methods: 30 patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery were recruited in this study. Before the induction of general anesthesia, 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to perform an extra-prevertebral fascia suprascapular nerve block (10 mL) and an infraclavicular brachial plexus block (5 mL, primarily targeting the axillary nerve). All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after surgery. The postoperative pain was scored with Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), along with the opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. The incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) was measured 30 minutes after the block.

Results: All patients received the successful block. The resting NRS pain scores at 1h, 6h, 12h, and 24h postoperatively were 0 [0, 2], 0 [0, 2], 1 [0, 2], and 2 [1, 3], respectively. The oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 24 hours after surgery was 18 [12,30] mg. No patients experienced HDP (complete or partial) 30 minutes after the block.

Conclusion: Compared with the posterior approach, this novel technique is efficient and has a higher success rate of blockade. It eliminates the need for patients to change positions, thereby improving comfort. Additionally, when combined with the infraclavicular brachial plexus block, it can effectively block the suprascapular nerve, providing satisfactory postoperative analgesia without the HDP at 30min after blockade compared to the anterior approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信