Characterization of Pain in Lipedema: Reliability and Validity of Pain Pressure Thresholds and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer Assessments in People with Lipedema.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lymphatic research and biology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1089/lrb.2024.0058
Francesco Bettariga, Luca Fumagalli, Daniele Aloisi, Luca Maestroni, Sara Mantovani
{"title":"Characterization of Pain in Lipedema: Reliability and Validity of Pain Pressure Thresholds and Hand-Held Sphygmomanometer Assessments in People with Lipedema.","authors":"Francesco Bettariga, Luca Fumagalli, Daniele Aloisi, Luca Maestroni, Sara Mantovani","doi":"10.1089/lrb.2024.0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue, leading to pain. The lack of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria complicates the characterization of pain. Physiological parameters such as pain pressure threshold (PPT) represent promising prognostic markers for diagnosing lipedema, yet they remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of two pain pressure measurements, PPT and the hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) in lipedema. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 28 adult females diagnosed with lipedema were recruited. Both PPT, using a digital algometer, and HHS, using a manual aneroid HHS, were performed to assess pain in the lower limbs. The testing was performed in a standing position with PPT and HHS placed on the calf. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were employed to assess the within session reliability, while the validity between PPT and HHS was analyzed using <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> in a linear regression model. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The results showed excellent reliability for both PPT and HHS, with ICC indicating high consistency (ICC = 0.93 to 0.97) and CV showing acceptable scores (CV = 3.62% to 9.06%). In addition, good validity between PPT and HHS was also observed (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.69 to 0.74), suggesting that HHS can be a reliable alternative to PPT for pain assessment in lipedema. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These findings have important clinical implications, as they expand the knowledge of pain characterization in people with lipedema, potentially aiding in diagnostic refinement. In addition, a cost-effective and accessible method for assessing pain was examined (i.e., HHS), showing promising findings and providing an objective method to help diagnose lipedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":18168,"journal":{"name":"Lymphatic research and biology","volume":" ","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphatic research and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2024.0058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lipedema is a chronic condition characterized by abnormal deposition of subcutaneous adipose tissue, leading to pain. The lack of internationally recognized diagnostic criteria complicates the characterization of pain. Physiological parameters such as pain pressure threshold (PPT) represent promising prognostic markers for diagnosing lipedema, yet they remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of two pain pressure measurements, PPT and the hand-held sphygmomanometer (HHS) in lipedema. Methods: A total of 28 adult females diagnosed with lipedema were recruited. Both PPT, using a digital algometer, and HHS, using a manual aneroid HHS, were performed to assess pain in the lower limbs. The testing was performed in a standing position with PPT and HHS placed on the calf. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were employed to assess the within session reliability, while the validity between PPT and HHS was analyzed using R2 in a linear regression model. Results: The results showed excellent reliability for both PPT and HHS, with ICC indicating high consistency (ICC = 0.93 to 0.97) and CV showing acceptable scores (CV = 3.62% to 9.06%). In addition, good validity between PPT and HHS was also observed (R2 = 0.69 to 0.74), suggesting that HHS can be a reliable alternative to PPT for pain assessment in lipedema. Conclusion: These findings have important clinical implications, as they expand the knowledge of pain characterization in people with lipedema, potentially aiding in diagnostic refinement. In addition, a cost-effective and accessible method for assessing pain was examined (i.e., HHS), showing promising findings and providing an objective method to help diagnose lipedema.

脂水肿患者疼痛的特征:脂水肿患者疼痛压力阈值和手持式血压计评估的可靠性和有效性。
背景:脂肪水肿是一种慢性疾病,其特征是皮下脂肪组织异常沉积,导致疼痛。缺乏国际公认的诊断标准使疼痛的表征复杂化。生理参数如痛压阈值(PPT)是诊断脂肪水肿的有希望的预后指标,但它们仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估两种疼痛压力测量方法PPT和手持式血压计(HHS)在脂肪水肿中的可靠性和有效性。方法:共招募28名确诊为脂肪水肿的成年女性。使用数字测痛仪的PPT和使用手动无关节HHS的HHS来评估下肢疼痛。测试在站立位置进行,PPT和HHS放置在小腿上。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV)评估会话内信度,采用线性回归模型R2分析PPT与HHS之间的效度。结果:PPT和HHS的结果均具有良好的信度,其中ICC一致性高(ICC = 0.93 ~ 0.97), CV可接受(CV = 3.62% ~ 9.06%)。此外,PPT和HHS之间也有良好的效度(R2 = 0.69 ~ 0.74),提示HHS可以作为脂肪水肿疼痛评估的可靠替代方法。结论:这些发现具有重要的临床意义,因为它们扩展了对脂水肿患者疼痛特征的认识,可能有助于改进诊断。此外,研究了一种具有成本效益和可获得的评估疼痛的方法(即HHS),显示了有希望的发现,并提供了一种客观的方法来帮助诊断脂水肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lymphatic research and biology
Lymphatic research and biology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lymphatic Research and Biology delivers the most current peer-reviewed advances and developments in lymphatic biology and pathology from the world’s leading biomedical investigators. The Journal provides original research from a broad range of investigative disciplines, including genetics, biochemistry and biophysics, cellular and molecular biology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomy, developmental biology, and pathology. Lymphatic Research and Biology coverage includes: -Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis -Genetics of lymphatic disorders -Human lymphatic disease, including lymphatic insufficiency and associated vascular anomalies -Physiology of intestinal fluid and protein balance -Immunosurveillance and immune cell trafficking -Tumor biology and metastasis -Pharmacology -Lymphatic imaging -Endothelial and smooth muscle cell biology -Inflammation, infection, and autoimmune disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信