[Safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function].

Q4 Medicine
上海口腔医学 Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Qi Zhu, Wei Zhao, Hua-Ying Wu
{"title":"[Safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function].","authors":"Qi Zhu, Wei Zhao, Hua-Ying Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 patients with impacted anterior teeth who received treatment from January 2017 to December 2022 were selected, and randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were treated with occlusion adjustment and orthodontic traction. Closed traction was used in the experimental group, while open traction was used in the control group. The clinical efficacy, treatment duration, chewing ability, root length, periroot bone density, dental aesthetic score, pulp blood flow at different time points and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total effective rate was 95.00% in the experimental group and 90.00% in the control group, with no significant difference(P>0.05). There was significant difference in traction eruption time and orthodontic time between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in masticatory efficiency, bite force and masticatory pain score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in root length and periroot bone density between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in white aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P> 0.05), but there was significant difference in red aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pulp blood flow between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). At T1, the pulp blood flow reached its peak higher than T0; at T2, it rapidly decreased below T1 but higher than T0; at T3, it gradually decreased below T1 and T2 but higher than T0(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was 10.00% compared with 27.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both closed traction and open traction correction can effectively treat the impacted anterior teeth, and the two methods have no significant effects on root length, surrounding bone density and pulp blood flow. Although the treatment time of closed traction is slightly longer, it is more beneficial to improve patients' masticatory ability, and has high aesthetics and safety, which is worthy of clinical promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"33 5","pages":"517-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the safety of closed traction appliance in the treatment of impacted anterior teeth and its effect on pulp blood flow and masticatory function.

Methods: A total of 80 patients with impacted anterior teeth who received treatment from January 2017 to December 2022 were selected, and randomly divided into experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. The two groups of patients were treated with occlusion adjustment and orthodontic traction. Closed traction was used in the experimental group, while open traction was used in the control group. The clinical efficacy, treatment duration, chewing ability, root length, periroot bone density, dental aesthetic score, pulp blood flow at different time points and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software package.

Results: The total effective rate was 95.00% in the experimental group and 90.00% in the control group, with no significant difference(P>0.05). There was significant difference in traction eruption time and orthodontic time between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in masticatory efficiency, bite force and masticatory pain score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in root length and periroot bone density between the two groups before and after treatment(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in white aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P> 0.05), but there was significant difference in red aesthetic score between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pulp blood flow between the two groups at each time point(P>0.05). At T1, the pulp blood flow reached its peak higher than T0; at T2, it rapidly decreased below T1 but higher than T0; at T3, it gradually decreased below T1 and T2 but higher than T0(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events in the experimental group was 10.00% compared with 27.50% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusions: Both closed traction and open traction correction can effectively treat the impacted anterior teeth, and the two methods have no significant effects on root length, surrounding bone density and pulp blood flow. Although the treatment time of closed traction is slightly longer, it is more beneficial to improve patients' masticatory ability, and has high aesthetics and safety, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
上海口腔医学
上海口腔医学 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5299
期刊介绍: "Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信