{"title":"Risk Factors for Gangrenous Cholecystitis and the Outcomes of Early Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study of a Single-Center City General Hospital.","authors":"Mampei Yamashita, Takayuki Tanaka, Yorihisa Sumida, Shoto Yamazaki, Yuki Hara, Akiko Fukuda, Makoto Hisanaga, Koki Wakata, Masato Araki, Susumu Eguchi","doi":"10.18926/AMO/67869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is classified as moderate acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 (TG18). We evaluated the risk factors for GC and the outcomes of early cholecystectomy. A total of 136 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed; 58 of these patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with GC (GC group) based on our retrospective pathologic diagnosis. We comparatively evaluated the patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes between the GC group and non-GC group. The GC group was significantly older and included more hypertensive patients than the non-GC group. The GC group was prescribed more antibiotics as initial treatment than the non-GC group, and they had more days between onset and surgery. The preoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values were significantly higher in the GC group than in the non-GC group, and these values were predictive factors for GC. Cholecystectomy required a longer operation time and caused greater blood loss in the GC group. The GC group also had longer hospitalization times than the non-GC group; however, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications. In conclusion, gangrenous changes should be assessed when diagnosing cholecystitis, and appropriate treatment, such as surgery or drainage, should be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"78 6","pages":"439-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/67869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gangrenous cholecystitis (GC) is classified as moderate acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo Guidelines from 2018 (TG18). We evaluated the risk factors for GC and the outcomes of early cholecystectomy. A total of 136 patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were retrospectively analyzed; 58 of these patients (42.6%) were diagnosed with GC (GC group) based on our retrospective pathologic diagnosis. We comparatively evaluated the patient backgrounds and surgical outcomes between the GC group and non-GC group. The GC group was significantly older and included more hypertensive patients than the non-GC group. The GC group was prescribed more antibiotics as initial treatment than the non-GC group, and they had more days between onset and surgery. The preoperative white blood cell count and C-reactive protein values were significantly higher in the GC group than in the non-GC group, and these values were predictive factors for GC. Cholecystectomy required a longer operation time and caused greater blood loss in the GC group. The GC group also had longer hospitalization times than the non-GC group; however, no significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications. In conclusion, gangrenous changes should be assessed when diagnosing cholecystitis, and appropriate treatment, such as surgery or drainage, should be undertaken.
期刊介绍:
Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.