Evaluating current status of network pharmacology for herbal medicine focusing on identifying mechanisms and therapeutic effects

IF 11.4 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Won-Yung Lee, Kwang-Il Park, Seon-Been Bak, Seungho Lee, Su-Jin Bae, Min-Jin Kim, Sun-Dong Park, Choon Ok Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Young Woo Kim, Chang-Eop Kim
{"title":"Evaluating current status of network pharmacology for herbal medicine focusing on identifying mechanisms and therapeutic effects","authors":"Won-Yung Lee, Kwang-Il Park, Seon-Been Bak, Seungho Lee, Su-Jin Bae, Min-Jin Kim, Sun-Dong Park, Choon Ok Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Young Woo Kim, Chang-Eop Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jare.2024.12.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Introduction</h3>Network pharmacology has gained significant traction as a tool for identifying the mechanisms and therapeutic effects of herbal medicines. However, despite the usefulness of these approaches, their diversity underscores the critical need for a systematic evaluation to ensure consistency and reliability.<h3>Objectives</h3>We aimed to evaluate the network pharmacological analyses, focusing on identifying the mechanisms and therapeutic effects of herbal medicines.<h3>Methods</h3>We employed a comprehensive approach involving systematic data retrieval, network construction, and analysis. Herbal compounds and their targets were meticulously extracted from five distinct network pharmacology databases to ensure extensive coverage and high data reliability. Advanced network-based methods were used to identify key herbal targets and predict therapeutic effects, thereby enriching the depth and breadth of the analysis. Experimental validation was performed on prostate cancer models to substantiate the computational predictions.<h3>Results</h3>The results of the recapitulating task for known herbal ingredient targets revealed distinct patterns in performance and coverage based on network construction and aggregation methods. We performed the same analysis to identify herbal targets and found that network centrality, path counts, and downweighted path counts had their own pros and cons. By comparing network-based methods, we found that considering the impact on the multiscale interactome yielded the highest accuracy in discriminating known therapeutic effects. Using optimal conditions, we successfully identified new indications for herbal medicines and validated these findings through follow-up <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> experiments.<h3>Conclusion</h3>This study presents the first comprehensive and critical evaluation of the current network pharmacology analyses in the field of herbal medicine and provides valuable guidance for continued advances in the elucidation of the mechanisms and therapeutic effects.","PeriodicalId":14952,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.12.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Network pharmacology has gained significant traction as a tool for identifying the mechanisms and therapeutic effects of herbal medicines. However, despite the usefulness of these approaches, their diversity underscores the critical need for a systematic evaluation to ensure consistency and reliability.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the network pharmacological analyses, focusing on identifying the mechanisms and therapeutic effects of herbal medicines.

Methods

We employed a comprehensive approach involving systematic data retrieval, network construction, and analysis. Herbal compounds and their targets were meticulously extracted from five distinct network pharmacology databases to ensure extensive coverage and high data reliability. Advanced network-based methods were used to identify key herbal targets and predict therapeutic effects, thereby enriching the depth and breadth of the analysis. Experimental validation was performed on prostate cancer models to substantiate the computational predictions.

Results

The results of the recapitulating task for known herbal ingredient targets revealed distinct patterns in performance and coverage based on network construction and aggregation methods. We performed the same analysis to identify herbal targets and found that network centrality, path counts, and downweighted path counts had their own pros and cons. By comparing network-based methods, we found that considering the impact on the multiscale interactome yielded the highest accuracy in discriminating known therapeutic effects. Using optimal conditions, we successfully identified new indications for herbal medicines and validated these findings through follow-up in vitro and in vivo experiments.

Conclusion

This study presents the first comprehensive and critical evaluation of the current network pharmacology analyses in the field of herbal medicine and provides valuable guidance for continued advances in the elucidation of the mechanisms and therapeutic effects.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Research
Journal of Advanced Research Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
280
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Advanced Research (J. Adv. Res.) is an applied/natural sciences, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on interdisciplinary research. The journal aims to contribute to applied research and knowledge worldwide through the publication of original and high-quality research articles in the fields of Medicine, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dentistry, Physical Therapy, Veterinary Medicine, and Basic and Biological Sciences. The following abstracting and indexing services cover the Journal of Advanced Research: PubMed/Medline, Essential Science Indicators, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed Central, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信