Retinal Vascular Permeability in Diabetic Subjects without Retinopathy Compared with Mild Diabetic Retinopathy and Healthy Controls

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Sarah R. Vavrek , Elif Kayaalp Nalbant PhD , Nicholas Konopek , Nicole L. Decker , Amani A. Fawzi MD , William F. Mieler MD , Kenneth M. Tichauer PhD , Jennifer J. Kang-Mieler PhD
{"title":"Retinal Vascular Permeability in Diabetic Subjects without Retinopathy Compared with Mild Diabetic Retinopathy and Healthy Controls","authors":"Sarah R. Vavrek ,&nbsp;Elif Kayaalp Nalbant PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Konopek ,&nbsp;Nicole L. Decker ,&nbsp;Amani A. Fawzi MD ,&nbsp;William F. Mieler MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth M. Tichauer PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Kang-Mieler PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2024.100636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate retinal vascular permeability mapping as a potential biomarker for diabetic retinopathy in subjects with diabetes with no signs of retinopathy and with mild nonproliferative retinopathy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This is a case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Participants included 7 healthy controls, 22 subjects with diabetes mellitus and no clinical signs of retinopathy (DMnoDR), and 7 subjects with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All participants underwent routine retinal fluorescein videoangiography (FVA). Each FVA dataset was analyzed with the dynamic tracer kinetic model (DTKM) method to estimate 5 parameters: extraction fraction (<em>E</em>), blood flow, arrival time, transit time, and rate constant defined via adiabatic solution. The DTKM method was based on indicator dilution theory, including sequential use of 2 prominent kinetic models: the plug flow model and the adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Extraction fraction, i.e., the fluorescein dye leakage measured during 1 pass through surrounding retinal tissue, is extracted via DTKM method and directly relates to retinal vascular permeability. Thus, <em>E</em> represents the preclinical biomarker, retinal vascular permeability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 3 diagnostic groups were found to have significantly different permeability (<em>P</em> = 0.003). Despite having no clinical signs of retinopathy, the mean rank of average vascular <em>E</em> was significantly higher in DMnoDR subjects compared with healthy controls (<em>P</em> = 0.04), as was the mean rank of <em>E</em> for mild NPDR subjects (<em>P</em> = 0.002). The average <em>E</em> for mild NPDR, DMnoDR, and control subjects was 0.10 ± 0.04, 0.07 ± 0.04, and 0.04 ± 0.01, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The vascular permeability extracted from FVA datasets using the DTKM method is a promising biomarker for detecting preclinical retinal pathology in patients with diabetes. Longitudinal studies are ongoing to explore the ability of this biomarker to distinguish those subjects with diabetes who will progress to clinically apparent retinopathy from those who will not.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914524001726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate retinal vascular permeability mapping as a potential biomarker for diabetic retinopathy in subjects with diabetes with no signs of retinopathy and with mild nonproliferative retinopathy.

Design

This is a case-control study.

Subjects

Participants included 7 healthy controls, 22 subjects with diabetes mellitus and no clinical signs of retinopathy (DMnoDR), and 7 subjects with mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).

Methods

All participants underwent routine retinal fluorescein videoangiography (FVA). Each FVA dataset was analyzed with the dynamic tracer kinetic model (DTKM) method to estimate 5 parameters: extraction fraction (E), blood flow, arrival time, transit time, and rate constant defined via adiabatic solution. The DTKM method was based on indicator dilution theory, including sequential use of 2 prominent kinetic models: the plug flow model and the adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model.

Main Outcome Measures

Extraction fraction, i.e., the fluorescein dye leakage measured during 1 pass through surrounding retinal tissue, is extracted via DTKM method and directly relates to retinal vascular permeability. Thus, E represents the preclinical biomarker, retinal vascular permeability.

Results

The 3 diagnostic groups were found to have significantly different permeability (P = 0.003). Despite having no clinical signs of retinopathy, the mean rank of average vascular E was significantly higher in DMnoDR subjects compared with healthy controls (P = 0.04), as was the mean rank of E for mild NPDR subjects (P = 0.002). The average E for mild NPDR, DMnoDR, and control subjects was 0.10 ± 0.04, 0.07 ± 0.04, and 0.04 ± 0.01, respectively.

Conclusions

The vascular permeability extracted from FVA datasets using the DTKM method is a promising biomarker for detecting preclinical retinal pathology in patients with diabetes. Longitudinal studies are ongoing to explore the ability of this biomarker to distinguish those subjects with diabetes who will progress to clinically apparent retinopathy from those who will not.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
无视网膜病变的糖尿病患者与轻度糖尿病视网膜病变及健康对照的视网膜血管通透性比较。
目的:探讨无视网膜病变体征和轻度非增殖性视网膜病变的糖尿病患者视网膜血管通透性定位作为糖尿病视网膜病变的潜在生物标志物。设计:这是一项病例对照研究。研究对象:7名健康对照,22名糖尿病无临床视网膜病变(DMnoDR)患者,7名轻度非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)患者。方法:所有参与者均接受常规视网膜荧光素血管造影(FVA)检查。使用动态示踪动力学模型(DTKM)方法对每个FVA数据集进行分析,以估计5个参数:提取分数(E),血流量,到达时间,传递时间和通过绝热溶液定义的速率常数。DTKM方法基于指标稀释理论,包括先后使用两种重要的动力学模型:塞流模型和组织均匀性模型的绝热近似。主要观察指标:采用DTKM法提取提取部分,即1次通过周围视网膜组织时测得的荧光素染料泄漏量,与视网膜血管通透性直接相关。因此,E代表临床前生物标志物,视网膜血管通透性。结果:3个诊断组通透性差异有统计学意义(P = 0.003)。尽管没有视网膜病变的临床症状,DMnoDR受试者的平均血管E的平均等级显著高于健康对照组(P = 0.04),轻度NPDR受试者的平均E等级也显著高于健康对照组(P = 0.002)。轻度NPDR、重度DMnoDR和对照组的平均E分别为0.10±0.04、0.07±0.04和0.04±0.01。结论:利用DTKM方法从FVA数据集中提取血管通透性是一种很有希望检测糖尿病患者临床前视网膜病理的生物标志物。目前正在进行纵向研究,以探索这种生物标志物区分糖尿病患者是否会发展为临床明显视网膜病变的能力。财务披露:专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信