State-wise variation and inequalities in caesarean delivery rates in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021) data

IF 5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rohini Dutta , Priyansh Nathani , Priti Patil , Rakhi Ghoshal , Shagun Tuli , Juul M. Bakker , Alex J. van Duinen , Nobhojit Roy , Adeline A. Boatin , Anita Gadgil
{"title":"State-wise variation and inequalities in caesarean delivery rates in India: analysis of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021) data","authors":"Rohini Dutta ,&nbsp;Priyansh Nathani ,&nbsp;Priti Patil ,&nbsp;Rakhi Ghoshal ,&nbsp;Shagun Tuli ,&nbsp;Juul M. Bakker ,&nbsp;Alex J. van Duinen ,&nbsp;Nobhojit Roy ,&nbsp;Adeline A. Boatin ,&nbsp;Anita Gadgil","doi":"10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>India’s caesarean delivery (CD) rate of 21.5% suggests adequate national access to CD but may mask significant disparities. We examined variation in CD rates across states (geography), wealth, and health care sector (public versus private). We also aimed to determine relative inequality in CD rates across wealth quintiles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The current study was a cross-sectional analysis of CD rates from the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021) disaggregated by asset-based household wealth quintiles for each state and by healthcare sector (public versus private). Data from 724,115 women aged 15–49 years across 28 states and eight union territories were analysed. Women who reported their most recent live birth within the past five years were included. Relative inequality was measured by comparing CD rates in the richest versus the poorest quintiles.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Disaggregating the national CD rate of 21.5% showed substantial variation in CD rate across states, ranging from 5.2% in Nagaland to 60.7% in Telangana and across wealth quintiles, ranging from 0% to 76.7% (Assam). CD facility rates were higher in private than public facilities across all wealth quintiles. Over two-thirds of states (69%) had at least twice the CD rate in the richest wealth quintile versus the poorest quintile. Relative inequality in CD rates between the richest and poorest was 5.3 nationally and was higher in public (4.0) versus private (1.4) facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The national CD rate in India masks complex geographical, wealth, and sector-related inequalities in CD utilisation. Accounting for these variations is imperative when interpreting national-level rates to better assess the equity in the distribution of CD services.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>None.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75136,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772368224001628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

India’s caesarean delivery (CD) rate of 21.5% suggests adequate national access to CD but may mask significant disparities. We examined variation in CD rates across states (geography), wealth, and health care sector (public versus private). We also aimed to determine relative inequality in CD rates across wealth quintiles.

Methods

The current study was a cross-sectional analysis of CD rates from the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021) disaggregated by asset-based household wealth quintiles for each state and by healthcare sector (public versus private). Data from 724,115 women aged 15–49 years across 28 states and eight union territories were analysed. Women who reported their most recent live birth within the past five years were included. Relative inequality was measured by comparing CD rates in the richest versus the poorest quintiles.

Findings

Disaggregating the national CD rate of 21.5% showed substantial variation in CD rate across states, ranging from 5.2% in Nagaland to 60.7% in Telangana and across wealth quintiles, ranging from 0% to 76.7% (Assam). CD facility rates were higher in private than public facilities across all wealth quintiles. Over two-thirds of states (69%) had at least twice the CD rate in the richest wealth quintile versus the poorest quintile. Relative inequality in CD rates between the richest and poorest was 5.3 nationally and was higher in public (4.0) versus private (1.4) facilities.

Interpretation

The national CD rate in India masks complex geographical, wealth, and sector-related inequalities in CD utilisation. Accounting for these variations is imperative when interpreting national-level rates to better assess the equity in the distribution of CD services.

Funding

None.
印度剖宫产率的各邦差异和不平等:对第5次全国家庭健康调查(2019-2021年)数据的分析。
背景:印度的剖宫产率为21.5%,这表明全国剖宫产可及性充足,但可能掩盖了显著的差异。我们检查了各州(地理)、财富和医疗保健部门(公共与私营)之间CD率的差异。我们还旨在确定财富五分位数中CD率的相对不平等。方法:目前的研究是对全国家庭健康调查-5(2019-2021)的CD率进行横断面分析,按每个州基于资产的家庭财富五分位数和医疗保健部门(公共与私营)分类。研究人员分析了来自28个邦和8个联邦属地的724,115名年龄在15-49岁之间的女性的数据。在过去五年内报告最近一次活产的妇女也包括在内。相对不平等是通过比较最富有的五分之一和最贫穷的五分之一的CD比率来衡量的。研究结果:对全国21.5%的慢性疾病发病率进行分类显示,不同邦的慢性疾病发病率差异很大,从那加兰邦的5.2%到特伦甘纳邦的60.7%不等,从0%到76.7%不等(阿萨姆邦)。在所有财富五分之一的人群中,私人机构的CD设施比率高于公共机构。超过三分之二的州(69%)最富有的五分之一人群的CD率至少是最贫穷的五分之一人群的两倍。在全国范围内,最富裕和最贫穷的人之间的CD率的相对不平等是5.3,在公共设施(4.0)比私人设施(1.4)更高。解释:印度的国家CD率掩盖了CD利用中复杂的地理、财富和部门相关的不平等。在解释国家一级费率以更好地评估CD服务分配的公平性时,必须考虑到这些差异。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信