Clinic evaluation of cognitive impairment in post-COVID syndrome: Performance on legacy pen-and-paper and new digital cognitive tests.

IF 3.7 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100917
Aysha Mohamed Rafik Patel, Gina Gilpin, Anna Koniotes, Catherine Warren, Cian Xu, Paul W Burgess, Dennis Chan
{"title":"Clinic evaluation of cognitive impairment in post-COVID syndrome: Performance on legacy pen-and-paper and new digital cognitive tests.","authors":"Aysha Mohamed Rafik Patel, Gina Gilpin, Anna Koniotes, Catherine Warren, Cian Xu, Paul W Burgess, Dennis Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment, colloquially termed \"brain fog\", is one of the most prevalent manifestations of post-Covid syndrome and a major contributor to impaired daily function and reduced quality of life. However, despite the high numbers of affected individuals presenting to clinical services with cognitive impairment, little work has been undertaken to date on the suitability of current memory clinic tests for identifying the cognitive deficits in this new acquired cognitive disorder.The aim of this study was therefore to determine the performance of people with post-Covid syndrome presenting with cognitive impairment on the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), a cognitive test used widely in memory clinics. A subset of individuals also underwent testing on a novel battery of short digital tests assessing attention, speed of information processing and executive function, representing the domains primarily implicated in post-Covid cognitive dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>102 individuals with post-Covid syndrome presenting with subjective cognitive complaints were recruited from a specialist cognitive long Covid clinic at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust. All participants completed self-report questionnaires on depression, anxiety, sleep and fatigue. Cognitive performance was assessed using the ACE-III, with 20 participants also being tested on the digital Long COVID Assessment Battery (LCCAB) (<i>N</i> = 20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall sample had a mean ACE-III score of 91/100 (SD 6) with 15.7% (16/102) scoring at or below the cut-off score considered to represent objective cognitive impairment. Of the 20 individuals who also completed the LCCAB, 89.47% were impaired on at least one task, primarily in the domains of attention, executive function and processing speed. Cognitive performance was not associated with depression, anxiety, sleep quality or fatigue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vast majority of individuals with post-Covid syndrome presenting with subjective cognitive complaints do not exhibit impaired performance on the ACE-III. This likely reflects the historical use of ACE-III and other pen and paper cognitive tests to detect cognitive impairment in diseases causing dementia, but they are ill-equipped to identify impairment in those cognitive domains affected in post-Covid syndrome. The LCCAB detected cognitive impairments in nearly 90% of participants, primarily affecting attention, executive function, and processing speed. These observations highlight the need for alternative cognitive tests for use in routine clinical practice to detect the impairments in new acquired cognitive disorders that are not adequately captured by legacy tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":72454,"journal":{"name":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","volume":"43 ","pages":"100917"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain, behavior, & immunity - health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment, colloquially termed "brain fog", is one of the most prevalent manifestations of post-Covid syndrome and a major contributor to impaired daily function and reduced quality of life. However, despite the high numbers of affected individuals presenting to clinical services with cognitive impairment, little work has been undertaken to date on the suitability of current memory clinic tests for identifying the cognitive deficits in this new acquired cognitive disorder.The aim of this study was therefore to determine the performance of people with post-Covid syndrome presenting with cognitive impairment on the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), a cognitive test used widely in memory clinics. A subset of individuals also underwent testing on a novel battery of short digital tests assessing attention, speed of information processing and executive function, representing the domains primarily implicated in post-Covid cognitive dysfunction.

Methods: 102 individuals with post-Covid syndrome presenting with subjective cognitive complaints were recruited from a specialist cognitive long Covid clinic at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust. All participants completed self-report questionnaires on depression, anxiety, sleep and fatigue. Cognitive performance was assessed using the ACE-III, with 20 participants also being tested on the digital Long COVID Assessment Battery (LCCAB) (N = 20).

Results: The overall sample had a mean ACE-III score of 91/100 (SD 6) with 15.7% (16/102) scoring at or below the cut-off score considered to represent objective cognitive impairment. Of the 20 individuals who also completed the LCCAB, 89.47% were impaired on at least one task, primarily in the domains of attention, executive function and processing speed. Cognitive performance was not associated with depression, anxiety, sleep quality or fatigue.

Conclusion: The vast majority of individuals with post-Covid syndrome presenting with subjective cognitive complaints do not exhibit impaired performance on the ACE-III. This likely reflects the historical use of ACE-III and other pen and paper cognitive tests to detect cognitive impairment in diseases causing dementia, but they are ill-equipped to identify impairment in those cognitive domains affected in post-Covid syndrome. The LCCAB detected cognitive impairments in nearly 90% of participants, primarily affecting attention, executive function, and processing speed. These observations highlight the need for alternative cognitive tests for use in routine clinical practice to detect the impairments in new acquired cognitive disorders that are not adequately captured by legacy tests.

新冠肺炎后认知障碍的临床评估:传统纸笔认知测试和新型数字认知测试的表现
背景:认知障碍俗称“脑雾”,是新冠肺炎后综合征最普遍的表现之一,也是日常功能受损和生活质量下降的主要原因。然而,尽管有大量受影响的个体在临床服务中表现出认知障碍,但迄今为止,关于当前记忆临床测试在识别这种新获得性认知障碍的认知缺陷方面的适用性,几乎没有开展任何工作。因此,本研究的目的是确定出现认知障碍的后冠状病毒综合征患者在阿登布鲁克认知检查- iii (ACE-III)中的表现,这是一项在记忆诊所广泛使用的认知测试。一部分人还接受了一组新的简短数字测试,评估注意力、信息处理速度和执行功能,这些测试代表了主要与新冠肺炎后认知功能障碍有关的领域。方法:从苏塞克斯大学医院NHS信托基金会的专家认知长冠状病毒诊所招募102名出现主观认知抱怨的后冠状病毒综合征患者。所有参与者都完成了关于抑郁、焦虑、睡眠和疲劳的自我报告问卷。使用ACE-III评估认知表现,20名参与者还接受了数字长COVID评估电池(LCCAB)的测试(N = 20)。结果:总体样本的ACE-III平均评分为91/100 (SD 6),其中15.7%(16/102)的评分处于或低于临界值,被认为代表客观认知障碍。在完成LCCAB的20名个体中,89.47%的人在至少一项任务上受损,主要是在注意力、执行功能和处理速度方面。认知表现与抑郁、焦虑、睡眠质量或疲劳无关。结论:绝大多数出现主观认知抱怨的后冠状病毒综合征患者在ACE-III测试中并未表现出受损的表现。这可能反映了ACE-III和其他笔和纸认知测试的历史使用,以检测导致痴呆的疾病中的认知障碍,但它们不足以识别受后冠状病毒综合征影响的认知领域的损伤。LCCAB检测到近90%的参与者存在认知障碍,主要影响注意力、执行功能和处理速度。这些观察结果强调了在常规临床实践中使用替代认知测试的必要性,以检测遗留测试无法充分捕获的新获得性认知障碍的损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health
Brain, behavior, & immunity - health Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
97 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信