Comparison of different disinfection protocols against contamination of ceramic surfaces with Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kaća Piletić, Silvestar Mežnarić, Eli Keržić, Martina Oder, Ivana Gobin
{"title":"Comparison of different disinfection protocols against contamination of ceramic surfaces with <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> biofilm.","authors":"Kaća Piletić, Silvestar Mežnarić, Eli Keržić, Martina Oder, Ivana Gobin","doi":"10.2478/aiht-2024-75-3920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental contamination with <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> biofilm can be a source of healthcare-associated infections. Disinfection with various biocidal active substances is usually the method of choice to remove contamination with biofilm. In this study we tested 13 different disinfection protocols using gaseous ozone, citric acid, and three working concentrations of benzalkonium chloride-based professional disinfecting products on 24-hour-old biofilms formed by two <i>K. pneumoniae</i> strains on ceramic tiles. All tested protocols significantly reduced total bacterial counts compared to control, varying from a log<sub>10</sub> CFU reduction factor of 1.4 to 5.6. Disinfection combining two or more biocidal active substances resulted in significantly better anti-biofilm efficacy than disinfection with single substances, and the most effective combination for both strains was that of citric acid, gaseous ozone, and benzalkonium chloride. This follow up study is limited to <i>K. pneumoniae</i> alone, and to overcome this limitation, future studies should include more bacterial species, both Gram-positive and Gramnegative, and more samples for us to find optimal disinfection protocols, applicable in real hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55462,"journal":{"name":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","volume":"75 4","pages":"289-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aiht-2024-75-3920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental contamination with Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm can be a source of healthcare-associated infections. Disinfection with various biocidal active substances is usually the method of choice to remove contamination with biofilm. In this study we tested 13 different disinfection protocols using gaseous ozone, citric acid, and three working concentrations of benzalkonium chloride-based professional disinfecting products on 24-hour-old biofilms formed by two K. pneumoniae strains on ceramic tiles. All tested protocols significantly reduced total bacterial counts compared to control, varying from a log10 CFU reduction factor of 1.4 to 5.6. Disinfection combining two or more biocidal active substances resulted in significantly better anti-biofilm efficacy than disinfection with single substances, and the most effective combination for both strains was that of citric acid, gaseous ozone, and benzalkonium chloride. This follow up study is limited to K. pneumoniae alone, and to overcome this limitation, future studies should include more bacterial species, both Gram-positive and Gramnegative, and more samples for us to find optimal disinfection protocols, applicable in real hospital settings.

不同消毒方案对陶瓷表面肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜污染的比较。
带有肺炎克雷伯菌生物膜的环境污染可能是卫生保健相关感染的一个来源。用各种生物杀灭活性物质消毒是去除生物膜污染的常用方法。在这项研究中,我们测试了13种不同的消毒方案,使用气态臭氧、柠檬酸和三种工作浓度的苯扎氯铵为基础的专业消毒产品,对两种肺炎克雷伯菌菌株在瓷砖上形成的24小时生物膜进行消毒。与对照组相比,所有测试方案都显著降低了细菌总数,从1.4到5.6的log10 CFU减少因子不等。两种或多种生物杀灭活性物质联合消毒的抗菌效果明显优于单一物质消毒,其中柠檬酸、气态臭氧和苯扎氯铵联合消毒的抗菌效果最好。这项后续研究仅限于肺炎克雷伯菌,为了克服这一局限性,未来的研究应该包括更多的细菌种类,包括革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性,以及更多的样本,以便我们找到适用于实际医院环境的最佳消毒方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
Arhiv Za Higijenu Rada I Toksikologiju-Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (abbr. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol) is a peer-reviewed biomedical scientific quarterly that publishes contributions relevant to all aspects of environmental and occupational health and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信