Depression and cardiovascular reactions to acute psychological stress: Is anhedonia the driver?

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Aoife Whiston, Tracey M Keogh, Siobhán Howard, Stephen Gallagher
{"title":"Depression and cardiovascular reactions to acute psychological stress: Is anhedonia the driver?","authors":"Aoife Whiston, Tracey M Keogh, Siobhán Howard, Stephen Gallagher","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blunted cardiovascular reactions in response to acute psychological stress are predictive of future health risk. A large body of research has identified depression as an influential factor associated with blunted cardiovascular reactivity. Separately, there has been a resurgence in focus on anhedonia as a key feature of depression, responsible for poor treatment responses to non-improvement in cardiac event-free survival. In a re-analysis of a previously published study that found depression to be associated with blunted systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate responses (HR), we used cross-sectional network models to examine if anhedonia symptoms were key drivers of this observation. Healthy young adults (N = 180) completed measures of depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) and had their blood pressure and heart rate monitored throughout a standardized stress testing protocol. Using network analysis, a Walktrap algorithm identified two clusters of depressive symptoms: anhedonia and non-anhedonia. These anhedonia symptoms of depression, but not the non-anhedonia symptoms, were associated with blunted SBP and HR reactivity, such that those scoring higher on HADS-D items capturing anhedonia displayed more blunted cardiovascular response profiles. Moreover, these findings were robust to adjustment for several covariates. This study adds greater clarity on the depression-cardiovascular reactivity to stress association, by demonstrating that anhedonia is a key driver of this observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"112492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112492","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blunted cardiovascular reactions in response to acute psychological stress are predictive of future health risk. A large body of research has identified depression as an influential factor associated with blunted cardiovascular reactivity. Separately, there has been a resurgence in focus on anhedonia as a key feature of depression, responsible for poor treatment responses to non-improvement in cardiac event-free survival. In a re-analysis of a previously published study that found depression to be associated with blunted systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate responses (HR), we used cross-sectional network models to examine if anhedonia symptoms were key drivers of this observation. Healthy young adults (N = 180) completed measures of depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) and had their blood pressure and heart rate monitored throughout a standardized stress testing protocol. Using network analysis, a Walktrap algorithm identified two clusters of depressive symptoms: anhedonia and non-anhedonia. These anhedonia symptoms of depression, but not the non-anhedonia symptoms, were associated with blunted SBP and HR reactivity, such that those scoring higher on HADS-D items capturing anhedonia displayed more blunted cardiovascular response profiles. Moreover, these findings were robust to adjustment for several covariates. This study adds greater clarity on the depression-cardiovascular reactivity to stress association, by demonstrating that anhedonia is a key driver of this observation.

急性心理压力下的抑郁和心血管反应:快感缺乏是驱动因素吗?
对急性心理压力反应迟钝的心血管反应可以预测未来的健康风险。大量的研究已经确定抑郁症是与心血管反应迟钝相关的一个影响因素。另外,作为抑郁症的一个关键特征,快感缺乏症再次受到关注,它是导致无心脏事件生存期治疗效果不佳的原因。在对先前发表的一项发现抑郁与收缩压(SBP)和心率反应(HR)相关的研究的重新分析中,我们使用横断面网络模型来检查快感缺乏症状是否是这一观察的关键驱动因素。健康的年轻人(N = 180)完成了抑郁症状的测量(医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)),并在标准化压力测试方案中监测了他们的血压和心率。通过网络分析,Walktrap算法确定了两类抑郁症状:快感缺乏和非快感缺乏。抑郁的这些快感缺乏症状,而非快感缺乏症状,与收缩压减弱和HR反应性相关,因此那些在HADS-D项目中得分较高的人表现出更迟钝的心血管反应谱。此外,这些发现对几个协变量的调整是稳健的。这项研究通过证明快感缺乏症是这一观察的关键驱动因素,进一步明确了抑郁症-心血管对压力的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信