The Value of LC-MS/MS in Apparent Bilateral Aldosterone Suppression in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Wei Li, Qixin Zhou, Yifan He, Wenwen He, Ying Song, Jinbo Hu, Yue Wang, Ting Luo, Qifu Li, Shumin Yang
{"title":"The Value of LC-MS/MS in Apparent Bilateral Aldosterone Suppression in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism.","authors":"Wei Li, Qixin Zhou, Yifan He, Wenwen He, Ying Song, Jinbo Hu, Yue Wang, Ting Luo, Qifu Li, Shumin Yang","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA), however, it is unreliable when apparent bilateral aldosterone suppression (ABAS) occurs, defined as aldosterone/cortisol ratio in the adrenal vein being bilaterally lower than that in the inferior vena cava. The value of Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in PA subtyping when ABAS occurs is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether LC-MS/MS can reduce the occurrence of ABAS and misdiagnosis of PA subtyping.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants and main outcome: </strong>Aldosterone and cortisol in AVS samples from 219 patients with PA were measured by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay. Then ABAS occurrence and misdiagnosis rate of PA subtyping were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 219 patients with PA, 111 and 60 received non-ACTH and ACTH-stimulated AVS, respectively, and 48 received both. In unstimulated AVS, LC-MS/MS reduced the ABAS occurrence compared to immunoassay [10.7% (17/159) vs. 3.1% (5/159)]. Among 159 patients with unstimulated AVS, there were 77 patients who had final subtyping diagnosis based on postoperative outcomes. The misdiagnosis rate of immunoassay and LC-MS/MS was 10.4% (8/77) and 9.1% (7/77), respectively. However, the misdiagnosis were more common in patients with ABAS than in those without ABAS. For immunoassay, five out of six ABAS patients were misdiagnosed, while 3/71 non-ABAS patients were misdiagnosed. For LC MS/MS, only one ABAS patient had follow-up outcome and he was misdiagnosed, while 6/76 non-ABAS patients were misdiagnosed. Similar results were found in ACTH-stimulated AVS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LC-MS/MS measurement of aldosterone and cortisol is a new resolution when ABAS occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA), however, it is unreliable when apparent bilateral aldosterone suppression (ABAS) occurs, defined as aldosterone/cortisol ratio in the adrenal vein being bilaterally lower than that in the inferior vena cava. The value of Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) in PA subtyping when ABAS occurs is unclear.

Objective: To determine whether LC-MS/MS can reduce the occurrence of ABAS and misdiagnosis of PA subtyping.

Design, setting, participants and main outcome: Aldosterone and cortisol in AVS samples from 219 patients with PA were measured by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay. Then ABAS occurrence and misdiagnosis rate of PA subtyping were calculated.

Results: Among 219 patients with PA, 111 and 60 received non-ACTH and ACTH-stimulated AVS, respectively, and 48 received both. In unstimulated AVS, LC-MS/MS reduced the ABAS occurrence compared to immunoassay [10.7% (17/159) vs. 3.1% (5/159)]. Among 159 patients with unstimulated AVS, there were 77 patients who had final subtyping diagnosis based on postoperative outcomes. The misdiagnosis rate of immunoassay and LC-MS/MS was 10.4% (8/77) and 9.1% (7/77), respectively. However, the misdiagnosis were more common in patients with ABAS than in those without ABAS. For immunoassay, five out of six ABAS patients were misdiagnosed, while 3/71 non-ABAS patients were misdiagnosed. For LC MS/MS, only one ABAS patient had follow-up outcome and he was misdiagnosed, while 6/76 non-ABAS patients were misdiagnosed. Similar results were found in ACTH-stimulated AVS.

Conclusion: LC-MS/MS measurement of aldosterone and cortisol is a new resolution when ABAS occurs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信