Systematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Adult Patients with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Dalal S Ali, Reza D Mirza, Farah Alsarraf, Salma Hussein, Hajar Abu Alrob, Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra, Signe Sparre Beck-Nielsen, Martin Biosse-Duplan, Maria Luisa Brandi, Thomas O Carpenter, Catherine Chaussain, Martine Cohen-Solal, Rachel K Crowley, Karel Dandurand, Pablo Florenzano, Seiji Fukumoto, Claudia Gagnon, Paul Goodyer, Corinna Grasemann, Erik A Imel, Suzanne M Jan de Beur, Anna Lehman, E Michael Lewiecki, Emmett Morgante, Leanne M Ward, Aliya A Khan, Gordon Guyatt
{"title":"Systematic Review: Efficacy of Medical Therapy on Outcomes Important to Adult Patients with X-Linked Hypophosphatemia.","authors":"Dalal S Ali, Reza D Mirza, Farah Alsarraf, Salma Hussein, Hajar Abu Alrob, Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra, Signe Sparre Beck-Nielsen, Martin Biosse-Duplan, Maria Luisa Brandi, Thomas O Carpenter, Catherine Chaussain, Martine Cohen-Solal, Rachel K Crowley, Karel Dandurand, Pablo Florenzano, Seiji Fukumoto, Claudia Gagnon, Paul Goodyer, Corinna Grasemann, Erik A Imel, Suzanne M Jan de Beur, Anna Lehman, E Michael Lewiecki, Emmett Morgante, Leanne M Ward, Aliya A Khan, Gordon Guyatt","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the highest certainty evidence addressing the management of X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adults to inform treatment recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central up to May 2023. Eligible studies included RCTs and observational studies of individuals 18+ with clinically or genetically confirmed XLH. Manuscripts comparing burosumab to no treatment or conventional therapy (phosphate and active vitamin D) and conventional therapy to no treatment were included. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). GRADE methodology was used to assess evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 4,114 records, after removing duplicates, and assessed 254 full texts. One RCT and two observational studies were eligible. The RCT of burosumab versus no treatment had low RoB. Burosumab probably improves pain from fracture/pseudofracture healing (moderate certainty) but has little or no impact on direct pain measures (moderate certainty). Burosumab may reduce the need for parathyroidectomy (low certainty) but has little or no impact on fatigue (high certainty), stiffness (moderate certainty), and mobility (low certainty) over 24 weeks. Burosumab may increase dental abscess risk (low certainty). Indirect evidence comparing burosumab to conventional therapy provided low certainty regarding burosumab versus conventional therapy. Two observational studies on conventional therapy versus no treatment had high RoB and very low certainty regarding the impact of conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No formal comparisons between burosumab and conventional therapy in adults exist. Evidence for conventional therapy versus no treatment is very uncertain. Our review highlights the need for more data on the long-term effects of burosumab and conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes in adult patients with XLH.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae890","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the highest certainty evidence addressing the management of X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adults to inform treatment recommendations.

Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central up to May 2023. Eligible studies included RCTs and observational studies of individuals 18+ with clinically or genetically confirmed XLH. Manuscripts comparing burosumab to no treatment or conventional therapy (phosphate and active vitamin D) and conventional therapy to no treatment were included. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). GRADE methodology was used to assess evidence certainty.

Results: We screened 4,114 records, after removing duplicates, and assessed 254 full texts. One RCT and two observational studies were eligible. The RCT of burosumab versus no treatment had low RoB. Burosumab probably improves pain from fracture/pseudofracture healing (moderate certainty) but has little or no impact on direct pain measures (moderate certainty). Burosumab may reduce the need for parathyroidectomy (low certainty) but has little or no impact on fatigue (high certainty), stiffness (moderate certainty), and mobility (low certainty) over 24 weeks. Burosumab may increase dental abscess risk (low certainty). Indirect evidence comparing burosumab to conventional therapy provided low certainty regarding burosumab versus conventional therapy. Two observational studies on conventional therapy versus no treatment had high RoB and very low certainty regarding the impact of conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes.

Conclusion: No formal comparisons between burosumab and conventional therapy in adults exist. Evidence for conventional therapy versus no treatment is very uncertain. Our review highlights the need for more data on the long-term effects of burosumab and conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes in adult patients with XLH.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信