Establishing a unified global framework for studying dementia knowledge: insights from a narrative review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sophia Lazarova, Dessislava Petrova-Antonova
{"title":"Establishing a unified global framework for studying dementia knowledge: insights from a narrative review.","authors":"Sophia Lazarova, Dessislava Petrova-Antonova","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01476-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the global population aging rapidly, dementia has become a pressing public health challenge, affecting the cognitive functions and daily activities of older adults worldwide. Enhancing literacy about dementia is a proactive prevention strategy, yet the effectiveness of educational programs can vary based on the target population's background. Thus, understanding dementia knowledge levels across different communities and countries is essential for successful educational interventions. Despite the large аmount of studies, there is no common framework for studying dementia knowledge, leading to significant variability in methods and poor data comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review is conducted to examine the methodological variability in studies of dementia knowledge and to propose a unified framework for future investigations. We hypothesize that significant differences will be evident in the methodologies employed, particularly regarding knowledge domains, research designs, influencing factors, and assessments of attitudes toward dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 research publications published after 2000 were selected, revealing significant variability in approaches to studying dementia knowledge and confirming our hypothesis. We identified eight dementia knowledge domains and various sociodemographic and experiential correlates, along with commonly used complementary assessments. These findings were organized into a unified global framework comprising two core components-dementia knowledge domains and correlates-supplemented by a component addressing affective dispositions towards dementia and an action list to guide future research. The framework aims to provide a foundational basis for enhancing inter-study comparisons and deepening our understanding of dementia knowledge and attitudes across diverse communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aligning methodologies for surveying dementia knowledge through a common framework can empower stakeholders to implement effective educational programs, fostering an informed and supportive environment for individuals affected by dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01476-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the global population aging rapidly, dementia has become a pressing public health challenge, affecting the cognitive functions and daily activities of older adults worldwide. Enhancing literacy about dementia is a proactive prevention strategy, yet the effectiveness of educational programs can vary based on the target population's background. Thus, understanding dementia knowledge levels across different communities and countries is essential for successful educational interventions. Despite the large аmount of studies, there is no common framework for studying dementia knowledge, leading to significant variability in methods and poor data comparability.

Methods: A narrative review is conducted to examine the methodological variability in studies of dementia knowledge and to propose a unified framework for future investigations. We hypothesize that significant differences will be evident in the methodologies employed, particularly regarding knowledge domains, research designs, influencing factors, and assessments of attitudes toward dementia.

Results: A total of 59 research publications published after 2000 were selected, revealing significant variability in approaches to studying dementia knowledge and confirming our hypothesis. We identified eight dementia knowledge domains and various sociodemographic and experiential correlates, along with commonly used complementary assessments. These findings were organized into a unified global framework comprising two core components-dementia knowledge domains and correlates-supplemented by a component addressing affective dispositions towards dementia and an action list to guide future research. The framework aims to provide a foundational basis for enhancing inter-study comparisons and deepening our understanding of dementia knowledge and attitudes across diverse communities.

Conclusion: Aligning methodologies for surveying dementia knowledge through a common framework can empower stakeholders to implement effective educational programs, fostering an informed and supportive environment for individuals affected by dementia.

建立研究痴呆症知识的统一全球框架:来自叙述性回顾的见解。
背景:随着全球人口老龄化的快速发展,痴呆症已成为一项紧迫的公共卫生挑战,影响着全球老年人的认知功能和日常活动。提高对痴呆症的认识是一项积极的预防策略,但教育计划的有效性可能因目标人群的背景而异。因此,了解不同社区和国家的痴呆症知识水平对于成功的教育干预至关重要。尽管有大量的研究,但没有一个共同的框架来研究痴呆症知识,导致方法的显著差异和数据的可比性差。方法:对痴呆知识研究的方法可变性进行了叙述性回顾,并为未来的调查提出了统一的框架。我们假设,在所采用的方法上,特别是在知识领域、研究设计、影响因素和对痴呆症态度的评估方面,显著的差异将是显而易见的。结果:共选择了2000年以后发表的59篇研究出版物,揭示了痴呆症知识研究方法的显著差异,并证实了我们的假设。我们确定了8个痴呆症知识领域和各种社会人口统计学和经验相关性,以及常用的补充评估。这些发现被组织成一个统一的全球框架,包括两个核心组成部分——痴呆症知识领域和相关知识,辅以一个解决痴呆症情感倾向的组成部分和一个指导未来研究的行动清单。该框架旨在为加强研究间比较和加深我们对不同社区痴呆症知识和态度的理解提供基础基础。结论:通过一个共同框架调整痴呆症知识调查的方法,可以使利益相关者能够实施有效的教育计划,为痴呆症患者营造一个知情和支持性的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信