Combination checkpoint blockade and laser interstitial thermal therapy in radiographically progressive non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae207
Aden P Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan S Srinivasan, Ariel T Gonzalez, Ellery H Reason, Joshua D Jackson, Ann Marie Flusche, Lucas P Wachsmuth, Emily Lerner, Delaney Underwood, Evan D Buckley, Saif E Zaidi, James E Herndon, Peter E Fecci
{"title":"Combination checkpoint blockade and laser interstitial thermal therapy in radiographically progressive non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.","authors":"Aden P Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan S Srinivasan, Ariel T Gonzalez, Ellery H Reason, Joshua D Jackson, Ann Marie Flusche, Lucas P Wachsmuth, Emily Lerner, Delaney Underwood, Evan D Buckley, Saif E Zaidi, James E Herndon, Peter E Fecci","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment being employed frequently for radiographically progressive brain metastases. Considerable interest exists in combining LITT-mediated in situ vaccination to license immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No studies have examined the clinical feasibility of this combination in brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients receiving LITT for radiographically progressive non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) brain metastases at a single center from 2015 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Combination therapy was defined as ICB within 6 weeks of LITT. Clinical data, post-LITT freedom from local progression, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients received LITT + ICB for a total of 19 lesions. The median time between therapies was 2.29 weeks (range 0.85-5.98). In comparison to NSCLC patients receiving LITT alone or with targeted therapy (LITT only) (<i>n</i> = 25), there was no decrement in procedural outcomes. Patients receiving LITT + ICB discontinued steroids at a median of 11 (4-147) days post-LITT vs. 24 (3-242) days for patients receiving LITT only (<i>P</i> = .62). At study cutoff, the local control rate was 18/19 (94.7%) lesions in the LITT + ICB group and 22/25 (88.0%) in the LITT only group. There were 3 and 5 AEs ≥Grade 3 in the LITT + ICB and LITT-only groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination of LITT and ICB does not compromise procedural outcomes or time to steroid discontinuation in NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to assess biomarkers of immune response.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment being employed frequently for radiographically progressive brain metastases. Considerable interest exists in combining LITT-mediated in situ vaccination to license immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No studies have examined the clinical feasibility of this combination in brain metastases.

Methods: All patients receiving LITT for radiographically progressive non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) brain metastases at a single center from 2015 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Combination therapy was defined as ICB within 6 weeks of LITT. Clinical data, post-LITT freedom from local progression, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria.

Results: Eighteen patients received LITT + ICB for a total of 19 lesions. The median time between therapies was 2.29 weeks (range 0.85-5.98). In comparison to NSCLC patients receiving LITT alone or with targeted therapy (LITT only) (n = 25), there was no decrement in procedural outcomes. Patients receiving LITT + ICB discontinued steroids at a median of 11 (4-147) days post-LITT vs. 24 (3-242) days for patients receiving LITT only (P = .62). At study cutoff, the local control rate was 18/19 (94.7%) lesions in the LITT + ICB group and 22/25 (88.0%) in the LITT only group. There were 3 and 5 AEs ≥Grade 3 in the LITT + ICB and LITT-only groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Combination of LITT and ICB does not compromise procedural outcomes or time to steroid discontinuation in NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to assess biomarkers of immune response.

检查点阻断联合激光间质热治疗在影像学进展性非小细胞肺癌脑转移中的应用。
背景:激光间质热治疗(LITT)是一种微创手术治疗,经常用于放射学进展性脑转移。人们对将litt介导的原位疫苗接种与免疫检查点阻断(ICB)相结合有着相当大的兴趣。目前还没有研究检验这种联合治疗脑转移瘤的临床可行性。方法:回顾性分析2015年至2023年在单中心接受LITT治疗的影像学进展性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者。联合治疗定义为LITT后6周内的ICB。收集临床数据,litt后无局部进展和总生存期(OS)。不良事件(ae)根据通用术语标准进行评估。结果:18例患者接受了LITT + ICB治疗,共19个病灶。治疗间隔的中位时间为2.29周(范围0.85-5.98)。与单独接受LITT或靶向治疗(仅接受LITT)的非小细胞肺癌患者(n = 25)相比,手术预后没有下降。接受LITT + ICB的患者在LITT后中位数为11(4-147)天停用类固醇,而仅接受LITT的患者为24(3-242)天(P = 0.62)。在研究结束时,LITT + ICB组的局部控制率为18/19(94.7%)个病灶,单独LITT组的局部控制率为22/25(88.0%)个病灶。LITT + ICB组和仅LITT组分别有3例和5例ae≥3级。结论:LITT和ICB联合使用不会影响NSCLC的手术结果或停药时间。需要前瞻性研究来评估免疫反应的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信