Aden P Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan S Srinivasan, Ariel T Gonzalez, Ellery H Reason, Joshua D Jackson, Ann Marie Flusche, Lucas P Wachsmuth, Emily Lerner, Delaney Underwood, Evan D Buckley, Saif E Zaidi, James E Herndon, Peter E Fecci
{"title":"Combination checkpoint blockade and laser interstitial thermal therapy in radiographically progressive non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.","authors":"Aden P Haskell-Mendoza, Ethan S Srinivasan, Ariel T Gonzalez, Ellery H Reason, Joshua D Jackson, Ann Marie Flusche, Lucas P Wachsmuth, Emily Lerner, Delaney Underwood, Evan D Buckley, Saif E Zaidi, James E Herndon, Peter E Fecci","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment being employed frequently for radiographically progressive brain metastases. Considerable interest exists in combining LITT-mediated in situ vaccination to license immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No studies have examined the clinical feasibility of this combination in brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients receiving LITT for radiographically progressive non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) brain metastases at a single center from 2015 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Combination therapy was defined as ICB within 6 weeks of LITT. Clinical data, post-LITT freedom from local progression, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen patients received LITT + ICB for a total of 19 lesions. The median time between therapies was 2.29 weeks (range 0.85-5.98). In comparison to NSCLC patients receiving LITT alone or with targeted therapy (LITT only) (<i>n</i> = 25), there was no decrement in procedural outcomes. Patients receiving LITT + ICB discontinued steroids at a median of 11 (4-147) days post-LITT vs. 24 (3-242) days for patients receiving LITT only (<i>P</i> = .62). At study cutoff, the local control rate was 18/19 (94.7%) lesions in the LITT + ICB group and 22/25 (88.0%) in the LITT only group. There were 3 and 5 AEs ≥Grade 3 in the LITT + ICB and LITT-only groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination of LITT and ICB does not compromise procedural outcomes or time to steroid discontinuation in NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to assess biomarkers of immune response.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical treatment being employed frequently for radiographically progressive brain metastases. Considerable interest exists in combining LITT-mediated in situ vaccination to license immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). No studies have examined the clinical feasibility of this combination in brain metastases.
Methods: All patients receiving LITT for radiographically progressive non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) brain metastases at a single center from 2015 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Combination therapy was defined as ICB within 6 weeks of LITT. Clinical data, post-LITT freedom from local progression, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria.
Results: Eighteen patients received LITT + ICB for a total of 19 lesions. The median time between therapies was 2.29 weeks (range 0.85-5.98). In comparison to NSCLC patients receiving LITT alone or with targeted therapy (LITT only) (n = 25), there was no decrement in procedural outcomes. Patients receiving LITT + ICB discontinued steroids at a median of 11 (4-147) days post-LITT vs. 24 (3-242) days for patients receiving LITT only (P = .62). At study cutoff, the local control rate was 18/19 (94.7%) lesions in the LITT + ICB group and 22/25 (88.0%) in the LITT only group. There were 3 and 5 AEs ≥Grade 3 in the LITT + ICB and LITT-only groups, respectively.
Conclusions: Combination of LITT and ICB does not compromise procedural outcomes or time to steroid discontinuation in NSCLC. Prospective studies are needed to assess biomarkers of immune response.