Cortical Beta Power Reflects the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision-Making.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Gianluca Finotti, Luigi A E Degni, Marco Badioli, Daniela Dalbagno, Francesca Starita, Lara Bardi, Yulong Huang, Junjie Wei, Angela Sirigu, Valeria Gazzola, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo
{"title":"Cortical Beta Power Reflects the Influence of Pavlovian Cues on Human Decision-Making.","authors":"Gianluca Finotti, Luigi A E Degni, Marco Badioli, Daniela Dalbagno, Francesca Starita, Lara Bardi, Yulong Huang, Junjie Wei, Angela Sirigu, Valeria Gazzola, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Sara Garofalo","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0414-24.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reward-predictive cues can affect decision-making by enhancing instrumental responses toward the same (specific transfer) or similar (general transfer) rewards. The main theories on cue-guided decision-making consider specific transfer as driven by the activation of previously learned instrumental actions induced by cues sharing the sensory-specific properties of the reward they are associated with. However, to date, such theoretical assumption has never been directly investigated at the neural level. We hypothesize that such reactivation occurs within the premotor system and could be mapped by lateralized beta (12-30 Hz) desynchronization, a widely used marker of action selection and decision-making policy. To test this hypothesis, 42 participants (22 females) performed a pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer paradigm, while electroencephalographic activity was recorded. We anticipated increased beta desynchronization during the transfer phase when cues promoting specific transfer were presented, compared with cues predicting general transfer and neutral cues. The evidence collected confirmed our hypothesis, thus providing the first neural evidence in favor of the theorized reactivation of instrumental actions and corroborating the presence of two dissociable neural pathways underpinning specific and general transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0414-24.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reward-predictive cues can affect decision-making by enhancing instrumental responses toward the same (specific transfer) or similar (general transfer) rewards. The main theories on cue-guided decision-making consider specific transfer as driven by the activation of previously learned instrumental actions induced by cues sharing the sensory-specific properties of the reward they are associated with. However, to date, such theoretical assumption has never been directly investigated at the neural level. We hypothesize that such reactivation occurs within the premotor system and could be mapped by lateralized beta (12-30 Hz) desynchronization, a widely used marker of action selection and decision-making policy. To test this hypothesis, 42 participants (22 females) performed a pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer paradigm, while electroencephalographic activity was recorded. We anticipated increased beta desynchronization during the transfer phase when cues promoting specific transfer were presented, compared with cues predicting general transfer and neutral cues. The evidence collected confirmed our hypothesis, thus providing the first neural evidence in favor of the theorized reactivation of instrumental actions and corroborating the presence of two dissociable neural pathways underpinning specific and general transfer.

大脑皮层的β能力反映了巴甫洛夫暗示对人类决策的影响。
奖励预测线索可以通过增强对相同(特定转移)或相似(一般转移)奖励的工具性反应来影响决策。关于线索引导决策的主要理论认为,特定迁移是由先前学习的工具行为的激活所驱动的,这些行为是由分享与之相关的奖励的感觉特异性特征的线索所诱导的。然而,到目前为止,这种理论假设还没有在神经水平上得到直接的研究。我们假设这种再激活发生在前运动系统中,可以通过侧化β (12-30 Hz)去同步来映射,这是一种广泛使用的行动选择和决策政策的标记。为了验证这一假设,42名参与者(22名女性)进行了巴甫洛夫-工具转移范式,同时记录了脑电图(EEG)活动。我们预计,与预测一般迁移和中性迁移的线索相比,在迁移阶段,促进特异性迁移的线索会增加β非同步化。收集到的证据证实了我们的假设,从而提供了第一个支持工具性动作理论化再激活的神经证据,并证实了支持特定和一般转移的两个可分离的神经通路的存在。我们的研究提供了直接证据,证明巴甫洛夫(奖励预测)线索可以通过两个独立且可分离的途径影响决策:一是线索传递关于即将发生的结果的感觉-运动信息的能力,并由运动前系统介导(特异性转移);另一个是线索通过增加动机唤醒间接影响表现的能力,并且似乎独立于运动前活动(一般转移)。本研究结果将对决策和联想学习的研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信