Automated pediatric brain tumor imaging assessment tool from CBTN: Enhancing suprasellar region inclusion and managing limited data with deep learning.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae190
Deep B Gandhi, Nastaran Khalili, Ariana M Familiar, Anurag Gottipati, Neda Khalili, Wenxin Tu, Shuvanjan Haldar, Hannah Anderson, Karthik Viswanathan, Phillip B Storm, Jeffrey B Ware, Adam Resnick, Arastoo Vossough, Ali Nabavizadeh, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
{"title":"Automated pediatric brain tumor imaging assessment tool from CBTN: Enhancing suprasellar region inclusion and managing limited data with deep learning.","authors":"Deep B Gandhi, Nastaran Khalili, Ariana M Familiar, Anurag Gottipati, Neda Khalili, Wenxin Tu, Shuvanjan Haldar, Hannah Anderson, Karthik Viswanathan, Phillip B Storm, Jeffrey B Ware, Adam Resnick, Arastoo Vossough, Ali Nabavizadeh, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fully automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (<i>n</i> = 336 for skull-stripping, <i>n</i> = 489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired 2-sample <i>t</i>-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98 ± 0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearson's correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (<i>r</i> > 0.80; <i>P</i> < .05 for all). Whole tumor Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84 ± 0.17 (median = 0.90) for T2 and 0.82 ± 0.19 (median = 0.89) for FLAIR inputs. Enhancing tumor Dice scores were 0.65 ± 0.35 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64 ± 0.36 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and ET regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"6 1","pages":"vdae190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fully automatic skull-stripping and tumor segmentation are crucial for monitoring pediatric brain tumors (PBT). Current methods, however, often lack generalizability, particularly for rare tumors in the sellar/suprasellar regions and when applied to real-world clinical data in limited data scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose AI-driven techniques for skull-stripping and tumor segmentation.

Methods: Multi-institutional, multi-parametric MRI scans from 527 pediatric patients (n = 336 for skull-stripping, n = 489 for tumor segmentation) with various PBT histologies were processed to train separate nnU-Net-based deep learning models for skull-stripping, whole tumor (WT), and enhancing tumor (ET) segmentation. These models utilized single (T2/FLAIR) or multiple (T1-Gd and T2/FLAIR) input imaging sequences. Performance was evaluated using Dice scores, sensitivity, and 95% Hausdorff distances. Statistical comparisons included paired or unpaired 2-sample t-tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient based on Dice scores from different models and PBT histologies.

Results: Dice scores for the skull-stripping models for whole brain and sellar/suprasellar region segmentation were 0.98 ± 0.01 (median 0.98) for both multi- and single-parametric models, with significant Pearson's correlation coefficient between single- and multi-parametric Dice scores (r > 0.80; P < .05 for all). Whole tumor Dice scores for single-input tumor segmentation models were 0.84 ± 0.17 (median = 0.90) for T2 and 0.82 ± 0.19 (median = 0.89) for FLAIR inputs. Enhancing tumor Dice scores were 0.65 ± 0.35 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+FLAIR and 0.64 ± 0.36 (median = 0.79) for T1-Gd+T2 inputs.

Conclusion: Our skull-stripping models demonstrate excellent performance and include sellar/suprasellar regions, using single- or multi-parametric inputs. Additionally, our automated tumor segmentation models can reliably delineate whole lesions and ET regions, adapting to MRI sessions with missing sequences in limited data context.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信