The middle meningeal artery Patency After Coil Embolization (PACE) score: A novel descriptor of angiographic occlusion.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nicholas S Hernandez, Ryan W Sindewald, Michael G Brandel, Arvin R Wali, Nikhil K Murthy, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander A Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa
{"title":"The middle meningeal artery Patency After Coil Embolization (PACE) score: A novel descriptor of angiographic occlusion.","authors":"Nicholas S Hernandez, Ryan W Sindewald, Michael G Brandel, Arvin R Wali, Nikhil K Murthy, Jeffrey A Steinberg, Jeffrey S Pannell, Alexander A Khalessi, David R Santiago-Dieppa","doi":"10.1177/15910199241308324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A scoring system to characterize the efficacy of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is lacking and would help predict the likelihood of subdural hematoma resolution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a simple angiographic classification system ranging from 0 to 3 for quantifying MMA Patency After Coil Embolization (PACE) based residual flow distal to the embolization. MMA embolizations using coils at our institution were used to validate the PACE score system using procedural angiograms. Follow-up CT scans following embolization were reviewed for acute blood products, and to characterize long-term resolution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>60 patients were included in the study, with a total of 80 subdural hematomas with follow-up imaging that were available for analysis. 37 patients had a PACE score of 0, 18 had a PACE score of 1, 4 had a PACE score of 2, and 1 had a PACE score of 3. The presence of acute blood products was significantly lower in PACE 0 compared to PACE 1, 2, or 3. The cross-sectional area of the chronic subdural collections was statistically lower on follow-up CT scans after coil embolization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coil embolization of the MMA may reduce the incidence of acute blood products after embolization and decrease the cross-sectional area of chronic subdural hematoma on long-term follow-up. Lower PACE scores may correlate with lower rates of acute blood products after the procedure and increased resolution of chronic subdural hematoma on follow-up. A larger cohort is required to characterize the superiority between the PACE scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241308324"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241308324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A scoring system to characterize the efficacy of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is lacking and would help predict the likelihood of subdural hematoma resolution.

Methods: We developed a simple angiographic classification system ranging from 0 to 3 for quantifying MMA Patency After Coil Embolization (PACE) based residual flow distal to the embolization. MMA embolizations using coils at our institution were used to validate the PACE score system using procedural angiograms. Follow-up CT scans following embolization were reviewed for acute blood products, and to characterize long-term resolution.

Results: 60 patients were included in the study, with a total of 80 subdural hematomas with follow-up imaging that were available for analysis. 37 patients had a PACE score of 0, 18 had a PACE score of 1, 4 had a PACE score of 2, and 1 had a PACE score of 3. The presence of acute blood products was significantly lower in PACE 0 compared to PACE 1, 2, or 3. The cross-sectional area of the chronic subdural collections was statistically lower on follow-up CT scans after coil embolization.

Conclusions: Coil embolization of the MMA may reduce the incidence of acute blood products after embolization and decrease the cross-sectional area of chronic subdural hematoma on long-term follow-up. Lower PACE scores may correlate with lower rates of acute blood products after the procedure and increased resolution of chronic subdural hematoma on follow-up. A larger cohort is required to characterize the superiority between the PACE scores.

螺旋栓塞后脑膜中动脉通畅度(PACE)评分:一种新的血管造影闭塞描述符。
目前缺乏一种评价脑膜中动脉(MMA)栓塞疗效的评分系统,该评分系统将有助于预测硬膜下血肿消退的可能性。方法:我们开发了一个简单的血管造影分类系统,范围从0到3,用于量化MMA通畅后线圈栓塞(PACE)基于栓塞远端残余血流。在我们的机构使用线圈MMA栓塞来验证PACE评分系统的程序性血管造影。随访CT扫描栓塞后的急性血液制品进行审查,并表征长期解决。结果:60例患者纳入研究,共有80例硬膜下血肿,随访影像可用于分析。37例患者的PACE评分为0,18例为1,4例为2,1例为3。与PACE 1、2和3相比,PACE 0中急性血液制品的存在显著降低。在线圈栓塞后的随访CT扫描中,慢性硬膜下积液的横截面积有统计学意义上的降低。结论:经长期随访,线圈栓塞MMA可降低栓塞后急性血产物的发生率,减少慢性硬膜下血肿的横截面积。较低的PACE评分可能与手术后较低的急性血制品率和随访中慢性硬膜下血肿的消退有关。需要一个更大的队列来表征PACE分数之间的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信