Colorectal Cancer Messaging and Gaps in Knowledge Among Screening-Eligible Individuals.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ginny E Kincaid, Carolyn Headley, Anna Jaffee, Bria Marlowe, Ally Moehring, Will A Murphy, Laura K Vercammen
{"title":"Colorectal Cancer Messaging and Gaps in Knowledge Among Screening-Eligible Individuals.","authors":"Ginny E Kincaid, Carolyn Headley, Anna Jaffee, Bria Marlowe, Ally Moehring, Will A Murphy, Laura K Vercammen","doi":"10.1177/15248399241306409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shifts in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, including guidance from the United States Preventive Services Task Force lowering the recommended screening age from 50 to 45 years in 2021, may leave gaps in clinicians' understanding of related barriers and beliefs held by patients. This study uses the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to analyze factors influencing CRC screening uptake among individuals aged 44-54 years and identifies how gaps in knowledge intersect with screening barriers, particularly as they relate to the health care system and sociocultural environment. In 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control's Screen for Life campaign conducted 12 online focus groups to gather audience insights and test materials. Researchers conducted the focus groups in English and Spanish with individuals aged 44-54 years who had never had CRC and had never received a CRC screening. Focus groups gauged participants' knowledge, awareness, and behavior pertaining to CRC and CRC screening. Results show that participants often lacked knowledge about risk factors and screening modalities and appreciated emotionally resonant communication approaches that addressed gaps in knowledge using demystifying, destigmatizing language and representative imagery. Findings also indicate a need to help patients overcome barriers related to insurance coverage, treatment options, and discrimination. Results may guide the development of future health promotion efforts and empower health care providers to approach conversations with their patients with additional context regarding patients' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241306409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241306409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shifts in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, including guidance from the United States Preventive Services Task Force lowering the recommended screening age from 50 to 45 years in 2021, may leave gaps in clinicians' understanding of related barriers and beliefs held by patients. This study uses the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to analyze factors influencing CRC screening uptake among individuals aged 44-54 years and identifies how gaps in knowledge intersect with screening barriers, particularly as they relate to the health care system and sociocultural environment. In 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control's Screen for Life campaign conducted 12 online focus groups to gather audience insights and test materials. Researchers conducted the focus groups in English and Spanish with individuals aged 44-54 years who had never had CRC and had never received a CRC screening. Focus groups gauged participants' knowledge, awareness, and behavior pertaining to CRC and CRC screening. Results show that participants often lacked knowledge about risk factors and screening modalities and appreciated emotionally resonant communication approaches that addressed gaps in knowledge using demystifying, destigmatizing language and representative imagery. Findings also indicate a need to help patients overcome barriers related to insurance coverage, treatment options, and discrimination. Results may guide the development of future health promotion efforts and empower health care providers to approach conversations with their patients with additional context regarding patients' needs.

在符合筛查条件的人群中,结直肠癌信息传递和知识差距。
结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的转变,包括美国预防服务工作组(United States Preventive Services Task Force)在2021年将推荐筛查年龄从50岁降低到45岁的指南,可能会在临床医生对相关障碍和患者持有的信念的理解上留下空白。本研究使用国家少数民族健康和健康差异研究框架研究所来分析影响44-54岁人群CRC筛查的因素,并确定知识差距如何与筛查障碍相交,特别是当它们与卫生保健系统和社会文化环境相关时。2022年,美国疾病控制与预防中心癌症预防与控制部门的“生命筛查”活动开展了12个在线焦点小组,以收集受众的见解和测试材料。研究人员用英语和西班牙语对44-54岁从未患过结直肠癌且从未接受过结直肠癌筛查的个体进行了焦点小组研究。焦点小组评估参与者关于CRC和CRC筛查的知识、意识和行为。结果表明,参与者往往缺乏对风险因素和筛查方式的了解,并欣赏情感共鸣的沟通方式,这些沟通方式使用去神秘化、去污名化的语言和代表性图像来解决知识差距。研究结果还表明,需要帮助患者克服与保险范围、治疗选择和歧视有关的障碍。结果可以指导未来健康促进工作的发展,并授权卫生保健提供者在与患者进行对话时考虑患者需求的额外背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信