An evaluation of syphilis partner services among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men with early syphilis in King County, WA.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Roxanne P Kerani, Alene Chang, Anna Berzkalns, Juan Palacios Moreno, Meena Ramchandani, Matthew R Golden
{"title":"An evaluation of syphilis partner services among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men with early syphilis in King County, WA.","authors":"Roxanne P Kerani, Alene Chang, Anna Berzkalns, Juan Palacios Moreno, Meena Ramchandani, Matthew R Golden","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partner services (PS) have been integral to syphilis control in the U.S. since the early 20th century but have not been evaluated in a controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared PS outcomes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) diagnosed with syphilis from May 2020-June 2021 for whom health department staff initiated PS efforts (PS group) and a randomly selected control group for whom no PS efforts were initiated. We interviewed participants about partner outcomes and used chi-square tests and Poisson regression to test for differences in outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We attempted to contact 350 GBMSM and offered participation to 184 men, of whom 92 (51%) participated, including 41 men in the PS group and 51 controls. The percentage of participants who reported notifying >1 sex partner after diagnosis was similar in the PS and control groups (83% vs. 80%, p = 0.80). Mean number of partners notified or tested did not differ between PS and control groups (notified mean[range]: 2.5 [0-10] vs 3.3 [0-20], p = 0.16; tested mean[range]: 1.2 [0-8] vs. 1 [0-10], p = 0.66); multivariate results were similar. Among those contacted for PS, approximately half (48%) reported PS staff helped them with medical care for syphilis, and 31% said that PS staff connected them to PrEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This small, controlled evaluation suggests that syphilis PS may have no impact on partner treatment among GBMSM, though most men support the intervention. A randomized trial is needed to definitively define the contemporary effectiveness of syphilis PS among GBMSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partner services (PS) have been integral to syphilis control in the U.S. since the early 20th century but have not been evaluated in a controlled study.

Methods: We compared PS outcomes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) diagnosed with syphilis from May 2020-June 2021 for whom health department staff initiated PS efforts (PS group) and a randomly selected control group for whom no PS efforts were initiated. We interviewed participants about partner outcomes and used chi-square tests and Poisson regression to test for differences in outcomes between groups.

Results: We attempted to contact 350 GBMSM and offered participation to 184 men, of whom 92 (51%) participated, including 41 men in the PS group and 51 controls. The percentage of participants who reported notifying >1 sex partner after diagnosis was similar in the PS and control groups (83% vs. 80%, p = 0.80). Mean number of partners notified or tested did not differ between PS and control groups (notified mean[range]: 2.5 [0-10] vs 3.3 [0-20], p = 0.16; tested mean[range]: 1.2 [0-8] vs. 1 [0-10], p = 0.66); multivariate results were similar. Among those contacted for PS, approximately half (48%) reported PS staff helped them with medical care for syphilis, and 31% said that PS staff connected them to PrEP.

Conclusions: This small, controlled evaluation suggests that syphilis PS may have no impact on partner treatment among GBMSM, though most men support the intervention. A randomized trial is needed to definitively define the contemporary effectiveness of syphilis PS among GBMSM.

华盛顿州金县男同性恋、双性恋和其他与早期梅毒男性发生性行为的男性的梅毒伴侣服务评估
背景:自20世纪初以来,伴侣服务(PS)一直是美国梅毒控制的组成部分,但尚未在对照研究中进行评估。方法:我们比较了2020年5月至2021年6月期间被诊断为梅毒的男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)的PS结果,卫生部门工作人员为这些人启动了PS工作(PS组),并随机选择了一个对照组,他们没有启动PS工作。我们对参与者进行了关于伴侣结局的访谈,并使用卡方检验和泊松回归来检验组间结局的差异。结果:我们尝试联系350名GBMSM,并邀请184名男性参与,其中92名(51%)参与,其中PS组41名,对照组51名。报告在诊断后通知bb0.1性伴侣的参与者百分比在PS组和对照组中相似(83%对80%,p = 0.80)。在PS组和对照组之间,通知或测试的伴侣的平均数量没有差异(通知的平均值[范围]:2.5 [0-10]vs 3.3 [0-20], p = 0.16;检验平均值[范围]:1.2 [0-8]vs. 1 [0-10], p = 0.66);多变量结果相似。在那些接触过PS的人中,大约一半(48%)报告PS工作人员帮助他们进行了梅毒的医疗护理,31%的人说PS工作人员将他们与prep联系起来。结论:这项小规模的对照评估表明,梅毒PS可能对GBMSM的伴侣治疗没有影响,尽管大多数男性支持干预。需要一项随机试验来明确定义梅毒PS在GBMSM中的当代有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信