Roxanne P Kerani, Alene Chang, Anna Berzkalns, Juan Palacios Moreno, Meena Ramchandani, Matthew R Golden
{"title":"An evaluation of syphilis partner services among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men with early syphilis in King County, WA.","authors":"Roxanne P Kerani, Alene Chang, Anna Berzkalns, Juan Palacios Moreno, Meena Ramchandani, Matthew R Golden","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partner services (PS) have been integral to syphilis control in the U.S. since the early 20th century but have not been evaluated in a controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared PS outcomes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) diagnosed with syphilis from May 2020-June 2021 for whom health department staff initiated PS efforts (PS group) and a randomly selected control group for whom no PS efforts were initiated. We interviewed participants about partner outcomes and used chi-square tests and Poisson regression to test for differences in outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We attempted to contact 350 GBMSM and offered participation to 184 men, of whom 92 (51%) participated, including 41 men in the PS group and 51 controls. The percentage of participants who reported notifying >1 sex partner after diagnosis was similar in the PS and control groups (83% vs. 80%, p = 0.80). Mean number of partners notified or tested did not differ between PS and control groups (notified mean[range]: 2.5 [0-10] vs 3.3 [0-20], p = 0.16; tested mean[range]: 1.2 [0-8] vs. 1 [0-10], p = 0.66); multivariate results were similar. Among those contacted for PS, approximately half (48%) reported PS staff helped them with medical care for syphilis, and 31% said that PS staff connected them to PrEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This small, controlled evaluation suggests that syphilis PS may have no impact on partner treatment among GBMSM, though most men support the intervention. A randomized trial is needed to definitively define the contemporary effectiveness of syphilis PS among GBMSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Partner services (PS) have been integral to syphilis control in the U.S. since the early 20th century but have not been evaluated in a controlled study.
Methods: We compared PS outcomes among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) diagnosed with syphilis from May 2020-June 2021 for whom health department staff initiated PS efforts (PS group) and a randomly selected control group for whom no PS efforts were initiated. We interviewed participants about partner outcomes and used chi-square tests and Poisson regression to test for differences in outcomes between groups.
Results: We attempted to contact 350 GBMSM and offered participation to 184 men, of whom 92 (51%) participated, including 41 men in the PS group and 51 controls. The percentage of participants who reported notifying >1 sex partner after diagnosis was similar in the PS and control groups (83% vs. 80%, p = 0.80). Mean number of partners notified or tested did not differ between PS and control groups (notified mean[range]: 2.5 [0-10] vs 3.3 [0-20], p = 0.16; tested mean[range]: 1.2 [0-8] vs. 1 [0-10], p = 0.66); multivariate results were similar. Among those contacted for PS, approximately half (48%) reported PS staff helped them with medical care for syphilis, and 31% said that PS staff connected them to PrEP.
Conclusions: This small, controlled evaluation suggests that syphilis PS may have no impact on partner treatment among GBMSM, though most men support the intervention. A randomized trial is needed to definitively define the contemporary effectiveness of syphilis PS among GBMSM.
期刊介绍:
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.