Reading the family: A constructivist grounded theory on organ donation conversations.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312462
Lissette Avilés
{"title":"Reading the family: A constructivist grounded theory on organ donation conversations.","authors":"Lissette Avilés","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approaching families to discuss deceased organ donation authorisation is considered one of the central stages of the organ donation process. In many countries, specialist nurses lead the organ donation process, approach and support families. However, how these encounters occur is not yet fully understood. A constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to conceptualise the process of approaching families from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and families. Data collected included six months of observations across two large hospitals in Chile, documents, interviews and focus groups with 71 participants including healthcare professionals involved in the organ donation process, and bereaved families who were approached for organ donation conversations. The theory Reading the family was developed to explain the relational process of how nurse organ donor coordinators approach families to negotiate organ donation authorization. It explains the sophisticated and skilled process of accessing, assessing and managing family's emotions to negotiate organ donation authorization as a family unit. The theory has two dimensions, indirect and direct, which refers to when and how nurses read families emotions to lead organ donation conversations and support bereaved families' decision-making process. These dimensions critically depend on the clinicians set of beliefs and communication processes. Understanding the complexities of approaching families is essential for practice and policymaking, particularly when there is a trend towards individual decision-making instead of understanding organ donation as a family affair. Reading the family could be eventually applied in other contexts and situations that involve navigating difficult conversations, and therefore, further research is needed and suggested to assess the feasibility of its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0312462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approaching families to discuss deceased organ donation authorisation is considered one of the central stages of the organ donation process. In many countries, specialist nurses lead the organ donation process, approach and support families. However, how these encounters occur is not yet fully understood. A constructivist grounded theory methodology was used to conceptualise the process of approaching families from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and families. Data collected included six months of observations across two large hospitals in Chile, documents, interviews and focus groups with 71 participants including healthcare professionals involved in the organ donation process, and bereaved families who were approached for organ donation conversations. The theory Reading the family was developed to explain the relational process of how nurse organ donor coordinators approach families to negotiate organ donation authorization. It explains the sophisticated and skilled process of accessing, assessing and managing family's emotions to negotiate organ donation authorization as a family unit. The theory has two dimensions, indirect and direct, which refers to when and how nurses read families emotions to lead organ donation conversations and support bereaved families' decision-making process. These dimensions critically depend on the clinicians set of beliefs and communication processes. Understanding the complexities of approaching families is essential for practice and policymaking, particularly when there is a trend towards individual decision-making instead of understanding organ donation as a family affair. Reading the family could be eventually applied in other contexts and situations that involve navigating difficult conversations, and therefore, further research is needed and suggested to assess the feasibility of its application.

阅读家庭:关于器官捐赠对话的建构主义理论。
联系死者家属讨论是否授权捐赠器官被认为是器官捐赠程序的中心阶段之一。在许多国家,专科护士主导器官捐献的程序、途径和支持家属。然而,这些相遇是如何发生的还没有完全了解。建构主义扎根理论方法论被用于概念化从医疗保健专业人员和家庭的角度接近家庭的过程。收集的数据包括在智利两家大医院进行的为期六个月的观察、文件、访谈和71名参与者的焦点小组,其中包括参与器官捐赠过程的医疗保健专业人员,以及接触器官捐赠对话的死者家属。阅读家庭理论的发展是为了解释护士器官捐赠协调员如何与家庭协商器官捐赠授权的关系过程。它解释了作为一个家庭单位,获取、评估和管理家庭情绪以协商器官捐赠授权的复杂而熟练的过程。该理论有两个维度,间接和直接,指的是护士何时以及如何解读家属的情绪,以引导器官捐赠对话,并支持失去亲人的家庭的决策过程。这些方面严重依赖于临床医生的信念和沟通过程。了解接触家属的复杂性对于实践和决策至关重要,特别是当个人决定而不是将器官捐赠理解为家庭事务的趋势出现时。阅读家庭最终可以应用于其他涉及引导困难对话的上下文和情况,因此,需要进一步研究并建议评估其应用的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信