Education level, contraceptive communication, and IUD use among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A qualitative study.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0311022
Danielle Kane, Bing Han, Yu Chung
{"title":"Education level, contraceptive communication, and IUD use among rural-to-urban migrants in China: A qualitative study.","authors":"Danielle Kane, Bing Han, Yu Chung","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0311022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers have high rates of unintended pregnancy, yet many are reluctant to choose the most effective forms of contraception, such as IUDs (intrauterine devices). Those who do are often socioeconomically disadvantaged, a finding that contradicts much health research, namely that higher SES individuals can access better healthcare. This puzzle highlights the need to understand better migrant workers' contraceptive decision-making. This paper reports findings from interviews with 91 migrant workers. Across educational backgrounds, IUD use usually followed contraceptive-related communication. Female interviewees with less education were more likely to have contraception-related discussions, including with doctors, in which the benefits of IUDs emerged. Typically, however, these conversations happened after a pregnancy. The findings suggest a need for public awareness campaigns that destigmatize discussion of contraception and interventions targeted by education level.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0311022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers have high rates of unintended pregnancy, yet many are reluctant to choose the most effective forms of contraception, such as IUDs (intrauterine devices). Those who do are often socioeconomically disadvantaged, a finding that contradicts much health research, namely that higher SES individuals can access better healthcare. This puzzle highlights the need to understand better migrant workers' contraceptive decision-making. This paper reports findings from interviews with 91 migrant workers. Across educational backgrounds, IUD use usually followed contraceptive-related communication. Female interviewees with less education were more likely to have contraception-related discussions, including with doctors, in which the benefits of IUDs emerged. Typically, however, these conversations happened after a pregnancy. The findings suggest a need for public awareness campaigns that destigmatize discussion of contraception and interventions targeted by education level.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中国城乡流动人口教育水平、避孕传播与宫内节育器使用:一项定性研究。
中国的农民工意外怀孕率很高,但许多人不愿意选择最有效的避孕方式,比如宫内节育器。那些拥有社会经济地位的人往往处于社会经济劣势,这一发现与许多健康研究相矛盾,即较高的社会经济地位的人可以获得更好的医疗保健。这一难题凸显了更好地了解农民工避孕决策的必要性。本文报告了对91名农民工的访谈结果。无论教育背景如何,宫内节育器的使用通常是在避孕相关的交流之后进行的。受教育程度较低的女性受访者更有可能进行与避孕有关的讨论,包括与医生的讨论,其中显示了宫内节育器的好处。然而,这些谈话通常发生在怀孕之后。研究结果表明,有必要开展提高公众意识的运动,使讨论避孕和针对教育水平的干预措施不受歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信