Nonfatal Strangulation Injuries: Improving Physician Knowledge and Attitudes.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sarah Pankratz, Margie Clouse, Christine Motzkus
{"title":"Nonfatal Strangulation Injuries: Improving Physician Knowledge and Attitudes.","authors":"Sarah Pankratz, Margie Clouse, Christine Motzkus","doi":"10.1177/08862605241303961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the emergency department, physicians evaluate patients who have experienced nonfatal strangulation resulting from sexual assault or intimate partner violence. Given the prevalence and potential consequences of nonfatal strangulation injuries, physicians need confidence in their decision-making for these patients. Previous educational interventions effectively improved physician knowledge of sexual assault and intimate partner violence patients; however, no studies have been conducted with the goal of improving physician knowledge about nonfatal strangulation injuries in this population. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were administered to physicians from four different south-central Indiana emergency departments. These surveys assessed comfort and knowledge regarding the treatment of survivors of sexual assault, intimate partner violence, and nonfatal strangulation. Additionally, six vignette-style questions designed to evaluate knowledge in clinical scenarios were also administered. A 15-min, interactive, educational presentation was delivered prior to the post-survey. Post-intervention participants tended to rate awareness of imaging recommendations and resources, decision-making, history taking, and use of trauma-informed care higher than pre-intervention participants. The post-intervention group (<i>n</i> = 12) answered more clinical vignette questions correctly with an average of 92% correct compared with the pre-intervention group (<i>n</i> = 22), which had an average of 76% correct. Based on these results a 15-min educational intervention was effective in improving physician knowledge, confidence, and comfort in treating patients who have experienced nonfatal strangulation in small community-based emergency department settings. In the future, similar interventions may be implemented in other emergency departments to increase awareness about the evaluation and treatment of nonfatal strangulation injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605241303961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241303961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the emergency department, physicians evaluate patients who have experienced nonfatal strangulation resulting from sexual assault or intimate partner violence. Given the prevalence and potential consequences of nonfatal strangulation injuries, physicians need confidence in their decision-making for these patients. Previous educational interventions effectively improved physician knowledge of sexual assault and intimate partner violence patients; however, no studies have been conducted with the goal of improving physician knowledge about nonfatal strangulation injuries in this population. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were administered to physicians from four different south-central Indiana emergency departments. These surveys assessed comfort and knowledge regarding the treatment of survivors of sexual assault, intimate partner violence, and nonfatal strangulation. Additionally, six vignette-style questions designed to evaluate knowledge in clinical scenarios were also administered. A 15-min, interactive, educational presentation was delivered prior to the post-survey. Post-intervention participants tended to rate awareness of imaging recommendations and resources, decision-making, history taking, and use of trauma-informed care higher than pre-intervention participants. The post-intervention group (n = 12) answered more clinical vignette questions correctly with an average of 92% correct compared with the pre-intervention group (n = 22), which had an average of 76% correct. Based on these results a 15-min educational intervention was effective in improving physician knowledge, confidence, and comfort in treating patients who have experienced nonfatal strangulation in small community-based emergency department settings. In the future, similar interventions may be implemented in other emergency departments to increase awareness about the evaluation and treatment of nonfatal strangulation injuries.

非致命性绞勒伤:提高医生的知识和态度。
在急诊科,医生评估因性侵犯或亲密伴侣暴力而遭受非致命勒死的病人。鉴于非致命性绞勒伤的普遍性和潜在后果,医生需要对这些患者的决策有信心。以往的教育干预有效提高了医生对性侵犯和亲密伴侣暴力患者的认识;然而,目前还没有研究旨在提高医生对这一人群非致命性窒息伤害的认识。对来自印第安纳州中南部四个不同急诊科的医生进行了干预前后调查。这些调查评估了关于性侵犯、亲密伴侣暴力和非致命勒死幸存者的治疗的舒适度和知识。此外,还设计了六个小插曲式的问题来评估临床场景中的知识。在调查结束前,进行了15分钟的互动式教育演讲。干预后的参与者倾向于评价对影像学建议和资源、决策、历史记录和创伤知情护理的认识,高于干预前的参与者。与干预前组(n = 22)相比,干预后组(n = 12)正确回答了更多的临床小问题,平均正确率为92%,而干预前组(n = 22)的平均正确率为76%。基于这些结果,15分钟的教育干预有效地提高了医生的知识、信心和舒适度,在小型社区急诊科环境中治疗经历过非致命性绞勒的患者。在未来,类似的干预措施可能会在其他急诊科实施,以提高对非致命性绞勒伤的评估和治疗的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信