A Model of Bystander Helping to Prevent Suicide: Examining and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Victoria Banyard, Kimberly J Mitchell, Lisa M Jones, Shira Dunsiger, Michele L Ybarra
{"title":"A Model of Bystander Helping to Prevent Suicide: Examining and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.","authors":"Victoria Banyard, Kimberly J Mitchell, Lisa M Jones, Shira Dunsiger, Michele L Ybarra","doi":"10.1177/08862605241303954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research documents alarmingly high suicidal behavior risk among adolescents and young adults in the United States. A related concern is similarly high rates of exposure to the self-directed violence (SDV) of others. The current study examined how components of the Theory of Planned Behavior explain factors related to helping social network members engaging in SDV. Baseline data (<i>N</i> = 4,982) from the longitudinal study, Project Lift Up, were analyzed cross-sectionally. Young people, ages 13 to 22, were recruited through social media platforms; sexual and gender minority youth were oversampled. Participants answered questions about exposure to other people's SDV and measures of key constructs related to the Theory of Planned Behavior for helping reduce SDV including perceptions of what others think about helping and behavioral control. Three outcomes were assessed: Intent to help someone, proactive behavior to promote the other person's mattering, and proactive behavior to prevent SDV. Measures showed adequate reliability and validity (Cronbach's alphas above .70). Overall, regression analyses across the three outcomes partially supported the Theory of Planned Behavior. Attitudes and confidence explained variance in intent to help and proactive behavior outcomes, whereas intent and social norms showed more mixed associations with the three outcomes. While the Theory of Planned Behavior is useful to explain gatekeeper outcomes for suicide prevention, specific significant factors within the model vary by the specific outcome being examined. Further research to unpack nuances in gatekeeper behaviors is needed and may help design prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605241303954"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241303954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research documents alarmingly high suicidal behavior risk among adolescents and young adults in the United States. A related concern is similarly high rates of exposure to the self-directed violence (SDV) of others. The current study examined how components of the Theory of Planned Behavior explain factors related to helping social network members engaging in SDV. Baseline data (N = 4,982) from the longitudinal study, Project Lift Up, were analyzed cross-sectionally. Young people, ages 13 to 22, were recruited through social media platforms; sexual and gender minority youth were oversampled. Participants answered questions about exposure to other people's SDV and measures of key constructs related to the Theory of Planned Behavior for helping reduce SDV including perceptions of what others think about helping and behavioral control. Three outcomes were assessed: Intent to help someone, proactive behavior to promote the other person's mattering, and proactive behavior to prevent SDV. Measures showed adequate reliability and validity (Cronbach's alphas above .70). Overall, regression analyses across the three outcomes partially supported the Theory of Planned Behavior. Attitudes and confidence explained variance in intent to help and proactive behavior outcomes, whereas intent and social norms showed more mixed associations with the three outcomes. While the Theory of Planned Behavior is useful to explain gatekeeper outcomes for suicide prevention, specific significant factors within the model vary by the specific outcome being examined. Further research to unpack nuances in gatekeeper behaviors is needed and may help design prevention strategies.

旁观者帮助预防自杀的模型:计划行为理论的检验与拓展。
研究表明,美国青少年和年轻人的自杀行为风险高得惊人。另一个相关的担忧是,遭受他人自我导向暴力(SDV)的比例同样很高。目前的研究考察了计划行为理论的组成部分如何解释帮助社会网络成员参与SDV的相关因素。来自纵向研究Project Lift Up的基线数据(N = 4,982)进行了横断面分析。年龄在13到22岁之间的年轻人是通过社交媒体平台招募的;性取向和性别少数派青年被过度抽样。参与者回答了关于暴露于他人的SDV和帮助减少SDV的计划行为理论相关的关键构念的测量问题,包括他人对帮助和行为控制的看法。评估了三个结果:帮助某人的意图,促进他人重要性的主动行为,以及预防SDV的主动行为。测量显示足够的信度和效度(Cronbach's alpha > 0.70)。总体而言,三个结果的回归分析部分支持计划行为理论。态度和信心解释了帮助意图和主动行为结果的差异,而意图和社会规范与这三种结果的关联更为复杂。虽然计划行为理论有助于解释自杀预防的看门人结果,但模型中特定的重要因素因被检查的具体结果而异。需要进一步的研究来揭示看门人行为的细微差别,这可能有助于设计预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信