Covert Critical Illness Encephalopathy: Impairments That Escape Detection by Guideline Recommended, Protocolized Assessments.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006558
Ruhi Shirodkar, Isaac J Bourgeois, Minjee Kim, Eyal Y Kimchi, Eric M Liotta, Matthew B Maas
{"title":"Covert Critical Illness Encephalopathy: Impairments That Escape Detection by Guideline Recommended, Protocolized Assessments.","authors":"Ruhi Shirodkar, Isaac J Bourgeois, Minjee Kim, Eyal Y Kimchi, Eric M Liotta, Matthew B Maas","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether cognitive impairments of important severity escape detection by guideline-recommended delirium and encephalopathy screening instruments in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study with random patient sampling.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICUs of a large referral hospital with protocols implementing the Society of Critical Care Medicine's ICU Liberation Bundle.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients with a heterogeneous mix of primary organ system conditions leading to critical illness and with no abnormal findings scored in Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) screening, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) 0, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15, indicating they were alert, fully oriented, and following commands with no delirium or findings to indicate subsyndromal delirium.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We evaluated 50 patients, age 54 ± 16 years. Trained critical care nurses assessed patients at regular intervals using the CAM-ICU, RASS, and GCS per a protocol. We performed a battery of psychometric cognitive tests using the NIH Toolbox. Executive functions linked to attention and inhibitory control, and processing speed were 1.5 sd below population norm (both p < 0.01). Working memory and cognitive flexibility were also significantly, but less severely, impaired ( p < 0.01 and p = 0.026). Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the patients scored at least 1.5 sd worse than demographically adjusted means in two or more cognitive domains, a commonly used diagnostic criterion for cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substantial cognitive impairment is present among critically ill patients with no abnormalities detected by standard delirium and encephalopathy assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e613-e618"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether cognitive impairments of important severity escape detection by guideline-recommended delirium and encephalopathy screening instruments in critically ill patients.

Design: Cross-sectional study with random patient sampling.

Setting: ICUs of a large referral hospital with protocols implementing the Society of Critical Care Medicine's ICU Liberation Bundle.

Patients: Patients with a heterogeneous mix of primary organ system conditions leading to critical illness and with no abnormal findings scored in Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) screening, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) 0, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15, indicating they were alert, fully oriented, and following commands with no delirium or findings to indicate subsyndromal delirium.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We evaluated 50 patients, age 54 ± 16 years. Trained critical care nurses assessed patients at regular intervals using the CAM-ICU, RASS, and GCS per a protocol. We performed a battery of psychometric cognitive tests using the NIH Toolbox. Executive functions linked to attention and inhibitory control, and processing speed were 1.5 sd below population norm (both p < 0.01). Working memory and cognitive flexibility were also significantly, but less severely, impaired ( p < 0.01 and p = 0.026). Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the patients scored at least 1.5 sd worse than demographically adjusted means in two or more cognitive domains, a commonly used diagnostic criterion for cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: Substantial cognitive impairment is present among critically ill patients with no abnormalities detected by standard delirium and encephalopathy assessments.

隐蔽性危重性脑病:未被指南推荐、协议化评估发现的损伤。
目的:确定危重患者重要严重程度的认知障碍是否能通过指南推荐的谵妄和脑病筛查仪器检测出来。设计:随机患者抽样的横断面研究。环境:一家大型转诊医院的ICU,协议执行重症监护医学学会的ICU解放包。患者:主要器官系统疾病异质性混合导致危重疾病且未出现异常发现的患者,在ICU (CAM-ICU)筛查的混淆评估方法、Richmond激动镇静量表(RASS) 0分和Glasgow昏迷量表(GCS) 15分中得分,表明他们警觉、完全定向、服从命令,无谵妄或亚综合征性谵妄的发现。干预措施:没有。测量方法及主要结果:我们评估了50例患者,年龄54±16岁。训练有素的重症监护护士按协议使用CAM-ICU, RASS和GCS定期评估患者。我们使用NIH工具箱进行了一系列的心理认知测试。与注意和抑制控制相关的执行功能和加工速度比群体正常值低1.5 sd (p < 0.01)。工作记忆和认知灵活性也显著受损,但较轻(p < 0.01和p = 0.026)。近三分之二(64%)的患者在两个或多个认知领域的得分至少比人口统计学调整后的平均值低1.5 sd,这是认知障碍的常用诊断标准。结论:在标准谵妄和脑病评估中未发现异常的危重患者中存在严重的认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信