Xiaojuan Zhang, Liu Yang, Cong Xiao, Jiacong Li, Tao Hu, Linfeng Li
{"title":"Association between waist-to-hip ratio and risk of myocardial infarction: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiaojuan Zhang, Liu Yang, Cong Xiao, Jiacong Li, Tao Hu, Linfeng Li","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial infarction(MI) is one of the most serious health threats. Despite the increasing number of clinical methods used to predict the onset of MI, the prediction of MI is still unsatisfactory and necessitates new methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review observational studies from the past two decades on the association between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and MI risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Original literature on the correlation between WHR and MI was searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, CNKI, and Wanfang up to January 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revman5.3. Meta-analysis with Stata 16.0 calculated the combined Odd ratio (OR) for WHR and MI risk. Heterogeneity was assessed with the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic to select the appropriate effects model. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and funnel plots tested for heterogeneity and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 observational studies were included, involving 709,093 participants. The meta-analysis showed that an elevated WHR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MI, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.98 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.75-2.24] and high heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 91.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between WHR and MI in women (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.43-2.77) compared to men (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.22). Regional analysis indicated that the association between WHR and MI risk was highest in Asian populations (OR: 2.93 95% CI: 1.61-5.33), followed by American (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45-2.08) and European populations (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.49-3.22). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results remained stable after excluding one study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the general adult population, a higher WHR is a potentially significant association for MI and has predictive value for MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1438817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1438817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction(MI) is one of the most serious health threats. Despite the increasing number of clinical methods used to predict the onset of MI, the prediction of MI is still unsatisfactory and necessitates new methods.
Objective: To systematically review observational studies from the past two decades on the association between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and MI risk.
Methods: Original literature on the correlation between WHR and MI was searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, CNKI, and Wanfang up to January 31, 2024. Two researchers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revman5.3. Meta-analysis with Stata 16.0 calculated the combined Odd ratio (OR) for WHR and MI risk. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic to select the appropriate effects model. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and funnel plots tested for heterogeneity and publication bias.
Results: A total of 22 observational studies were included, involving 709,093 participants. The meta-analysis showed that an elevated WHR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MI, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.98 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.75-2.24] and high heterogeneity (I2 = 91.5%, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association between WHR and MI in women (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.43-2.77) compared to men (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.22). Regional analysis indicated that the association between WHR and MI risk was highest in Asian populations (OR: 2.93 95% CI: 1.61-5.33), followed by American (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.45-2.08) and European populations (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.49-3.22). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the results remained stable after excluding one study.
Conclusion: In the general adult population, a higher WHR is a potentially significant association for MI and has predictive value for MI.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers?
At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.