Hyun Jin Lee, Yun-Jung Yang, Sung Goo Yoo, Eun-Ju Jeon
{"title":"Diagnostic Efficacy of the Body Roll Test for Lateral Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Hyun Jin Lee, Yun-Jung Yang, Sung Goo Yoo, Eun-Ju Jeon","doi":"10.21053/ceo.2024.00296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) is diagnosed using the head roll test (HRT), which involves rotating the head to mobilize particles within the lateral canal, inducing nystagmus. The body roll test (BRT) is conducted by rolling both the body and head simultaneously, offering the advantage of safely achieving the correct rotational angle in both directions. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of the BRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled study was conducted. In total, 43 patients with LC-BPPV symptoms were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n=21), the HRT was administered first, followed by the BRT after a 5-minute interval. In contrast, group B (n=22) received the BRT first, followed by the HRT after 5 minutes. Participants wore Fresnel glasses, which allowed for the observation of nystagmus in sitting, bowing, and lying down positions. We recorded the direction, latency, and duration of the nystagmus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of nystagmus types was 18:25 (geotropic: apogeotropic). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or type of nystagmus between the two groups. The findings from the HRT aligned with those from the BRT for 32 (74.4%) of the participants. No statistical differences were noted in the diagnosis of the affected side or in the type of nystagmus (geotropic vs. apogeotropic) between the HRT (n=32) and BRT (n=32) (P>0.05). The diagnostic rates in the first (n=31) and second tests (n=33) were similar, showing no significant difference and consistent results regarding the type of LC-BPPV. Additionally, there were no significant differences in postural discomfort and pain scores between these groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRT and HRT demonstrate comparable diagnostic efficacy for LC-BPPV. BRT offers a viable alternative, especially for patients whose conditions preclude the use of HRT, and may improve diagnostic accuracy when combined with HRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":10318,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"134-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2024.00296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) is diagnosed using the head roll test (HRT), which involves rotating the head to mobilize particles within the lateral canal, inducing nystagmus. The body roll test (BRT) is conducted by rolling both the body and head simultaneously, offering the advantage of safely achieving the correct rotational angle in both directions. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of the BRT.
Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted. In total, 43 patients with LC-BPPV symptoms were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n=21), the HRT was administered first, followed by the BRT after a 5-minute interval. In contrast, group B (n=22) received the BRT first, followed by the HRT after 5 minutes. Participants wore Fresnel glasses, which allowed for the observation of nystagmus in sitting, bowing, and lying down positions. We recorded the direction, latency, and duration of the nystagmus.
Results: The distribution of nystagmus types was 18:25 (geotropic: apogeotropic). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or type of nystagmus between the two groups. The findings from the HRT aligned with those from the BRT for 32 (74.4%) of the participants. No statistical differences were noted in the diagnosis of the affected side or in the type of nystagmus (geotropic vs. apogeotropic) between the HRT (n=32) and BRT (n=32) (P>0.05). The diagnostic rates in the first (n=31) and second tests (n=33) were similar, showing no significant difference and consistent results regarding the type of LC-BPPV. Additionally, there were no significant differences in postural discomfort and pain scores between these groups.
Conclusion: BRT and HRT demonstrate comparable diagnostic efficacy for LC-BPPV. BRT offers a viable alternative, especially for patients whose conditions preclude the use of HRT, and may improve diagnostic accuracy when combined with HRT.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology (Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, CEO) is an international peer-reviewed journal on recent developments in diagnosis and treatment of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery and dedicated to the advancement of patient care in ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders. This journal publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic researches, reviews, and clinical trials, encompassing the whole topics of otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery.
CEO was first issued in 2008 and this journal is published in English four times (the last day of February, May, August, and November) per year by the Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. The Journal aims at publishing evidence-based, scientifically written articles from different disciplines of otorhinolaryngology field.
The readership contains clinical/basic research into current practice in otorhinolaryngology, audiology, speech pathology, head and neck oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The readers are otolaryngologists, head and neck surgeons and oncologists, audiologists, and speech pathologists.