Higher rates of delay in starting advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapies linked to insurance delays, intravenous infusions, and lack of pharmacy support.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sara Gottesman, Karen Xiao, Hang P Nguyen, Elizabeth Hernandez, Emily Saweris, Priyanka Jaganathan, Faraz Jafri, Jonathan Davis, Kimhouy Tong, Zhouwen Tang, Jill K J Gaidos, Linda A Feagins
{"title":"Higher rates of delay in starting advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapies linked to insurance delays, intravenous infusions, and lack of pharmacy support.","authors":"Sara Gottesman, Karen Xiao, Hang P Nguyen, Elizabeth Hernandez, Emily Saweris, Priyanka Jaganathan, Faraz Jafri, Jonathan Davis, Kimhouy Tong, Zhouwen Tang, Jill K J Gaidos, Linda A Feagins","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because biologic and small molecule therapy is expensive, payors have mandated pre-authorizations for these medications, often resulting in a lengthy approval process. The aims of this study are to assess the frequency of and risk factors for delays in starting advanced therapies assessing insurance, care team, and patient-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multi-center study of adult inflammatory bowel disease patients with prescriptions for an advanced therapy in two geographically distinct academic gastroenterology practices; one with and the other without a dedicated pharmacist. A priori we defined a delay in starting therapy as >14 days between prescription and first dose. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for risk factors for delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 388 patients were prescribed advanced therapies with 46.6% receiving their first dose within 14 days. Patients who were on time vs delayed were similar in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and disease activity. After adjusting for confounders, three independent risk factors remained significant as predictors for delay; study site (OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333), intravenous drug delivery as opposed to subcutaneous or oral (OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099), and insurance denial (OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a multicenter study, we found that a delay between prescription and administration of first dose of an advanced therapy is common, with >50% of patients having the first dose delayed by >2 weeks. Delays in starting therapy were significantly more likely if denied by insurance, given via IV induction, or at a study site without a dedicated pharmacist.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because biologic and small molecule therapy is expensive, payors have mandated pre-authorizations for these medications, often resulting in a lengthy approval process. The aims of this study are to assess the frequency of and risk factors for delays in starting advanced therapies assessing insurance, care team, and patient-related factors.

Methods: Retrospective, multi-center study of adult inflammatory bowel disease patients with prescriptions for an advanced therapy in two geographically distinct academic gastroenterology practices; one with and the other without a dedicated pharmacist. A priori we defined a delay in starting therapy as >14 days between prescription and first dose. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for risk factors for delay.

Results: A total of 388 patients were prescribed advanced therapies with 46.6% receiving their first dose within 14 days. Patients who were on time vs delayed were similar in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and disease activity. After adjusting for confounders, three independent risk factors remained significant as predictors for delay; study site (OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333), intravenous drug delivery as opposed to subcutaneous or oral (OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099), and insurance denial (OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825).

Conclusions: In a multicenter study, we found that a delay between prescription and administration of first dose of an advanced therapy is common, with >50% of patients having the first dose delayed by >2 weeks. Delays in starting therapy were significantly more likely if denied by insurance, given via IV induction, or at a study site without a dedicated pharmacist.

延迟开始晚期炎症性肠病治疗的较高比率与保险延迟、静脉输液和缺乏药房支持有关。
背景:由于生物和小分子治疗是昂贵的,付款人要求预先授权这些药物,往往导致一个漫长的审批过程。本研究的目的是评估延迟开始先进治疗的频率和风险因素,评估保险、护理团队和患者相关因素。方法:回顾性,多中心研究成人炎症性肠病患者在两个地理位置不同的胃肠病学学术实践的先进治疗处方;一个有一个没有专职药剂师。先验地,我们将开始治疗的延迟定义为从处方到首次给药之间的140天。采用Logistic回归分析评估延迟的危险因素。结果:共有388例患者接受了先进的治疗,46.6%的患者在14天内接受了第一剂治疗。准时与延迟的患者在基线人口统计学、疾病特征和疾病活动性方面相似。在调整混杂因素后,三个独立的风险因素仍然是延误的重要预测因素;研究地点(OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333),静脉给药相对于皮下或口服(OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099)和拒绝保险(OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825)。结论:在一项多中心研究中,我们发现从处方到首次给药之间的延迟是很常见的,50%的患者首次给药延迟了2周。如果被保险公司拒绝,通过静脉注射,或者在没有专职药剂师的研究地点,延迟开始治疗的可能性要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信