Higher rates of delay in starting advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapies linked to insurance delays, intravenous infusions, and lack of pharmacy support.
Sara Gottesman, Karen Xiao, Hang P Nguyen, Elizabeth Hernandez, Emily Saweris, Priyanka Jaganathan, Faraz Jafri, Jonathan Davis, Kimhouy Tong, Zhouwen Tang, Jill K J Gaidos, Linda A Feagins
{"title":"Higher rates of delay in starting advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapies linked to insurance delays, intravenous infusions, and lack of pharmacy support.","authors":"Sara Gottesman, Karen Xiao, Hang P Nguyen, Elizabeth Hernandez, Emily Saweris, Priyanka Jaganathan, Faraz Jafri, Jonathan Davis, Kimhouy Tong, Zhouwen Tang, Jill K J Gaidos, Linda A Feagins","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Because biologic and small molecule therapy is expensive, payors have mandated pre-authorizations for these medications, often resulting in a lengthy approval process. The aims of this study are to assess the frequency of and risk factors for delays in starting advanced therapies assessing insurance, care team, and patient-related factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multi-center study of adult inflammatory bowel disease patients with prescriptions for an advanced therapy in two geographically distinct academic gastroenterology practices; one with and the other without a dedicated pharmacist. A priori we defined a delay in starting therapy as >14 days between prescription and first dose. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for risk factors for delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 388 patients were prescribed advanced therapies with 46.6% receiving their first dose within 14 days. Patients who were on time vs delayed were similar in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and disease activity. After adjusting for confounders, three independent risk factors remained significant as predictors for delay; study site (OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333), intravenous drug delivery as opposed to subcutaneous or oral (OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099), and insurance denial (OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a multicenter study, we found that a delay between prescription and administration of first dose of an advanced therapy is common, with >50% of patients having the first dose delayed by >2 weeks. Delays in starting therapy were significantly more likely if denied by insurance, given via IV induction, or at a study site without a dedicated pharmacist.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Because biologic and small molecule therapy is expensive, payors have mandated pre-authorizations for these medications, often resulting in a lengthy approval process. The aims of this study are to assess the frequency of and risk factors for delays in starting advanced therapies assessing insurance, care team, and patient-related factors.
Methods: Retrospective, multi-center study of adult inflammatory bowel disease patients with prescriptions for an advanced therapy in two geographically distinct academic gastroenterology practices; one with and the other without a dedicated pharmacist. A priori we defined a delay in starting therapy as >14 days between prescription and first dose. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for risk factors for delay.
Results: A total of 388 patients were prescribed advanced therapies with 46.6% receiving their first dose within 14 days. Patients who were on time vs delayed were similar in baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and disease activity. After adjusting for confounders, three independent risk factors remained significant as predictors for delay; study site (OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333), intravenous drug delivery as opposed to subcutaneous or oral (OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099), and insurance denial (OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825).
Conclusions: In a multicenter study, we found that a delay between prescription and administration of first dose of an advanced therapy is common, with >50% of patients having the first dose delayed by >2 weeks. Delays in starting therapy were significantly more likely if denied by insurance, given via IV induction, or at a study site without a dedicated pharmacist.
背景:由于生物和小分子治疗是昂贵的,付款人要求预先授权这些药物,往往导致一个漫长的审批过程。本研究的目的是评估延迟开始先进治疗的频率和风险因素,评估保险、护理团队和患者相关因素。方法:回顾性,多中心研究成人炎症性肠病患者在两个地理位置不同的胃肠病学学术实践的先进治疗处方;一个有一个没有专职药剂师。先验地,我们将开始治疗的延迟定义为从处方到首次给药之间的140天。采用Logistic回归分析评估延迟的危险因素。结果:共有388例患者接受了先进的治疗,46.6%的患者在14天内接受了第一剂治疗。准时与延迟的患者在基线人口统计学、疾病特征和疾病活动性方面相似。在调整混杂因素后,三个独立的风险因素仍然是延误的重要预测因素;研究地点(OR=5.2, 95% CI 2.894, 9.333),静脉给药相对于皮下或口服(OR=3.07, 95% CI 1.845, 5.099)和拒绝保险(OR=2.72, 95% CI 1.082, 6.825)。结论:在一项多中心研究中,我们发现从处方到首次给药之间的延迟是很常见的,50%的患者首次给药延迟了2周。如果被保险公司拒绝,通过静脉注射,或者在没有专职药剂师的研究地点,延迟开始治疗的可能性要大得多。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease.
Colon and small bowel
Endoscopy and novel diagnostics
Esophagus
Functional GI disorders
Immunology of the GI tract
Microbiology of the GI tract
Inflammatory bowel disease
Pancreas and biliary tract
Liver
Pathology
Pediatrics
Preventative medicine
Nutrition/obesity
Stomach.