Meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA): a new method for enhanced precision in fMRI connectivity analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Franco Cauda, Jordi Manuello, Annachiara Crocetta, Sergio Duca, Tommaso Costa, Donato Liloia
{"title":"Meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA): a new method for enhanced precision in fMRI connectivity analysis.","authors":"Franco Cauda, Jordi Manuello, Annachiara Crocetta, Sergio Duca, Tommaso Costa, Donato Liloia","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02867-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Co-activation of distinct brain areas provides a valuable measure of functional interaction, or connectivity, between them. One well-validated way to investigate the co-activation patterns of a precise area is meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM), which performs a seed-based meta-analysis on task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (task-fMRI) data. While MACM stands as a powerful automated tool for constructing robust models of whole-brain human functional connectivity, its inherent limitation lies in its inability to capture the distinct interrelationships among multiple brain regions. Consequently, the connectivity patterns highlighted through MACM capture the direct relationship of the seed region with third brain regions, but also a (less informative) residual relationship between the third regions themselves. As a consequence of this, this technique does not allow to evaluate to what extent the observed connectivity pattern is really associated with the fact that the seed region is activated, or it just reflects spurious co-activations unrelated with it. In order to overcome this methodological gap, we introduce a meta-analytic Bayesian-based method, called meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA), that allows to identify the unique contribution of a seed region in shaping whole-brain connectivity. We validate our method by analyzing one of the most complex and dynamic structures of the human brain, the amygdala, indicating that MACPA may be especially useful for delineating region-wise co-activation networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":"230 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02867-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-activation of distinct brain areas provides a valuable measure of functional interaction, or connectivity, between them. One well-validated way to investigate the co-activation patterns of a precise area is meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM), which performs a seed-based meta-analysis on task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (task-fMRI) data. While MACM stands as a powerful automated tool for constructing robust models of whole-brain human functional connectivity, its inherent limitation lies in its inability to capture the distinct interrelationships among multiple brain regions. Consequently, the connectivity patterns highlighted through MACM capture the direct relationship of the seed region with third brain regions, but also a (less informative) residual relationship between the third regions themselves. As a consequence of this, this technique does not allow to evaluate to what extent the observed connectivity pattern is really associated with the fact that the seed region is activated, or it just reflects spurious co-activations unrelated with it. In order to overcome this methodological gap, we introduce a meta-analytic Bayesian-based method, called meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA), that allows to identify the unique contribution of a seed region in shaping whole-brain connectivity. We validate our method by analyzing one of the most complex and dynamic structures of the human brain, the amygdala, indicating that MACPA may be especially useful for delineating region-wise co-activation networks.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信