Benefit of the Omental Flap in Breast Reconstruction for Oncoplastic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1007/s00266-024-04638-2

Liehao Yang, Chen Tao, Yan Yan, Lingfeng Pan, Caihong Li, Xiaoyu Jin, Jiao Kong, Zhuoxia Wu

{"title":"Benefit of the Omental Flap in Breast Reconstruction for Oncoplastic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Liehao Yang, Chen Tao, Yan Yan, Lingfeng Pan, Caihong Li, Xiaoyu Jin, Jiao Kong, Zhuoxia Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04638-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer patients poses the challenge of achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes without increasing the risk of complications. Omental flap has emerged as n reconstructive option in breast surgery, yet the efficacy and safety of large omental flaps remain uncertain. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cosmetic outcomes of large omental flap breast reconstruction, providing updated evidence for clinical practice.Methods: We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases until August 2023. Studies were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each study was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.2.0.Results: A total of 22 studies with 1031 patients were reviewed and analyzed. Meta-analysis results showed that hematoma and seroma rate were 4.1% (95%CI 0.8-8.8, P < 0.01). The pooled cosmetic outcomes demonstrated excellent rate 56.7% (95%CI 46.4-69.3, P < 0.01), good rate 7.9% (95%CI 3.9-11.9, P < 0.01), fair rate 28.7% (95%CI 19.9-37.5, P < 0.01). The pooled blood loss was 110.74 ml (95%CI: 72.33-149.14, P = 0), hospital stays was 7.27 (95%CI 5.65-8.89, P < 0.01), the time of omental flap harvest was 65.63 min (95%CI 59.95-71.32, P < 0.01), the time for surgery was 240.87 min (95%CI 5.65- 8.89, P = 0).Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that the omental flap in breast reconstruction is safe and effective with good cosmetic outcomes and a low incidence of complications. The study highlights the benefits of comprehensive assessment, warranting further investigation through high-quality studies and long-term follow-up.Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04638-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer patients poses the challenge of achieving optimal aesthetic outcomes without increasing the risk of complications. Omental flap has emerged as n reconstructive option in breast surgery, yet the efficacy and safety of large omental flaps remain uncertain. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and cosmetic outcomes of large omental flap breast reconstruction, providing updated evidence for clinical practice.

Methods: We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases until August 2023. Studies were screened using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of each study was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using R version 4.2.0.

Results: A total of 22 studies with 1031 patients were reviewed and analyzed. Meta-analysis results showed that hematoma and seroma rate were 4.1% (95%CI 0.8-8.8, P < 0.01). The pooled cosmetic outcomes demonstrated excellent rate 56.7% (95%CI 46.4-69.3, P < 0.01), good rate 7.9% (95%CI 3.9-11.9, P < 0.01), fair rate 28.7% (95%CI 19.9-37.5, P < 0.01). The pooled blood loss was 110.74 ml (95%CI: 72.33-149.14, P = 0), hospital stays was 7.27 (95%CI 5.65-8.89, P < 0.01), the time of omental flap harvest was 65.63 min (95%CI 59.95-71.32, P < 0.01), the time for surgery was 240.87 min (95%CI 5.65- 8.89, P = 0).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that the omental flap in breast reconstruction is safe and effective with good cosmetic outcomes and a low incidence of complications. The study highlights the benefits of comprehensive assessment, warranting further investigation through high-quality studies and long-term follow-up.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

25.00%

发文量

479

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.