{"title":"The effects of cannabinoid agonism on auditory discrimination.","authors":"Danielle Nykanen, Hannah Stiffler, Merrick Bay, Cameron Goldie, Shinnyi Chou, Natashia Swalve","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that cannabis can impair simple auditory processes, and these alterations might be due to cannabinoid agonism. The effect of cannabinoid agonism on relatively complex processes such as auditory discrimination is unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of WIN 55,212-2, a CB1 receptor and CB2 receptor agonism, on auditory discrimination using a go/no-go task. Twenty-two male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were initially trained to lever-press for sucrose to either a pure tone or white noise cue in a go/no-go paradigm, where rats were reinforced for lever-pressing during one cue and punished for lever-pressing during the other auditory cue. After criterion performance was met, rats were then injected with WIN 55,212-2 at 1.2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or a corresponding vehicle (saline) and were tested on auditory discrimination. On day 3, active lever-pressing was higher in both the low- and high-dose WIN groups compared with the saline group. Overall lever-pressing decreased over time in the high-dose WIN 55,212-2 group. There were no effects of the drug on discrimination or errors, suggesting that cannabinoid agonism did not negatively affect auditory discrimination. This is the first study to examine the impact of cannabinoids on the discrimination of tones, finding that, contrary to previous research, the low and high doses of WIN 55,212-2 did not adversely impact auditory-linked behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that cannabis can impair simple auditory processes, and these alterations might be due to cannabinoid agonism. The effect of cannabinoid agonism on relatively complex processes such as auditory discrimination is unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of WIN 55,212-2, a CB1 receptor and CB2 receptor agonism, on auditory discrimination using a go/no-go task. Twenty-two male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were initially trained to lever-press for sucrose to either a pure tone or white noise cue in a go/no-go paradigm, where rats were reinforced for lever-pressing during one cue and punished for lever-pressing during the other auditory cue. After criterion performance was met, rats were then injected with WIN 55,212-2 at 1.2 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or a corresponding vehicle (saline) and were tested on auditory discrimination. On day 3, active lever-pressing was higher in both the low- and high-dose WIN groups compared with the saline group. Overall lever-pressing decreased over time in the high-dose WIN 55,212-2 group. There were no effects of the drug on discrimination or errors, suggesting that cannabinoid agonism did not negatively affect auditory discrimination. This is the first study to examine the impact of cannabinoids on the discrimination of tones, finding that, contrary to previous research, the low and high doses of WIN 55,212-2 did not adversely impact auditory-linked behaviors.
期刊介绍：
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
