Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a systematic transaction model-guided dyadic coping nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer and their spousal caregivers: A pilot study
Yuan Wang , Jiajia Zhang , Shan Wang , Yibo Wu , Ling Hang , Yuming Hua , Weifeng Shi
{"title":"Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a systematic transaction model-guided dyadic coping nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer and their spousal caregivers: A pilot study","authors":"Yuan Wang , Jiajia Zhang , Shan Wang , Yibo Wu , Ling Hang , Yuming Hua , Weifeng Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a Systematic Transaction Model (STM)-guided dyadic coping nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer and their spouses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-arm, pre-test/post-test pilot study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Wuxi, China, recruiting 28 breast cancer patient–caregiver pairs. Each dyad participated in six hybrid intervention sessions. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate pre- and post-intervention changes, and effect sizes were calculated. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, acceptability via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8), and preliminary efficacy through measures of body image, dyadic coping, post-traumatic growth, and marital satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 28 dyads completed the intervention. Patients showed small-to-moderate improvements in body image, post-traumatic growth, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction (<em>d</em> = 0.4–0.5, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.022), with clinically meaningful changes observed in 39%–68% of patients. Spousal caregivers also demonstrated improvements in post-traumatic growth, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction (<em>d</em> = 0.3–0.6, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.033), with 36%–46% showing clinically important differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study supports the feasibility and initial efficacy of an STM-guided dyadic coping intervention, which may benefit breast cancer patients and their spouses as a unit. Further large-scale trials are recommended to validate these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400083416).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524002439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a Systematic Transaction Model (STM)-guided dyadic coping nursing intervention for patients with breast cancer and their spouses.
Methods
A single-arm, pre-test/post-test pilot study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Wuxi, China, recruiting 28 breast cancer patient–caregiver pairs. Each dyad participated in six hybrid intervention sessions. Paired t-tests were used to evaluate pre- and post-intervention changes, and effect sizes were calculated. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates, acceptability via the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8), and preliminary efficacy through measures of body image, dyadic coping, post-traumatic growth, and marital satisfaction.
Results
All 28 dyads completed the intervention. Patients showed small-to-moderate improvements in body image, post-traumatic growth, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction (d = 0.4–0.5, P ≤ 0.022), with clinically meaningful changes observed in 39%–68% of patients. Spousal caregivers also demonstrated improvements in post-traumatic growth, dyadic coping, and marital satisfaction (d = 0.3–0.6, P ≤ 0.033), with 36%–46% showing clinically important differences.
Conclusions
This pilot study supports the feasibility and initial efficacy of an STM-guided dyadic coping intervention, which may benefit breast cancer patients and their spouses as a unit. Further large-scale trials are recommended to validate these findings.