Means Restriction for Suicide Prevention: An Umbrella Review.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Adriana G Nevarez-Flores, Vandana Pandey, Adriana Perez Angelucci, Amanda L Neil, Brett McDermott, David Castle
{"title":"Means Restriction for Suicide Prevention: An Umbrella Review.","authors":"Adriana G Nevarez-Flores, Vandana Pandey, Adriana Perez Angelucci, Amanda L Neil, Brett McDermott, David Castle","doi":"10.1111/acps.13783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this umbrella review is to summarise existing international evidence on means restriction activities for the prevention of suicide, and provide evidence of their success or lack thereof. The consolidated and integrated information can help inform potential public health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An overview of published systematic reviews in English was undertaken. There were no time restrictions. Six major repositories of systematic reviews databases were searched for relevant studies and the reference lists of all selected systematic reviews searched for identifying reviews not retrieved within the database searches. Included studies needed to be Cochrane or non-Cochrane systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that explored means restriction activities for suicide prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 670 records were identified across the searches; 11 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Three further reviews were identified through list searches with one eligible for inclusion. Thus, 12 systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review. Activities undertaken around the world were implemented for the prevention of suicide by firearms, jumping from heights and in front of a moving object, and suicide by hazardous agents. A variety of factors associated with the success and/or failure of mean restriction activities were identified, including the prevalence of method and presence or lack of a substitution effect. Most reviews found means restriction activities successful in the prevention of suicide.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Means restriction is an empirically proven strategy that should be considered for the prevention of suicide. Priority should be given to the most prevalent methods of suicide and implementation of locally relevant solutions, including the cultural context of the targeted population. Other important factors such as minimisation of any substitution effect need to be considered when implementing means restriction activities for suicide prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this umbrella review is to summarise existing international evidence on means restriction activities for the prevention of suicide, and provide evidence of their success or lack thereof. The consolidated and integrated information can help inform potential public health interventions.

Methods: An overview of published systematic reviews in English was undertaken. There were no time restrictions. Six major repositories of systematic reviews databases were searched for relevant studies and the reference lists of all selected systematic reviews searched for identifying reviews not retrieved within the database searches. Included studies needed to be Cochrane or non-Cochrane systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) that explored means restriction activities for suicide prevention.

Results: A total of 670 records were identified across the searches; 11 reviews were eligible for inclusion. Three further reviews were identified through list searches with one eligible for inclusion. Thus, 12 systematic reviews were included in this umbrella review. Activities undertaken around the world were implemented for the prevention of suicide by firearms, jumping from heights and in front of a moving object, and suicide by hazardous agents. A variety of factors associated with the success and/or failure of mean restriction activities were identified, including the prevalence of method and presence or lack of a substitution effect. Most reviews found means restriction activities successful in the prevention of suicide.

Conclusions: Means restriction is an empirically proven strategy that should be considered for the prevention of suicide. Priority should be given to the most prevalent methods of suicide and implementation of locally relevant solutions, including the cultural context of the targeted population. Other important factors such as minimisation of any substitution effect need to be considered when implementing means restriction activities for suicide prevention.

自杀预防的手段限制:概括性回顾。
目的:这个总括性审查的目的是总结现有的国际证据手段限制活动预防自杀,并提供证据的成功或缺乏。这些综合信息有助于为潜在的公共卫生干预措施提供信息。方法:对已发表的英文系统综述进行综述。没有时间限制。检索了6个主要的系统综述数据库的相关研究,并检索了所有选定的系统综述的参考文献列表,以确定在数据库检索中未检索到的综述。纳入的研究需要是Cochrane或非Cochrane系统综述(有或没有荟萃分析),这些综述探讨了预防自杀的手段限制活动。结果:在搜索过程中共识别出670条记录;11篇综述符合纳入条件。通过列表搜索确定了另外三个评论,其中一个符合纳入条件。因此,本综述纳入了12个系统综述。在世界各地开展了各种活动,以防止火器自杀、从高处和在移动物体前跳楼自杀以及危险剂自杀。确定了与平均限制活动的成功和/或失败相关的各种因素,包括方法的流行程度和替代效应的存在或缺乏。大多数审查发现,手段限制活动在预防自杀方面是成功的。结论:手段限制是一种经验证明的策略,应该考虑预防自杀。应优先考虑最普遍的自杀方法和实施与当地有关的解决办法,包括目标人口的文化背景。在实施防止自杀的手段限制活动时,需要考虑其他重要因素,例如尽量减少任何替代效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信