Andrew M Wibowo-Teale, Bang C Huynh, Trygve Helgaker, David J Tozer
{"title":"Classical Reaction Barriers in DFT: An Adiabatic-Connection Perspective.","authors":"Andrew M Wibowo-Teale, Bang C Huynh, Trygve Helgaker, David J Tozer","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classical reaction barriers in density-functional theory are considered from the perspective of the density-fixed adiabatic connection. A 'reaction adiabatic-connection integrand', <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math>, is introduced, where λ is the electron-electron interaction strength, for which <math><msubsup><mo>∫</mo><mn>0</mn><mn>1</mn></msubsup><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub><mi>d</mi><mi>λ</mi></math> equals the barrier, meaning the barrier can be easily visualized as the area under a plot of <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math> vs λ. For five chemical reactions, plots of reference <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math>, calculated from Lieb maximizations at the coupled-cluster level of theory, are compared with approximate <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math>, calculated from common exchange-correlation functionals using coordinate scaling, for coupled-cluster densities. The comparison provides a simple way to visualize and understand functional-driven errors and trends in barriers from approximate functionals, while allowing a clean separation of the role of exchange and correlation contributions to the barrier. Specifically, the accuracy of <math><msub><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math> is determined entirely by the accuracy of the exchange functional, while the shape of <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math> is determined entirely by the correlation functional. The results clearly illustrate why the optimal amount of exact (orbital) exchange in hybrid functionals differs between reactions, including forward and reverse directions in the same reaction, and hence why simply introducing larger amounts of exact exchange may not be a reliable approach for improving barriers. Instead, the shape of <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math> must be captured more accurately through more accurate correlation functionals, and the numerical data presented may be useful for this purpose. Density-driven errors are then considered, and possible cancellation with functional-driven errors in barriers─noted in prior studies when Hartree-Fock densities are used─is illustrated from the perspective of <math><msub><mi>R</mi><mi>λ</mi></msub></math>.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":" ","pages":"124-137"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Classical reaction barriers in density-functional theory are considered from the perspective of the density-fixed adiabatic connection. A 'reaction adiabatic-connection integrand', , is introduced, where λ is the electron-electron interaction strength, for which equals the barrier, meaning the barrier can be easily visualized as the area under a plot of vs λ. For five chemical reactions, plots of reference , calculated from Lieb maximizations at the coupled-cluster level of theory, are compared with approximate , calculated from common exchange-correlation functionals using coordinate scaling, for coupled-cluster densities. The comparison provides a simple way to visualize and understand functional-driven errors and trends in barriers from approximate functionals, while allowing a clean separation of the role of exchange and correlation contributions to the barrier. Specifically, the accuracy of is determined entirely by the accuracy of the exchange functional, while the shape of is determined entirely by the correlation functional. The results clearly illustrate why the optimal amount of exact (orbital) exchange in hybrid functionals differs between reactions, including forward and reverse directions in the same reaction, and hence why simply introducing larger amounts of exact exchange may not be a reliable approach for improving barriers. Instead, the shape of must be captured more accurately through more accurate correlation functionals, and the numerical data presented may be useful for this purpose. Density-driven errors are then considered, and possible cancellation with functional-driven errors in barriers─noted in prior studies when Hartree-Fock densities are used─is illustrated from the perspective of .
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.