Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society
Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Aman Goyal, Samantha Redden-Chirinos, Halil Bulut, Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta, Pujita Munnangi, Jason Shenoi, Paulamy Ganguly, Pierre Blanc, Khalid Alkadam, Sjaak Pouwels, Safwan Taha, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Wah Yang, Andrea Garcia, Kathia Dayana Morfin-Meza, Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco, Alejandro González-Ojeda, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Luigi Marano, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J. Oviedo
{"title":"Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society","authors":"Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Aman Goyal, Samantha Redden-Chirinos, Halil Bulut, Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta, Pujita Munnangi, Jason Shenoi, Paulamy Ganguly, Pierre Blanc, Khalid Alkadam, Sjaak Pouwels, Safwan Taha, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Wah Yang, Andrea Garcia, Kathia Dayana Morfin-Meza, Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco, Alejandro González-Ojeda, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Luigi Marano, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J. Oviedo","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.
Results
Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.
Conclusion
Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较机器人腹股沟疝修补术(RIHR)在70岁以下和70岁以上患者中的效果,由一名在同一机构接受过奖学金培训的机器人外科医生进行。方法回顾性分析2020年至2022年接受机器人原发性经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的患者。患者分为两个年龄组:70岁以下和70岁及以上。通过图表回顾收集数据,平均随访30天。同时,对相关高水平文献进行了系统综述。结果37例患者中,男性28例,占75.7%,平均年龄64.8岁。人口统计学特征在不同年龄组间没有显著差异。70岁患者报告的并发症发生率更高(52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461)。两组间手术时间和住院时间均无差异。在SR中,只有23.7% (n = 9)的研究得出了与年龄相关的结论。三项研究确定年龄超过70岁是术后并发症的危险因素,而两项研究表明RIHR在80岁及以上患者中是可行和安全的。结论70岁以上患者并发症发生率高于年轻患者。然而,目前的文献表明,机器人入路可以为年轻人和老年人的腹股沟疝修复提供一种安全、微创的选择。
期刊介绍:
Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.