Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Aman Goyal, Samantha Redden-Chirinos, Halil Bulut, Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta, Pujita Munnangi, Jason Shenoi, Paulamy Ganguly, Pierre Blanc, Khalid Alkadam, Sjaak Pouwels, Safwan Taha, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Wah Yang, Andrea Garcia, Kathia Dayana Morfin-Meza, Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco, Alejandro González-Ojeda, Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón, Luigi Marano, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J. Oviedo
{"title":"Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society","authors":"Yeisson Rivero-Moreno,&nbsp;Aman Goyal,&nbsp;Samantha Redden-Chirinos,&nbsp;Halil Bulut,&nbsp;Rebeca Dominguez-Profeta,&nbsp;Pujita Munnangi,&nbsp;Jason Shenoi,&nbsp;Paulamy Ganguly,&nbsp;Pierre Blanc,&nbsp;Khalid Alkadam,&nbsp;Sjaak Pouwels,&nbsp;Safwan Taha,&nbsp;Beniamino Pascotto,&nbsp;Juan Santiago Azagra,&nbsp;Wah Yang,&nbsp;Andrea Garcia,&nbsp;Kathia Dayana Morfin-Meza,&nbsp;Clotilde Fuentes-Orozco,&nbsp;Alejandro González-Ojeda,&nbsp;Luis Osvaldo Suárez-Carreón,&nbsp;Luigi Marano,&nbsp;Adel Abou-Mrad,&nbsp;Rodolfo J. Oviedo","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients &gt; 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p &lt; 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.

Results

Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.

Conclusion

Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.

机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术在70岁以下和70岁以上患者中的临床效果:代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)进行的一项单机构回顾性队列研究,并进行了全面的系统评价
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较机器人腹股沟疝修补术(RIHR)在70岁以下和70岁以上患者中的效果,由一名在同一机构接受过奖学金培训的机器人外科医生进行。方法回顾性分析2020年至2022年接受机器人原发性经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的患者。患者分为两个年龄组:70岁以下和70岁及以上。通过图表回顾收集数据,平均随访30天。同时,对相关高水平文献进行了系统综述。结果37例患者中,男性28例,占75.7%,平均年龄64.8岁。人口统计学特征在不同年龄组间没有显著差异。70岁患者报告的并发症发生率更高(52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461)。两组间手术时间和住院时间均无差异。在SR中,只有23.7% (n = 9)的研究得出了与年龄相关的结论。三项研究确定年龄超过70岁是术后并发症的危险因素,而两项研究表明RIHR在80岁及以上患者中是可行和安全的。结论70岁以上患者并发症发生率高于年轻患者。然而,目前的文献表明,机器人入路可以为年轻人和老年人的腹股沟疝修复提供一种安全、微创的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信