Does Proprioceptive Impairment Affect Feedforward Motor Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on Patients With Brain Damage

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nicola Valè;Anna Righetti;Enrico Martini;Michele Boldo;Nicola Bombieri;Nicola Smania
{"title":"Does Proprioceptive Impairment Affect Feedforward Motor Control? A Cross-Sectional Study on Patients With Brain Damage","authors":"Nicola Valè;Anna Righetti;Enrico Martini;Michele Boldo;Nicola Bombieri;Nicola Smania","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3518416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia share common manifestations including dysmetria, intentional tremor and lack of smoothness. We formulated a theoretical framework to describe the patients’ sensory and cerebellar ataxic behavior as consequences of a forward model impairment. To test this framework, the present study aimed to compare upper limb movement kinematics in an index-to-nose task between three groups: healthy controls, people with CNS focal lesions and cerebellar deficits and people with CNS focal lesions and somatosensory impairment. We recruited 12 healthy controls (age \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$= 29.0\\pm 2.9$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n years, female = 5) and 20 participants with focal CNS lesions. We divided the sample according to the lesion site in participants with lesions in areas involved in the somatosensory information processing (n = 12, age \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$= 62.4\\pm 13.6$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n years, female = 5) and participants with lesions in the cerebellum or cerebellar peduncle (n = 8, age \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$= 64.3\\pm 13.9$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n years, female = 1). Movement features concerning movement efficiency (average velocity, peak velocity), accuracy (spatial error when pointing to the nose) and motor planning (timing and spatial occurrence of velocity peak, velocity and deviation from ideal trajectory at 150ms after the movement onset) were computed. Both the groups of participants with CNS lesions performed the movement slower than healthy controls. When comparing results from the two groups of patients, we showed that participants with cerebellar lesions were characterized by greater trial-to-trial variability of the velocity peak (repeated measure ANOVA group effect: F = 5.242, p = 0.012) and its timing (condition*group interaction: F = 5.38, p = 0.011). Our findings suggested that both participants with cerebellar and somatosensory deficits showed signs of anticipatory motor control impairment.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"33 ","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10802931","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10802931/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sensory ataxia and cerebellar ataxia share common manifestations including dysmetria, intentional tremor and lack of smoothness. We formulated a theoretical framework to describe the patients’ sensory and cerebellar ataxic behavior as consequences of a forward model impairment. To test this framework, the present study aimed to compare upper limb movement kinematics in an index-to-nose task between three groups: healthy controls, people with CNS focal lesions and cerebellar deficits and people with CNS focal lesions and somatosensory impairment. We recruited 12 healthy controls (age $= 29.0\pm 2.9$ years, female = 5) and 20 participants with focal CNS lesions. We divided the sample according to the lesion site in participants with lesions in areas involved in the somatosensory information processing (n = 12, age $= 62.4\pm 13.6$ years, female = 5) and participants with lesions in the cerebellum or cerebellar peduncle (n = 8, age $= 64.3\pm 13.9$ years, female = 1). Movement features concerning movement efficiency (average velocity, peak velocity), accuracy (spatial error when pointing to the nose) and motor planning (timing and spatial occurrence of velocity peak, velocity and deviation from ideal trajectory at 150ms after the movement onset) were computed. Both the groups of participants with CNS lesions performed the movement slower than healthy controls. When comparing results from the two groups of patients, we showed that participants with cerebellar lesions were characterized by greater trial-to-trial variability of the velocity peak (repeated measure ANOVA group effect: F = 5.242, p = 0.012) and its timing (condition*group interaction: F = 5.38, p = 0.011). Our findings suggested that both participants with cerebellar and somatosensory deficits showed signs of anticipatory motor control impairment.
本体感觉损伤是否影响前馈运动控制?脑损伤患者的横断面研究
感觉性共济失调和小脑性共济失调有共同的表现,包括韵律障碍、故意震颤和缺乏平滑性。我们制定了一个理论框架来描述患者的感觉和小脑共济失调行为作为向前模型损伤的后果。为了验证这一框架,本研究旨在比较三组:健康对照组、中枢神经系统局灶性病变和小脑缺陷患者和中枢神经系统局灶性病变和躯体感觉障碍患者上肢运动运动学。我们招募了12名健康对照(年龄= 29.0\pm 2.9美元,女性= 5岁)和20名局灶性中枢神经系统病变的参与者。我们根据损伤部位将样本分为在体感觉信息处理区域有损伤的参与者(n = 12,年龄= 62.4\pm 13.6$年,女性= 5)和在小脑或小脑脚有损伤的参与者(n = 8,年龄= 64.3\pm 13.9$年,女性= 1)。运动特征涉及运动效率(平均速度,峰值速度),计算精度(指向机头时的空间误差)和运动规划(运动开始后150ms速度峰值出现的时间和空间、速度和与理想轨迹的偏差)。两组有中枢神经系统损伤的参与者的运动速度都比健康对照组慢。在比较两组患者的结果时,我们发现患有小脑病变的参与者在试验间速度峰值(重复测量方差分析组效应:F = 5.242, p = 0.012)及其时间(条件*组相互作用:F = 5.38, p = 0.011)的变异性更大。我们的研究结果表明,患有小脑和躯体感觉缺陷的参与者都表现出预期运动控制障碍的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信