Randomized Trial of Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Flow in Cyanotic and Acyanotic Congenital Heart Surgery.

Krishna Patel, Tracie K Lin, Joseph B Clark, Gary D Ceneviva, Jason R Imundo, Debra Spear, Allen R Kunselman, Neal J Thomas, John L Myers, Akif Ündar
{"title":"Randomized Trial of Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Flow in Cyanotic and Acyanotic Congenital Heart Surgery.","authors":"Krishna Patel, Tracie K Lin, Joseph B Clark, Gary D Ceneviva, Jason R Imundo, Debra Spear, Allen R Kunselman, Neal J Thomas, John L Myers, Akif Ündar","doi":"10.1177/21501351241288835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study objective was to determine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion modalities on cerebral hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in congenital cardiac surgery patients stratified by acyanotic versus cyanotic heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 159 pediatric (age <18 years) cardiac surgery patients were prospectively randomized to pulsatile or nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and stratified by type of congenital heart disease: acyanotic versus cyanotic. Intraoperative cerebral gaseous microemboli counts and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index were assessed. Organ injury was quantified by Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Additional outcomes included Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score, vasoactive-inotropic score, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, and 180-day mortality. Heterogenous variance linear models (ie, ANOVA and mixed models) and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare groups for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within congenital heart disease subgroups, patients randomized to nonpulsatile versus pulsatile bypass had similar preoperative and operative characteristics. While the intraoperative pulsatility index was higher in the pulsatile subset of both acyanotic and cyanotic groups (<i>P</i> < .05), regional cerebral oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and gaseous microemboli counts were similar. Postoperative PELOD-2 scores decreased at similar rates in the acyanotic and cyanotic subgroups regardless of the perfusion modality utilized. There were also no significant between-group differences in the additional postoperative outcomes by perfusion modality in either acyanotic or cyanotic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite patients undergoing pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass experiencing a more physiologic pulsatility index in both acyanotic and cyanotic groups, no significant differences in cerebral hemodynamics or clinical outcomes were appreciated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94270,"journal":{"name":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","volume":" ","pages":"21501351241288835"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351241288835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study objective was to determine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion modalities on cerebral hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in congenital cardiac surgery patients stratified by acyanotic versus cyanotic heart disease.

Methods: A total of 159 pediatric (age <18 years) cardiac surgery patients were prospectively randomized to pulsatile or nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and stratified by type of congenital heart disease: acyanotic versus cyanotic. Intraoperative cerebral gaseous microemboli counts and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index were assessed. Organ injury was quantified by Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Additional outcomes included Pediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score, vasoactive-inotropic score, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, and 180-day mortality. Heterogenous variance linear models (ie, ANOVA and mixed models) and χ2 tests were used to compare groups for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Results: Within congenital heart disease subgroups, patients randomized to nonpulsatile versus pulsatile bypass had similar preoperative and operative characteristics. While the intraoperative pulsatility index was higher in the pulsatile subset of both acyanotic and cyanotic groups (P < .05), regional cerebral oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and gaseous microemboli counts were similar. Postoperative PELOD-2 scores decreased at similar rates in the acyanotic and cyanotic subgroups regardless of the perfusion modality utilized. There were also no significant between-group differences in the additional postoperative outcomes by perfusion modality in either acyanotic or cyanotic groups.

Conclusions: Despite patients undergoing pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass experiencing a more physiologic pulsatility index in both acyanotic and cyanotic groups, no significant differences in cerebral hemodynamics or clinical outcomes were appreciated.

紫绀型和无绀型先心病手术中搏动性和非搏动性血流的随机试验。
背景:研究目的是确定体外循环灌注方式对先天性心脏手术患者脑血流动力学和临床结果的影响,这些患者分为无青绀型和紫绀型心脏病。方法:采用159项2岁儿童试验,分别对连续变量和分类变量进行组间比较。结果:在先天性心脏病亚组中,随机分配到非搏动和搏动搭桥的患者具有相似的术前和手术特征。结论:尽管接受搏动式体外循环的患者在无氰和青紫两组中都经历了更高的生理性搏动指数,但在脑血流动力学和临床结果方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信