HIPPO artificial intelligence: Correlating automated radiographic femoroacetabular measurements with patient-reported outcomes in developmental hip dysplasia.

Ahmed Alshaikhsalama, Holden Archer, Yin Xi, Richard Ljuhar, Joel E Wells, Avneesh Chhabra
{"title":"HIPPO artificial intelligence: Correlating automated radiographic femoroacetabular measurements with patient-reported outcomes in developmental hip dysplasia.","authors":"Ahmed Alshaikhsalama, Holden Archer, Yin Xi, Richard Ljuhar, Joel E Wells, Avneesh Chhabra","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.99359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip dysplasia (HD) is characterized by insufficient acetabular coverage of the femoral head, leading to a predisposition for osteoarthritis. While radiographic measurements such as the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle are essential in evaluating HD severity, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer insights into the subjective health impact on patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the correlations between machine-learning automated and manual radiographic measurements of HD and PROMs with the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI)-generated HD measurements indicating less severe dysplasia correlate with better PROMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study evaluating 256 hips from 130 HD patients from a hip preservation clinic database. Manual and AI-derived radiographic measurements were collected and PROMs such as the Harris hip score (HHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), short form (SF) 12 (SF-12), and Visual Analogue Scale of the European Quality of Life Group survey were correlated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 28.6 years (range 15.7-62.3 years) with 82.3% of patients being women and 17.7% being men. The median interpretation time for manual readers and AI ranged between 4-12 minutes per patient and 31 seconds, respectively. Manual measurements exhibited weak correlations with HHS, including LCEA (<i>r</i> = 0.18) and Tönnis angle (<i>r</i> = -0.24). AI-derived metrics showed similar weak correlations, with the most significant being Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal (CCD) with iHOT-12 at <i>r</i> = -0.25 (<i>P</i> = 0.042) and CCD with SF-12 at <i>r</i> = 0.25 (<i>P</i> = 0.048). Other measured correlations were not significant (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests AI can aid in HD assessment, but weak PROM correlations highlight their continued importance in predicting subjective health and outcomes, complementing AI-derived measurements in HD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":"99359"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v14.i4.99359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip dysplasia (HD) is characterized by insufficient acetabular coverage of the femoral head, leading to a predisposition for osteoarthritis. While radiographic measurements such as the lateral center edge angle (LCEA) and Tönnis angle are essential in evaluating HD severity, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) offer insights into the subjective health impact on patients.

Aim: To investigate the correlations between machine-learning automated and manual radiographic measurements of HD and PROMs with the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI)-generated HD measurements indicating less severe dysplasia correlate with better PROMs.

Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 256 hips from 130 HD patients from a hip preservation clinic database. Manual and AI-derived radiographic measurements were collected and PROMs such as the Harris hip score (HHS), international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12), short form (SF) 12 (SF-12), and Visual Analogue Scale of the European Quality of Life Group survey were correlated using Spearman's rank-order correlation.

Results: The median patient age was 28.6 years (range 15.7-62.3 years) with 82.3% of patients being women and 17.7% being men. The median interpretation time for manual readers and AI ranged between 4-12 minutes per patient and 31 seconds, respectively. Manual measurements exhibited weak correlations with HHS, including LCEA (r = 0.18) and Tönnis angle (r = -0.24). AI-derived metrics showed similar weak correlations, with the most significant being Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal (CCD) with iHOT-12 at r = -0.25 (P = 0.042) and CCD with SF-12 at r = 0.25 (P = 0.048). Other measured correlations were not significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: This study suggests AI can aid in HD assessment, but weak PROM correlations highlight their continued importance in predicting subjective health and outcomes, complementing AI-derived measurements in HD management.

HIPPO人工智能:将股骨髋臼自动x线测量与发育性髋关节发育不良患者报告的结果相关联。
背景:髋关节发育不良(HD)的特点是股骨头髋臼覆盖不足,易患骨关节炎。虽然放射测量如外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)和Tönnis角在评估HD严重程度中是必不可少的,但患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)提供了对患者主观健康影响的见解。目的:在人工智能(AI)生成的HD测量结果表明不太严重的发育不良与更好的PROMs相关的假设下,研究机器学习自动和手动HD测量与PROMs之间的相关性。方法:回顾性研究评估来自髋关节保存临床数据库的130例HD患者的256个髋关节。收集手工和人工智能衍生的放射测量数据,并使用Spearman秩序相关将Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-12)、简短形式(SF) 12 (SF-12)和欧洲生活质量组调查的视觉模拟量表等PROMs进行相关。结果:患者中位年龄为28.6岁(15.7-62.3岁),82.3%为女性,17.7%为男性。人工读取器和人工智能的中位解读时间分别在每位患者4-12分钟和31秒之间。人工测量与HHS的相关性较弱,包括LCEA (r = 0.18)和Tönnis角度(r = -0.24)。ai衍生的指标也显示出类似的弱相关性,其中最显著的是caput - collam - diaphyseal (CCD)与iHOT-12在r = -0.25 (P = 0.042), CCD与SF-12在r = 0.25 (P = 0.048)。其他测量相关性不显著(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究表明人工智能可以帮助HD评估,但弱的PROM相关性突出了它们在预测主观健康和结果方面的持续重要性,补充了人工智能衍生的HD管理测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信