Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy: Evolution, Pearls, and Pitfalls of Treatment.

Laura E Davis, Adam Calaway, Eric A Singer, Shawn Dason
{"title":"Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Immunotherapy: Evolution, Pearls, and Pitfalls of Treatment.","authors":"Laura E Davis, Adam Calaway, Eric A Singer, Shawn Dason","doi":"10.33696/immunology.6.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is among the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in both genders with over 81,000 estimated cases in 2024. Despite increasing incidence of renal cell carcinomas <4 cm, up to 1/3 of patients diagnosed with RCC exhibit metastatic disease (mRCC) at time of diagnosis. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), a procedure which encompasses the surgical removal of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic disease, was offered upfront as standard of care during the cytokine era; however, as systemic treatment has evolved, the role of CN in mRCC patients has become less clear.</p><p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>We sought to review the evolution of CN in mRCC patients from historical treatments through current standard of care considering ongoing clinical trials and perioperative considerations for CN in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CN following immunotherapy is safe and beneficial in appropriately selected patients. The choice to perform CN in patients with mRCC amidst an ever-changing treatment landscape is nuanced. Clinical trial enrollment is critical to refine selection criteria and timing of CN. As treatment options continue to progress, shared decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration remain paramount in selecting the optimal treatment course for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":73644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cellular immunology","volume":"6 4","pages":"163-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cellular immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.6.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is among the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in both genders with over 81,000 estimated cases in 2024. Despite increasing incidence of renal cell carcinomas <4 cm, up to 1/3 of patients diagnosed with RCC exhibit metastatic disease (mRCC) at time of diagnosis. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), a procedure which encompasses the surgical removal of the primary tumor in patients with metastatic disease, was offered upfront as standard of care during the cytokine era; however, as systemic treatment has evolved, the role of CN in mRCC patients has become less clear.

Purpose of review: We sought to review the evolution of CN in mRCC patients from historical treatments through current standard of care considering ongoing clinical trials and perioperative considerations for CN in patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Conclusion: CN following immunotherapy is safe and beneficial in appropriately selected patients. The choice to perform CN in patients with mRCC amidst an ever-changing treatment landscape is nuanced. Clinical trial enrollment is critical to refine selection criteria and timing of CN. As treatment options continue to progress, shared decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration remain paramount in selecting the optimal treatment course for each patient.

免疫治疗后的细胞减少性肾切除术:发展,珍珠和治疗陷阱。
肾细胞癌(RCC)是男女中最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,2024年估计病例超过81,000例。尽管肾细胞癌的发病率越来越高,但综述的目的:我们试图回顾mRCC患者CN的演变,通过当前的护理标准,考虑到正在进行的临床试验和使用酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的患者CN的围手术期考虑。结论:在适当选择的患者中,免疫治疗后CN是安全有益的。在不断变化的治疗环境中,对mRCC患者进行CN的选择是微妙的。临床试验入组对于完善CN的选择标准和时机至关重要。随着治疗方案的不断进步,共同决策和多学科合作在为每位患者选择最佳治疗方案方面仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信