A randomized controlled trial of Native CHOICES: Impact on alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk reduction among American Indian and Alaska Native women

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jessica Hanson, Carolyn Noonan, Kyra Oziel, Karen Little Wounded, Serea Darnell, Robert Rosenman, Marcia O'Leary, Richard MacLehose, Michelle Sarche, Dedra Buchwald
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of Native CHOICES: Impact on alcohol-exposed pregnancy risk reduction among American Indian and Alaska Native women","authors":"Jessica Hanson,&nbsp;Carolyn Noonan,&nbsp;Kyra Oziel,&nbsp;Karen Little Wounded,&nbsp;Serea Darnell,&nbsp;Robert Rosenman,&nbsp;Marcia O'Leary,&nbsp;Richard MacLehose,&nbsp;Michelle Sarche,&nbsp;Dedra Buchwald","doi":"10.1111/acer.15521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Prevention of alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP) involves reducing risky alcohol consumption among women at-risk for pregnancy, using effective contraception among women drinking at risky levels to prevent pregnancy, or both. This study presents the outcomes of a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of Native CHOICES, a culturally tailored adaptation of the CHOICES intervention, among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>AI/AN women aged 18–44 who were at-risk for an AEP were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Native CHOICES intervention or a waitlist control group. Native CHOICES comprised two sessions of motivational interviewing and an elective contraception counseling session. Data were collected at baseline, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postbaseline. Due to the pandemic, the intervention was at times delivered remotely.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 404 women participated: 199 in the control group and 205 in the intervention group. Sixty-seven percent of the intervention group received the intervention in-person, and 33% participated by telephone or video call. Sixty-four percent of women completed all follow-up visits. At the six-month follow-up, the intervention did not demonstrate a significant impact on AEP risk compared with the control arm when analyzing all the data (RR = 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–1.07). However, an exploratory subgroup analysis showed evidence of a reduction in AEP risk among participants who completed the study in-person before the COVID-19 pandemic (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63–0.98), which was not observed during or after the pandemic (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91–1.24).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Native CHOICES intervention did not show evidence of effectiveness overall. However, exploratory analyses offer some evidence that the intervention was effective prior to the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 2","pages":"488-498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acer.15521","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prevention of alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP) involves reducing risky alcohol consumption among women at-risk for pregnancy, using effective contraception among women drinking at risky levels to prevent pregnancy, or both. This study presents the outcomes of a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of Native CHOICES, a culturally tailored adaptation of the CHOICES intervention, among American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women.

Methods

AI/AN women aged 18–44 who were at-risk for an AEP were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Native CHOICES intervention or a waitlist control group. Native CHOICES comprised two sessions of motivational interviewing and an elective contraception counseling session. Data were collected at baseline, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postbaseline. Due to the pandemic, the intervention was at times delivered remotely.

Results

A total of 404 women participated: 199 in the control group and 205 in the intervention group. Sixty-seven percent of the intervention group received the intervention in-person, and 33% participated by telephone or video call. Sixty-four percent of women completed all follow-up visits. At the six-month follow-up, the intervention did not demonstrate a significant impact on AEP risk compared with the control arm when analyzing all the data (RR = 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–1.07). However, an exploratory subgroup analysis showed evidence of a reduction in AEP risk among participants who completed the study in-person before the COVID-19 pandemic (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63–0.98), which was not observed during or after the pandemic (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91–1.24).

Conclusions

The Native CHOICES intervention did not show evidence of effectiveness overall. However, exploratory analyses offer some evidence that the intervention was effective prior to the pandemic.

Abstract Image

土著选择的随机对照试验:对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加土著妇女酒精暴露怀孕风险降低的影响。
背景:预防酒精暴露性怀孕(AEP)包括减少有怀孕风险的妇女的危险饮酒,在饮酒危险水平的妇女中使用有效的避孕措施来预防怀孕,或两者兼而有之。本研究介绍了一项随机对照试验的结果,该试验评估了印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)妇女中印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)干预措施的文化适应性,即土著选择的疗效。方法:年龄在18-44岁有AEP风险的AI/AN女性以1:1的比例随机分配到Native CHOICES干预组或等候名单对照组。原生选择包括两个环节的动机性访谈和一个选择性避孕咨询环节。在基线、基线后6周、3个月和6个月收集数据。由于大流行,干预措施有时是远程提供的。结果:共404名女性参与,对照组199名,干预组205名。干预组中67%的人亲自接受了干预,33%的人通过电话或视频电话参与了干预。64%的女性完成了所有的随访。在6个月的随访中,分析所有数据时,与对照组相比,干预对AEP风险没有显着影响(RR = 0.94;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.83-1.07)。然而,探索性亚组分析显示,在COVID-19大流行之前亲自完成研究的参与者中,AEP风险降低的证据(RR = 0.79;95% CI: 0.63-0.98),在大流行期间或之后未观察到(RR = 1.06;95% ci: 0.91-1.24)。结论:Native CHOICES干预总体上没有显示出有效的证据。然而,探索性分析提供了一些证据,表明干预措施在大流行之前是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信