Jordan Khorsandi, Daniel Kraversky, Jack Martinyan, Prashant Parekh, Grettel Castro, Noël Barengo
{"title":"Association between insurance status and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with diabetes in the United States from 2011 to 2020.","authors":"Jordan Khorsandi, Daniel Kraversky, Jack Martinyan, Prashant Parekh, Grettel Castro, Noël Barengo","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether an association exists between health insurance and diabetic retinopathy (DR) prevalence in adults with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. 4530 Patients aged ≥ 18 with diabetes from 2011 to 2020 with various insurance types (no insurance, private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated for prevalence of DR, including covariates. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis were conducted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant association between insurance status and DR prevalence when adjusting for confounders. OR for DR in patients without insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or other insurance compared to those with private insurance were 1.13 (95 % CI 0.74-1.71), 0.78 (95 % CI 0.54-1.13), 1.20 (95 % CI 0.80-1.81), and 0.81 (95 % CI 0.47-1.37) respectively. However, factors like age ≥ 65 and use of diabetes medication were associated with reduced DR prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although insurance status alone does not have an association with the prevalence of DR, this study highlights several confounding variables that potentially influence previously reported associations between insurance status and DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To determine whether an association exists between health insurance and diabetic retinopathy (DR) prevalence in adults with diabetes.
Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database. 4530 Patients aged ≥ 18 with diabetes from 2011 to 2020 with various insurance types (no insurance, private, Medicare, Medicaid, or other) were evaluated for prevalence of DR, including covariates. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analysis were conducted to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results: There was no significant association between insurance status and DR prevalence when adjusting for confounders. OR for DR in patients without insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or other insurance compared to those with private insurance were 1.13 (95 % CI 0.74-1.71), 0.78 (95 % CI 0.54-1.13), 1.20 (95 % CI 0.80-1.81), and 0.81 (95 % CI 0.47-1.37) respectively. However, factors like age ≥ 65 and use of diabetes medication were associated with reduced DR prevalence.
Conclusion: Although insurance status alone does not have an association with the prevalence of DR, this study highlights several confounding variables that potentially influence previously reported associations between insurance status and DR.
目的:确定健康保险与成人糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患病率之间是否存在关联。方法:利用国家健康与营养检查调查数据库进行分析性横断面研究。4530例年龄≥ 18岁的2011 - 2020年各种保险类型(无保险、私人、医疗保险、医疗补助或其他)的糖尿病患者进行了DR患病率评估,包括协变量。进行未校正和校正logistic回归分析,计算优势比(OR)和95% %置信区间(CI)。结果:在调整混杂因素后,保险状况与DR患病率之间没有显著关联。无保险、医疗保险、医疗补助或其他保险的患者与有私人保险的患者相比,DR的OR分别为1.13(95 % CI 0.74-1.71)、0.78(95 % CI 0.54-1.13)、1.20(95 % CI 0.80-1.81)和0.81(95 % CI 0.47-1.37)。然而,年龄≥ 65岁和使用糖尿病药物等因素与DR患病率降低有关。结论:虽然保险状况本身与DR患病率没有关联,但本研究强调了几个可能影响先前报道的保险状况与DR之间关联的混杂变量。