Association between driving pressure, systemic inflammation and non-pulmonary organ dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a prospective pathophysiological study

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Enric Barbeta , Carlos Ferrando , Rubén López-Aladid , Anna Motos , Letícia Bueno-Freire , Laia Fernández-Barat , Alba Soler-Comas , Andrea Palomeque , Albert Gabarrús , Antonio Artigas , Marta Camprubí-Rimblas , Gianluigi Li Bassi , Teresa López-Sobrino , Elena Sandoval , David Toapanta , Sara Fernández , Ricard Mellado-Artigas , Luigi Zattera , Jordi Vallverdú , John G. Laffey , Antoni Torres
{"title":"Association between driving pressure, systemic inflammation and non-pulmonary organ dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, a prospective pathophysiological study","authors":"Enric Barbeta ,&nbsp;Carlos Ferrando ,&nbsp;Rubén López-Aladid ,&nbsp;Anna Motos ,&nbsp;Letícia Bueno-Freire ,&nbsp;Laia Fernández-Barat ,&nbsp;Alba Soler-Comas ,&nbsp;Andrea Palomeque ,&nbsp;Albert Gabarrús ,&nbsp;Antonio Artigas ,&nbsp;Marta Camprubí-Rimblas ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Li Bassi ,&nbsp;Teresa López-Sobrino ,&nbsp;Elena Sandoval ,&nbsp;David Toapanta ,&nbsp;Sara Fernández ,&nbsp;Ricard Mellado-Artigas ,&nbsp;Luigi Zattera ,&nbsp;Jordi Vallverdú ,&nbsp;John G. Laffey ,&nbsp;Antoni Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Driving pressure is thought to determine the effect of low tidal ventilation on survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The leading cause of mortality in these patients is non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction, which is believed to worsen due to the biological response to mechanical ventilation (biotrauma). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the association between driving pressure, biotrauma, and non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction. Additionally, we analyzed this relationship for tidal volume/predicted body weight.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study that included adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation admitted to the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain, between June 2019 and February 2021. We conducted mixed-effects models to assess the effects of driving pressure and tidal volume/predicted body weight on the evolution of 22 log-transformed biomarker variables during the first, third, and fifth days after study enrollment. These 22 systemic biomarkers characterized epithelial and endothelial pulmonary dysfunction, inflammation, and coagulation disorders in the included patients. In the same fashion, the association between driving pressure and non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction was evaluated by the non-pulmonary sequential organ failure assessment score (non-pulmonary SOFA) and its associated variables. Finally, we performed mediation analyses to assess whether the relationship between biomarkers and driving pressure was mediated by other ventilator-induced lung injury parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-eight patients were included. Driving pressure was independently associated with soluble Receptor for advanced glycation end-products, Interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, Interferon-ɣ, Chemokine (C-C motif)-2, Vascular endothelial growth factor, Tissue factor, Protein C, Protein S, and higher dose of norepinephrine. However, this relationship attenuated over time. In contrast, tidal volume/predicted body weight was not associated with any of the 22 biomarkers tested . A concomitant increase in positive end-inspiratory plateau pressure or tidal volume did not mediate the effect of driving pressure on biomarkers. Conversely, the association between compliance of the respiratory system and pulmonary epithelial dysfunction was primarily mediated by driving pressure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Driving pressure, but not tidal volume/predicted body weight, was correlated with epithelial and endothelial pulmonary dysfunction, inflammation, coagulation disorders, and hemodynamic dysfunction. However, this relationship diminished over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48762,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"Article 101458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352556824001164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Driving pressure is thought to determine the effect of low tidal ventilation on survival in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The leading cause of mortality in these patients is non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction, which is believed to worsen due to the biological response to mechanical ventilation (biotrauma). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the association between driving pressure, biotrauma, and non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction. Additionally, we analyzed this relationship for tidal volume/predicted body weight.

Methods

Observational study that included adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation admitted to the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain, between June 2019 and February 2021. We conducted mixed-effects models to assess the effects of driving pressure and tidal volume/predicted body weight on the evolution of 22 log-transformed biomarker variables during the first, third, and fifth days after study enrollment. These 22 systemic biomarkers characterized epithelial and endothelial pulmonary dysfunction, inflammation, and coagulation disorders in the included patients. In the same fashion, the association between driving pressure and non-pulmonary multiorgan dysfunction was evaluated by the non-pulmonary sequential organ failure assessment score (non-pulmonary SOFA) and its associated variables. Finally, we performed mediation analyses to assess whether the relationship between biomarkers and driving pressure was mediated by other ventilator-induced lung injury parameters.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were included. Driving pressure was independently associated with soluble Receptor for advanced glycation end-products, Interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, Interferon-ɣ, Chemokine (C-C motif)-2, Vascular endothelial growth factor, Tissue factor, Protein C, Protein S, and higher dose of norepinephrine. However, this relationship attenuated over time. In contrast, tidal volume/predicted body weight was not associated with any of the 22 biomarkers tested . A concomitant increase in positive end-inspiratory plateau pressure or tidal volume did not mediate the effect of driving pressure on biomarkers. Conversely, the association between compliance of the respiratory system and pulmonary epithelial dysfunction was primarily mediated by driving pressure.

Conclusions

Driving pressure, but not tidal volume/predicted body weight, was correlated with epithelial and endothelial pulmonary dysfunction, inflammation, coagulation disorders, and hemodynamic dysfunction. However, this relationship diminished over time.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者驾驶压力、全身炎症和非肺器官功能障碍的相关性:一项前瞻性病理生理学研究。
背景:驾驶压力被认为决定了低潮通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者生存的影响。这些患者死亡的主要原因是非肺多器官功能障碍,这被认为是由于对机械通气的生物反应(生物创伤)而恶化。因此,我们的目的是分析驱动压力、生物创伤和非肺多器官功能障碍之间的关系。此外,我们还分析了潮汐量与预测体重之间的关系。方法:观察性研究纳入2019年6月至2021年2月在西班牙巴塞罗那医院诊所接受有创机械通气的急性呼吸窘迫综合征成年患者。我们采用混合效应模型来评估驾驶压力和潮汐体积/预测体重对研究入组后第1、3和5天22个对数转换生物标志物变量演变的影响。在纳入的患者中,这22个系统性生物标志物表征了肺上皮和内皮功能障碍、炎症和凝血障碍。以同样的方式,通过非肺顺序器官衰竭评估评分(non-pulmonary SOFA)及其相关变量来评估驱动压与非肺多器官功能障碍之间的关系。最后,我们进行了中介分析,以评估生物标志物和驱动压力之间的关系是否由其他呼吸机诱导的肺损伤参数介导。结果:纳入38例患者。驱动压力与晚期糖基化终产物可溶性受体、白细胞介素(IL)-8、IL-6、IL-10、IL-17、干扰素- γ、趋化因子(C-C基元)-2、血管内皮生长因子、组织因子、蛋白C、蛋白S和高剂量去甲肾上腺素独立相关。然而,这种关系随着时间的推移而减弱。相比之下,潮汐体积/预测体重与测试的22种生物标志物中的任何一种反应都无关。同时增加的吸气终末平台正压或潮气量并不能调节驱动压力对生物标志物的影响。相反,呼吸系统顺应性与肺上皮功能障碍之间的关联主要由驱动压力介导。结论:驾驶压力与肺上皮和内皮功能障碍、炎症、凝血障碍和血流动力学功能障碍相关,而与潮气量/预测体重无关。然而,这种关系随着时间的推移而减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain Medicine (formerly Annales Françaises d''Anesthésie et de Réanimation) publishes in English the highest quality original material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信