Solving the Mystery of Sir William Osler and Acupuncture: How Knowledge and Prevailing Attitudes Shaped a Physician.

IF 0.8 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1089/acu.2024.0083
Barbara de la Torre
{"title":"Solving the Mystery of Sir William Osler and Acupuncture: How Knowledge and Prevailing Attitudes Shaped a Physician.","authors":"Barbara de la Torre","doi":"10.1089/acu.2024.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education in North America was shaped by a biomedically bounded framework dating back to the early nineteenth century. Yet, one renowned physician, William Osler (1849-1919), seemed to stand out among his contemporaries by promoting acupuncture as a form of treatment. Some physicians in the early 1970s proposed that Osler was ahead of his time by including acupuncture in his medical textbook, <i>The Principles and Practice of Medicine</i> (1892). Others, however, dismissed this notion based on an alleged biographical account that Osler's only witnessed acupuncture treatment was embarrassingly ineffective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The question that should garner more attention from the medical acupuncturist is not whether Osler <i>was</i> an acupuncturist. The key question should be: Why was Osler <i>not</i> an acupuncturist? This article explores what may have discouraged William Osler from pursuing and promoting acupuncture as a legitimate system of medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research includes the analysis of all primary and secondary sources connecting William Osler to acupuncture, including <i>The Principles and Practice of Medicine, The Life of Sir William Osler</i>, <i>The Evolution of Modern Medicine, and Bibliotheca Osleriana</i>. Additional sources, including research by two prominent Osler scholars, letters, bulletins, archives, and film, were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of all available historical material demonstrates compelling evidence that Osler was not an acupuncturist. Contributing factors included limited access to knowledge, inadequate training, and prevailing attitudes during his lifetime.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Creating a more prominent place for medical acupuncture in healthcare requires deep reflection into the history of what forms a physician's worldview. Understanding what led to Osler's knowledge and attitude toward acupuncture could inspire innovative strategies to encourage more Western physicians to train in East Asian medicine and integrate it into practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"36 6","pages":"323-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2024.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical education in North America was shaped by a biomedically bounded framework dating back to the early nineteenth century. Yet, one renowned physician, William Osler (1849-1919), seemed to stand out among his contemporaries by promoting acupuncture as a form of treatment. Some physicians in the early 1970s proposed that Osler was ahead of his time by including acupuncture in his medical textbook, The Principles and Practice of Medicine (1892). Others, however, dismissed this notion based on an alleged biographical account that Osler's only witnessed acupuncture treatment was embarrassingly ineffective.

Objective: The question that should garner more attention from the medical acupuncturist is not whether Osler was an acupuncturist. The key question should be: Why was Osler not an acupuncturist? This article explores what may have discouraged William Osler from pursuing and promoting acupuncture as a legitimate system of medicine.

Methods: This research includes the analysis of all primary and secondary sources connecting William Osler to acupuncture, including The Principles and Practice of Medicine, The Life of Sir William Osler, The Evolution of Modern Medicine, and Bibliotheca Osleriana. Additional sources, including research by two prominent Osler scholars, letters, bulletins, archives, and film, were evaluated.

Results: Analysis of all available historical material demonstrates compelling evidence that Osler was not an acupuncturist. Contributing factors included limited access to knowledge, inadequate training, and prevailing attitudes during his lifetime.

Conclusions: Creating a more prominent place for medical acupuncture in healthcare requires deep reflection into the history of what forms a physician's worldview. Understanding what led to Osler's knowledge and attitude toward acupuncture could inspire innovative strategies to encourage more Western physicians to train in East Asian medicine and integrate it into practice.

解开威廉·奥斯勒爵士和针灸之谜:知识和主流态度如何塑造了一位医生。
背景:北美的医学教育是由可追溯到19世纪早期的生物医学框架形成的。然而,一位著名的医生威廉·奥斯勒(William Osler, 1849-1919)似乎在他的同时代人中脱颖而出,他提倡针灸作为一种治疗方式。20世纪70年代早期,一些医生提出,奥斯勒将针灸纳入他的医学教科书《医学原理与实践》(1892年),这是超前的。然而,另一些人则驳斥了这一观点,理由是根据一份据称是奥斯勒的传记记载,奥斯勒唯一亲眼目睹的针灸治疗是令人尴尬的无效。目的:医学针灸师更应该关注的问题不是奥斯勒是否是针灸师。关键问题应该是:为什么奥斯勒不是针灸师?这篇文章探讨了是什么阻碍了威廉·奥斯勒追求和推广针灸作为一种合法的医学体系。方法:本研究包括分析所有将威廉·奥斯勒与针灸联系起来的第一手和二手资料,包括《医学原理与实践》、《威廉·奥斯勒爵士的一生》、《现代医学的演变》和《奥斯勒图书馆》。其他来源,包括两位著名奥斯勒学者的研究、信件、公告、档案和电影,都被评估。结果:对所有可获得的历史资料的分析显示了令人信服的证据,证明奥斯勒不是针灸师。造成这种情况的因素包括他一生中获得知识的机会有限、培训不足以及普遍的态度。结论:要让医学针灸在医疗保健中占据更突出的位置,需要深入反思医生世界观形成的历史。了解是什么导致了奥斯勒对针灸的认识和态度,可以激发创新的策略,鼓励更多的西方医生接受东亚医学的培训,并将其融入实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信