The Role of Respect and Collaborative Decision Making on Diabetes Care Factors Among Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age With Diabetes in the United States.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241309474
Grace Ellen Brannon, Tiffany B Kindratt, Kyrah K Brown
{"title":"The Role of Respect and Collaborative Decision Making on Diabetes Care Factors Among Nonpregnant Women of Reproductive Age With Diabetes in the United States.","authors":"Grace Ellen Brannon, Tiffany B Kindratt, Kyrah K Brown","doi":"10.1177/23743735241309474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2010-2018) to examine associations between diabetes patients' satisfaction with their provider and ratings of healthcare received, diabetes care self-efficacy, and monitoring adherence among nonpregnant reproductive age women with diabetes. The sample included nonpregnant women of childbearing age (18-45) with diabetes mellitus (n = 767; weighted n = 1.3 million women). The results indicated that patients who reported that their usual care provider always asked/showed respect for medical, traditional, and alternative treatments that the person is happy with had 2.59 times greater odds (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.32-5.10) of giving high ratings of healthcare (8-10) compared to those whose provider did not show respect for treatments. Results also showed that patients who reported they were asked to decide between a choice of treatments had 1.76 greater odds (95% CI:1.03-3.01) of diabetes care monitoring adherence. Findings demonstrate the importance of patient-centered communication experiences in relation to diabetes care monitoring adherence. Implications of the findings for clinical encounters are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241309474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241309474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2010-2018) to examine associations between diabetes patients' satisfaction with their provider and ratings of healthcare received, diabetes care self-efficacy, and monitoring adherence among nonpregnant reproductive age women with diabetes. The sample included nonpregnant women of childbearing age (18-45) with diabetes mellitus (n = 767; weighted n = 1.3 million women). The results indicated that patients who reported that their usual care provider always asked/showed respect for medical, traditional, and alternative treatments that the person is happy with had 2.59 times greater odds (95% confidence interval [CI]:1.32-5.10) of giving high ratings of healthcare (8-10) compared to those whose provider did not show respect for treatments. Results also showed that patients who reported they were asked to decide between a choice of treatments had 1.76 greater odds (95% CI:1.03-3.01) of diabetes care monitoring adherence. Findings demonstrate the importance of patient-centered communication experiences in relation to diabetes care monitoring adherence. Implications of the findings for clinical encounters are discussed.

尊重和协作决策在美国非怀孕育龄糖尿病患者糖尿病护理因素中的作用
本研究使用医疗支出小组调查数据(2010-2018)来研究糖尿病患者对其提供者的满意度与接受的医疗保健评分、糖尿病护理自我效能和监测依从性之间的关系。样本包括患有糖尿病的育龄(18-45岁)未怀孕妇女(n = 767;加权n = 130万女性)。结果表明,那些报告他们的常规护理提供者总是要求/表现出对自己满意的医疗、传统和替代治疗的尊重的患者,与那些提供者没有表现出对治疗的尊重的患者相比,给予医疗保健高评级(8-10)的几率(95%置信区间[CI]:1.32-5.10)高出2.59倍。结果还显示,被要求在两种治疗方案之间做出选择的患者,糖尿病护理监测依从性的几率高出1.76 (95% CI:1.03-3.01)。研究结果表明,以患者为中心的沟通经验对糖尿病护理监测依从性的重要性。研究结果对临床接触的意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信