Chenan Liu, Li Deng, Shiqi Lin, Tong Liu, Jiangshan Ren, Jinyu Shi, Heyang Zhang, Hailun Xie, Yue Chen, Xin Zheng, ZhaoTing Bu, Hanping Shi
{"title":"Enteral nutrition support in patients with cancer: association of short-term prognosis and medical costs with inflammation.","authors":"Chenan Liu, Li Deng, Shiqi Lin, Tong Liu, Jiangshan Ren, Jinyu Shi, Heyang Zhang, Hailun Xie, Yue Chen, Xin Zheng, ZhaoTing Bu, Hanping Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09085-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enteral nutrition (EN) is commonly used for nutritional support in patients with cancer. Whether inflammation, one of the driving factors of malnutrition and cancer, affects the association between EN and short-term prognosis and medical costs in patients with cancer remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between EN and short-term prognosis of patients with cancer and the effect of inflammation on EN-associated medical costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre prospective cohort study evaluated patients with pathologically confirmed solid tumours. After admission, all patients who received EN, including oral or tube feeding, were assigned to the EN group. The log-rank test was used to identify the optimal cutoff values for inflammatory markers. Cox regression analysis was used to analyse the associations among EN, inflammation, and prognosis. Propensity score matching was used to balance biases between the EN and non-EN groups and validate the stability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5121 patients were included, with 2965 (57.90%) men and an average age of 59.06 (11.30) years. A total of 462 patients received EN, with 390 (84.4%) receiving oral nutritional supplementation. During the 90-day follow-up, 304 patients died. In the low inflammation group, there was no association between EN and short-term prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-2.18). In the high inflammation group, EN significantly improved the short-term prognosis (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.30-0.76). In patients with low inflammation (p < 0.001), EN increased hospitalisation costs (p < 0.001) without reducing length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.15). In patients with high inflammation, EN did not increase hospitalisation expenses (p = 0.47) but reduced the LOS (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EN can improve the short-term prognosis of patients with high inflammation and reduce LOS without increasing the hospitalisation expenses. Baseline inflammation levels may serve as effective indicators for personalised and precise EN treatment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR1800020329 (chictr.org.cn).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09085-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Enteral nutrition (EN) is commonly used for nutritional support in patients with cancer. Whether inflammation, one of the driving factors of malnutrition and cancer, affects the association between EN and short-term prognosis and medical costs in patients with cancer remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between EN and short-term prognosis of patients with cancer and the effect of inflammation on EN-associated medical costs.
Methods: This multicentre prospective cohort study evaluated patients with pathologically confirmed solid tumours. After admission, all patients who received EN, including oral or tube feeding, were assigned to the EN group. The log-rank test was used to identify the optimal cutoff values for inflammatory markers. Cox regression analysis was used to analyse the associations among EN, inflammation, and prognosis. Propensity score matching was used to balance biases between the EN and non-EN groups and validate the stability of the results.
Results: A total of 5121 patients were included, with 2965 (57.90%) men and an average age of 59.06 (11.30) years. A total of 462 patients received EN, with 390 (84.4%) receiving oral nutritional supplementation. During the 90-day follow-up, 304 patients died. In the low inflammation group, there was no association between EN and short-term prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-2.18). In the high inflammation group, EN significantly improved the short-term prognosis (HR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.30-0.76). In patients with low inflammation (p < 0.001), EN increased hospitalisation costs (p < 0.001) without reducing length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.15). In patients with high inflammation, EN did not increase hospitalisation expenses (p = 0.47) but reduced the LOS (p = 0.004).
Conclusion: EN can improve the short-term prognosis of patients with high inflammation and reduce LOS without increasing the hospitalisation expenses. Baseline inflammation levels may serve as effective indicators for personalised and precise EN treatment.
期刊介绍：
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
