Exploring the Feasibility of a Caregiver Burden-Mastery Hybrid Assessment Tool With Decision Matrix in a Memory Clinic: A Multimethod Study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608241307002
Ee Yuee Chan, Zhi Lei Ong, George Frederick Glass, Siew Ling Ang, Jun Pei Lim, Noorhazlina Binte Ali, Wee Shiong Lim
{"title":"Exploring the Feasibility of a Caregiver Burden-Mastery Hybrid Assessment Tool With Decision Matrix in a Memory Clinic: A Multimethod Study.","authors":"Ee Yuee Chan, Zhi Lei Ong, George Frederick Glass, Siew Ling Ang, Jun Pei Lim, Noorhazlina Binte Ali, Wee Shiong Lim","doi":"10.1177/23779608241307002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family members caring for a person living with dementia (PWD) can experience caregiver burden, leading to psychological distress if unmanaged. It's essential for healthcare professionals, especially nurses to identify caregivers at risk of stress and depression, triggering prompt management during their contact with caregivers of PWD. The study team developed an evidence-based caregiver burden-mastery hybrid assessment and intervention decision matrix (CHAT-MI) for caregivers of PWD and examined its feasibility of use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the feasibility and usability of implementing the CHAT-MI assessment-decision matrix tool in an outpatient setting in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHAT-MI was developed through earlier research, research evidence, clinical guidelines, and expert opinion. A multimethod study was conducted in a Singapore outpatient memory clinic from November 2020 to January 2021. Caregivers of PWD who attended the clinic self-administered the assessment tool to determine their burden and personal mastery levels. Clinicians used a decision matrix to guide interventions based on the assessments. Feedback was gathered from both caregivers and clinicians through surveys and semistructured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four caregivers and six clinicians participated in the study. Caregivers found the burden-mastery assessment tool relatively easy to use and understand and helpful. Clinicians found the assessment-decision matrix tool acceptable, feasible, and useful, enhancing standard care by providing insights into caregivers' current coping capabilities. Clinicians shared that junior clinicians could benefit from CHAT-MI to better detect caregiving stress and deliver interventions. Nevertheless, more can be done to train clinicians in the understanding of the concept of mastery (i.e., perceived control over life events) to help clinicians better engage and support caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHAT-MI was found to be relatively brief and can aid the outpatient clinic setting. This suggests that such an evidence-based assessment cum intervention can be considered for use in a real-world clinical setting to aid both caregivers and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"10 ","pages":"23779608241307002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241307002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family members caring for a person living with dementia (PWD) can experience caregiver burden, leading to psychological distress if unmanaged. It's essential for healthcare professionals, especially nurses to identify caregivers at risk of stress and depression, triggering prompt management during their contact with caregivers of PWD. The study team developed an evidence-based caregiver burden-mastery hybrid assessment and intervention decision matrix (CHAT-MI) for caregivers of PWD and examined its feasibility of use.

Objective: To determine the feasibility and usability of implementing the CHAT-MI assessment-decision matrix tool in an outpatient setting in Singapore.

Methods: CHAT-MI was developed through earlier research, research evidence, clinical guidelines, and expert opinion. A multimethod study was conducted in a Singapore outpatient memory clinic from November 2020 to January 2021. Caregivers of PWD who attended the clinic self-administered the assessment tool to determine their burden and personal mastery levels. Clinicians used a decision matrix to guide interventions based on the assessments. Feedback was gathered from both caregivers and clinicians through surveys and semistructured interviews.

Results: Thirty-four caregivers and six clinicians participated in the study. Caregivers found the burden-mastery assessment tool relatively easy to use and understand and helpful. Clinicians found the assessment-decision matrix tool acceptable, feasible, and useful, enhancing standard care by providing insights into caregivers' current coping capabilities. Clinicians shared that junior clinicians could benefit from CHAT-MI to better detect caregiving stress and deliver interventions. Nevertheless, more can be done to train clinicians in the understanding of the concept of mastery (i.e., perceived control over life events) to help clinicians better engage and support caregivers.

Conclusion: CHAT-MI was found to be relatively brief and can aid the outpatient clinic setting. This suggests that such an evidence-based assessment cum intervention can be considered for use in a real-world clinical setting to aid both caregivers and clinicians.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信