Restorative Justice Practices as a Foundation for Medical Education Innovation

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1111/tct.13852
Christopher L. Klasson, Amal Shibli-Rahhal, Eric Ortiz, Ashrita Raghuram, Jay Behel, Ada Gregory, Carrie Bernat, Nicole del Castillo
{"title":"Restorative Justice Practices as a Foundation for Medical Education Innovation","authors":"Christopher L. Klasson,&nbsp;Amal Shibli-Rahhal,&nbsp;Eric Ortiz,&nbsp;Ashrita Raghuram,&nbsp;Jay Behel,&nbsp;Ada Gregory,&nbsp;Carrie Bernat,&nbsp;Nicole del Castillo","doi":"10.1111/tct.13852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Restorative justice (RJ) is an ethical lens that places emphasis on a community's connection and proliferative impact of actions, promoting communication and establishing methods for accountability. RJ practices can be applied on a spectrum, including proactive community-building practices, community discussions in response to an event, and restorative conferences addressing specific incidences of harm. This article describes an intervention that utilized RJ community-building practices within a medical education environment and evaluates its acceptability and feasibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>During the summer of 2023, RJ interventions were planned, executed and assessed within two programmes involving pre–matriculant medical students, physician–assistant studies students and undergraduate students. The interventions utilized community-building circles within small group activities. Capacity building included training for facilitators. Ninety-five students participated in the RJ circles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Evaluation included mixed methods pre- and post-intervention surveys as well as qualitative interviews. Ten students (11%) responded to the pre-intervention survey, and 17 responded to the post-intervention survey (18%). Seven responses were obtained from interviews and qualitative surveys. Overall, participant survey responses indicated increased feelings of connection and perceptions of mutual understanding and that the programme provided adequate space to share one's perspective. Qualitative content analysis emphasized community building through RJ circles and their ability to promote connection, meaningful vulnerability, foster peer support and a desire to continue these activities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>RJ interventions within medical education environments are feasible and show considerable promise. Participants consistently noted the benefits of greater connection between peers, feelings of support and a desire for these practices to continue.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.13852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Restorative justice (RJ) is an ethical lens that places emphasis on a community's connection and proliferative impact of actions, promoting communication and establishing methods for accountability. RJ practices can be applied on a spectrum, including proactive community-building practices, community discussions in response to an event, and restorative conferences addressing specific incidences of harm. This article describes an intervention that utilized RJ community-building practices within a medical education environment and evaluates its acceptability and feasibility.

Approach

During the summer of 2023, RJ interventions were planned, executed and assessed within two programmes involving pre–matriculant medical students, physician–assistant studies students and undergraduate students. The interventions utilized community-building circles within small group activities. Capacity building included training for facilitators. Ninety-five students participated in the RJ circles.

Evaluation

Evaluation included mixed methods pre- and post-intervention surveys as well as qualitative interviews. Ten students (11%) responded to the pre-intervention survey, and 17 responded to the post-intervention survey (18%). Seven responses were obtained from interviews and qualitative surveys. Overall, participant survey responses indicated increased feelings of connection and perceptions of mutual understanding and that the programme provided adequate space to share one's perspective. Qualitative content analysis emphasized community building through RJ circles and their ability to promote connection, meaningful vulnerability, foster peer support and a desire to continue these activities.

Implications

RJ interventions within medical education environments are feasible and show considerable promise. Participants consistently noted the benefits of greater connection between peers, feelings of support and a desire for these practices to continue.

恢复性司法实践是医学教育创新的基础。
背景:恢复性司法(RJ)是一种伦理视角,强调社区的联系和行动的扩散影响,促进沟通和建立问责制方法。RJ实践可以广泛应用,包括积极的社区建设实践,针对事件的社区讨论,以及针对特定伤害事件的恢复性会议。本文描述了在医学教育环境中利用RJ社区建设实践的干预措施,并评估了其可接受性和可行性。方法:在2023年夏季,RJ干预措施在两个方案中进行了规划、执行和评估,涉及医学院预科学生、医师助理研究学生和本科生。这些干预措施利用小组活动中的社区建设圈。能力建设包括对辅导员的培训。95名学生参加了RJ圈子。评估:评估包括干预前和干预后调查以及定性访谈的混合方法。10名学生(11%)回应了干预前调查,17名学生回应了干预后调查(18%)。从访谈和定性调查中获得了七个回答。总的来说,参与者的调查答复表明,联系感和相互理解的感觉增加了,该方案提供了充分的空间来分享自己的观点。定性内容分析强调通过RJ圈子建立社区及其促进联系、有意义的脆弱性、促进同伴支持和继续这些活动的愿望的能力。启示:医学教育环境中的RJ干预是可行的,并显示出相当大的前景。参与者一致指出,加强同伴之间的联系、获得支持的感觉以及希望这些做法继续下去的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信