Community social capital and all-cause mortality in Japan: Findings from the Adachi Cohort Study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hiroshi Murayama, Mika Sugiyama, Hiroki Inagaki, Ayako Edahiro, Fumiko Miyamae, Chiaki Ura, Keiko Motokawa, Tsuyoshi Okamura, Shuichi Awata
{"title":"Community social capital and all-cause mortality in Japan: Findings from the Adachi Cohort Study.","authors":"Hiroshi Murayama, Mika Sugiyama, Hiroki Inagaki, Ayako Edahiro, Fumiko Miyamae, Chiaki Ura, Keiko Motokawa, Tsuyoshi Okamura, Shuichi Awata","doi":"10.2188/jea.JE20240277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community social capital is associated with various health outcomes; however, its impact on mortality is not fully understood, particularly in non-Western settings. This study examined the association between community-level social capital and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older Japanese adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The baseline data were obtained from a 2015 questionnaire survey for all 132,005 residents aged ≥65 years without long-term care insurance certification in Adachi Ward (consisting of 262 small districts) of the Tokyo metropolitan area. We measured two aspects of social capital: neighborhood cohesion as cognitive social capital and neighborhood network as structural social capital. For district-level social capital, we aggregated the individual responses of neighborhood cohesion and neighborhood network in each district.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 75,338 were analyzed. A multilevel survival analysis with an average follow-up of 1,656 days showed that higher district-level neighborhood cohesion was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in men (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.92 [0.84-0.99] for the highest quintile and 0.91 [0.82-0.99] for the second, compared to the lowest), not in women. This association was more pronounced in men aged 65-74 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights from the Asian population. Men, who typically have fewer social networks and support systems than women, could receive more benefits from residing in a cohesive community, which may contribute to their longevity. These findings support public health strategies that bolster community social capital as a means of archiving longevity among older men, underscoring the importance of social integration in aging societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20240277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community social capital is associated with various health outcomes; however, its impact on mortality is not fully understood, particularly in non-Western settings. This study examined the association between community-level social capital and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older Japanese adults.

Methods: The baseline data were obtained from a 2015 questionnaire survey for all 132,005 residents aged ≥65 years without long-term care insurance certification in Adachi Ward (consisting of 262 small districts) of the Tokyo metropolitan area. We measured two aspects of social capital: neighborhood cohesion as cognitive social capital and neighborhood network as structural social capital. For district-level social capital, we aggregated the individual responses of neighborhood cohesion and neighborhood network in each district.

Results: A total of 75,338 were analyzed. A multilevel survival analysis with an average follow-up of 1,656 days showed that higher district-level neighborhood cohesion was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in men (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.92 [0.84-0.99] for the highest quintile and 0.91 [0.82-0.99] for the second, compared to the lowest), not in women. This association was more pronounced in men aged 65-74 years.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights from the Asian population. Men, who typically have fewer social networks and support systems than women, could receive more benefits from residing in a cohesive community, which may contribute to their longevity. These findings support public health strategies that bolster community social capital as a means of archiving longevity among older men, underscoring the importance of social integration in aging societies.

日本社区社会资本和全因死亡率:来自Adachi队列研究的结果。
背景:社区社会资本与各种健康结果相关;然而,其对死亡率的影响尚未完全了解,特别是在非西方国家。本研究探讨社区社会资本与日本社区老年人全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:基线数据来自2015年对东京大都市区足立区(由262个小区组成)132005名65岁以上无长期护理保险证明的居民进行问卷调查。社区凝聚力作为认知社会资本,社区网络作为结构社会资本。对于区级社会资本,我们汇总了各区社区凝聚力和社区网络的个体反应。结果:共分析75,338例。一项平均随访1656天的多水平生存分析显示,较高的区级邻里凝聚力与男性全因死亡风险较低相关(与最低五分位数相比,最高五分位数的风险比为0.92[0.84-0.99],第二五分位数的风险比为0.91[0.82-0.99]),但与女性无关。这种关联在65-74岁的男性中更为明显。结论:本研究为亚洲人群提供了有价值的见解。男性通常比女性拥有更少的社交网络和支持系统,他们可以从生活在一个有凝聚力的社区中获得更多的好处,这可能有助于他们长寿。这些发现支持公共卫生战略,将社区社会资本作为存档老年男性寿命的手段,强调了老龄化社会中社会融合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology
Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信