Hyo Jin Jean Jeon, Michelle Granner, Elizabeth Christiansen, Taya Kohnen, Sung-Yeon Park, Bret Sarnquist, Patricia MacNeil, Valery Soto, Olivia Deavers
{"title":"Association Between Breastfeeding Peer Support and Confidence in Breastfeeding.","authors":"Hyo Jin Jean Jeon, Michelle Granner, Elizabeth Christiansen, Taya Kohnen, Sung-Yeon Park, Bret Sarnquist, Patricia MacNeil, Valery Soto, Olivia Deavers","doi":"10.1177/08903344241299398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program.</p><p><strong>Research aims: </strong>(1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: <i>t</i> (189) = -6.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and after the baby was born: <i>t</i> (170) = -2.59, <i>p</i> = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: <i>F</i> (7,352) = 12.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: <i>F</i> (7,352) = 7.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":" ","pages":"132-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241299398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Peer support programs may be effective for supporting breastfeeding among diverse groups, and in reducing disparities. This study provides insight regarding the implementation and outcomes of a peer breastfeeding support program.
Research aims: (1) to examine how participation affected the outcomes of breastfeeding motivation, confidence, and coping strategies; and (2) to evaluate satisfaction with the program.
Method: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Seven pilot sites in the United States uniquely implemented a federally-funded peer support program for low-income women. Data were collected using a survey and focus groups/interviews. Over 12 months, 1,296 women participated, comprising 615 peer support pairs. A total of 401 women responded to the survey. Twenty-three focus groups and 63 interviews were conducted across the seven sites.
Results: Participants who enrolled in the program during pregnancy: t (189) = -6.55, p < 0.001, and after the baby was born: t (170) = -2.59, p = 0.001, gained confidence in breastfeeding. More satisfied participants were more likely to breastfeed longer: F (7,352) = 12.75, p < 0.001, and cope with breastfeeding challenges: F (7,352) = 7.83, p < 0.001.
Conclusion: Effective operation strategies of the peer breastfeeding support program have significantly influenced participant satisfaction. Introducing peer support for low-income women to share their breastfeeding experiences would be beneficial in enhancing breastfeeding rates. However, the generalizability of these findings may be limited to this U.S. federally-funded peer support program.
背景:同伴支持计划可能对支持不同群体的母乳喂养有效,并减少差异。本研究对同伴母乳喂养支持计划的实施和结果提供了见解。研究目的:(1)研究参与对母乳喂养动机、信心和应对策略的影响;(2)评价项目满意度。方法:采用横断面、回顾性研究。美国有7个试点地区为低收入妇女独特地实施了一项由联邦政府资助的同伴支持计划。通过调查和焦点小组/访谈收集数据。在12个月的时间里,有1,296名妇女参与,包括615对同伴支持对。共有401名女性参与了这项调查。在七个地点进行了23个焦点小组和63个访谈。结果:在怀孕期间参加该计划的参与者:t (189) = -6.55, p t (170) = -2.59, p = 0.001,获得了母乳喂养的信心。越满意的参与者越可能延长母乳喂养时间:F (7,352) = 12.75, p F (7,352) = 7.83, p结论:有效的同伴母乳喂养支持项目操作策略对参与者满意度有显著影响。为低收入妇女提供同伴支持,让她们分享母乳喂养经验,将有助于提高母乳喂养率。然而,这些发现的普遍性可能仅限于美国联邦资助的同伴支持计划。
期刊介绍:
Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are:
To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities.
To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL.
In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features:
Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy
About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue
Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe
Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue
Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications
International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.