Does Orthopaedic Resident Pelvis Fluoroscopy Knowledge improve with testing with a Novel Pelvis Model and Educational website?

IF 2 3区医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06393-0

Henry T Shu, Diane Ghanem, Justin E Hellwinkel, Nicholas J Tucker, Benjamin D Pesante, Marc Greenberg, Chima D Nwankwo, Babar Shafiq, Cyril Mauffrey

{"title":"Does Orthopaedic Resident Pelvis Fluoroscopy Knowledge improve with testing with a Novel Pelvis Model and Educational website?","authors":"Henry T Shu, Diane Ghanem, Justin E Hellwinkel, Nicholas J Tucker, Benjamin D Pesante, Marc Greenberg, Chima D Nwankwo, Babar Shafiq, Cyril Mauffrey","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06393-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We tested whether residents would improve in fluoroscopy knowledge and ability after using an inexpensive novel pelvis model and educational website.Methods: Twenty-four orthopaedic residents were recruited from three United States residency programs and randomised into two groups with equal numbers of juniors and seniors. The OrthoAcademy group received educational materials from a website ( www.theorthoacademy.com ), whereas the control group did not. Survey scores, radiograph scores, number of fluoroscopic images taken, and overall radiation exposure were compared (1) between control and OrthoAcademy groups and (2) between junior and senior residents.Results: Both groups had higher radiograph scores at the second round of testing than at the first (P =.004). The OrthoAcademy group had higher post-test than pre-test knowledge survey scores (P =.045), whereas the control group did not (P =.54). However, the OrthoAcademy group did not have higher radiograph scores between tests (P =.15), whereas the control group did (P =.01). Junior residents had higher second-round than first-round radiograph scores (P =.005) and survey scores (P =.006), whereas senior residents did not (P =.24 radiograph scores) (P =.30 survey scores).Conclusions: Testing residents with this novel pelvis model improved the quality of the fluoroscopic images obtained by the residents, especially juniors. This study highlighted the need for more accessible resources for residents to learn about obtaining these images.","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06393-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We tested whether residents would improve in fluoroscopy knowledge and ability after using an inexpensive novel pelvis model and educational website.

Methods: Twenty-four orthopaedic residents were recruited from three United States residency programs and randomised into two groups with equal numbers of juniors and seniors. The OrthoAcademy group received educational materials from a website ( www.theorthoacademy.com ), whereas the control group did not. Survey scores, radiograph scores, number of fluoroscopic images taken, and overall radiation exposure were compared (1) between control and OrthoAcademy groups and (2) between junior and senior residents.

Results: Both groups had higher radiograph scores at the second round of testing than at the first (P =.004). The OrthoAcademy group had higher post-test than pre-test knowledge survey scores (P =.045), whereas the control group did not (P =.54). However, the OrthoAcademy group did not have higher radiograph scores between tests (P =.15), whereas the control group did (P =.01). Junior residents had higher second-round than first-round radiograph scores (P =.005) and survey scores (P =.006), whereas senior residents did not (P =.24 radiograph scores) (P =.30 survey scores).

Conclusions: Testing residents with this novel pelvis model improved the quality of the fluoroscopic images obtained by the residents, especially juniors. This study highlighted the need for more accessible resources for residents to learn about obtaining these images.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

7.40%

发文量

360

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.